You should read "The Mystery of Banking" by Murray N. Rothbard because you misunderstand the origin of money. It starts with the basic necessities.
i read it long ago, rothbard's political views skew his objectivity
You should read it again for comprehension this time.
what do you think i didn't comprehend?
The origin of money is from nature. Food is money. It just doesn't preserve as well as gold.
food is food, it takes abstract thinking to conceive it as money
This is why I refer "The Mystery of Banking" to you. You could learn some truths.
If I have two fish, and you have four eggs, then we can use a fish and two eggs as a valuable medium of exchange for a nice balanced meal. What it takes to understand that food is money is not abstract thinking but honesty and understanding.
i think you understand that sort of barter is inefficient and generally archaic, over time the understanding of money theories have advanced to more productive and useful forms
Yes. And this is most likely why gold, silver, and other commodities keep rising in value against the Fed's dollar.
generally, what goes up, comes down
Could you offer some evidence on why you think the value of gold will drop in terms of FRNs
do you think it'll go up forever?
generally, what goes up, comes down
I don't think anyone here is arguing that it'll trend upward, quickly, forever, but that it'll trend upward forever, as long as the Fed maintains a policy of inflation.
LOL, do you think the value of the current U.S. dollar will stay as high as it is forever?
do you think it'll go up forever?
Actually I was just hoping for evidence that what you're saying is true.
But to answer your question, I think that eventually the gold price in FRNs will be stable. And by that I mean that no amount of FRNs will purchase any amount of gold. The caveat is that the current trend ends in its logical conclusion.
what you wrote reminds me of this rhetoric from 1988
at 2:45 ron paul said, "I anticipate, and many Austrian free market economists anticipate, that the recession that's coming will not be a recession at all but it will a depression and it will probably be bigger than the one we had in the 1930s"