webaform
Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Messages
- 108
LOL.......I had to bookmark that.
http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/magical+trevor/
What did he see?
LOL.......I had to bookmark that.
Lots of Beans Lots of Beans!
i like turtles ~ www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y
I see it as more a policy of containment. I think they built up Huckabee to take away from RP, and now they build up RP to take away from Huckabee. The "master plan" would be to keep the field as level as possible, ensuring that no-one takes the lead. Why? 'Cause Hillary has the blessing of the establishment.
So they won't lose credibility if Dr. Paul wins. Notice the focus of today's media attention was "What if the polls are wrong about Dr. Paul"
I don't think they have a master plan toward Ron Paul. I'm sure they'd like to be done with him if possible, but a master plan"Their" master plan to counter Ron Paul's growth was to do this:
No arguments thereGive him minimal/skewed coverage for as long as possible
Yeah, I don't think that has anything to do with Ron Paul. Huckabee has good media people. The reason he's gotten such great media coverage so far is probably quid pro quo. Also, I don't think it's artificial. It definitely exists. I don't think it's going to exist for very long, but it exists for the time being anyway.Artificially raise Huckabee to distract people away from Dr. Paul
No, actually a lot of people haven't. You don't think Ron Paul getting good media coverage is partly the campaign's own doing? There are a lot of caucus go-ers who are paying closer attention to the media, as well other people in early primary states like NH, Michigan, SC, Nevada. It's like you guys live in a bubble or something... It can and will make a difference. If the media really didn't want RP to get anywhere, they'd simply ignore him. That'd be their best bet. It's been working so far. Now, some of you will say they're giving him good coverage to save face. That could be part of it certainly, if the campaign has given the networks some info most of us aren't aware of. It just seems so unlikely to me though.Give good coverage the day before the Iowa caucus (because most people have made up their minds and there is no time left to research Dr. Paul)
You took my meaning of "master plan" much to broadly.
I think if there is a sudden surge in coverage perhaps they know he's about to surprise? Third maybe? Second?