My theory on Rand's low polling

I disagree. Rand came off as angry last debate and it was a turn off for many because it was poorly executed. He needs to be intelligent and focused as well as intense, but I would not advise "anger" as a debate strategy.
I agree Rand doesn't handle his anger well. Megan Kelly is right on this but Rand is who rand is and we can't change that. Ron killed his chances by getting angry about being asked about the newsletters after his Iowa surge and it cost him the election.
 
Rand is polling low for the same reason his father polled low.

The AmeriKan people have lost their taste for freedom.

The want big powerful government, to boss other people around and give them handouts.

They do NOT want liberty, small government and individual responsibility.
 
Ron Paul is your idea of a good politician? And you're sure that no one cares about conservative talking points? How can you be so sure that people even hear GOO talking points? If they don't like them when they actually hear them, then how was Ron Paul as good at winning hearts and minds as you claim he is? And why wasn't he president the last five years if he was that good?

Remember what happened to him.


There is no doubt in my mind that Ron Paul would have been elected President had the media treated him fairly.
 
Last edited:
weak immigration stance, and rise of ISIS. but things could still turn around, if/when Carly and Carson implode
 
Back
Top