BuddyRey
Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2007
- Messages
- 11,172
My yardstick for determining who (or what) has rights is assessing that person or animal's capacity for recognizing the rights of others. This isn't an exact science of course, because some dogs seem to exhibit this capacity almost as well as most humans, and others have little if any conception of rights beyond who can jostle or bite his way to the food bowl first.
One thing many libertarians say that I will take issue with is that "dogs are property." Your dog is no more your "property" than your child is. You fulfill a guardianship role over pets and children, but at the end of the day, that dog (like that child) is still a sentient being deserving of some measure of respect.
One thing many libertarians say that I will take issue with is that "dogs are property." Your dog is no more your "property" than your child is. You fulfill a guardianship role over pets and children, but at the end of the day, that dog (like that child) is still a sentient being deserving of some measure of respect.