gerryb
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 2,942
Wow can't believe I'd say thank you ACLU. What a pathetic ordinance. Keep fighting the good fight.
Get used to it. =)
They are good allies in this fight.
Wow can't believe I'd say thank you ACLU. What a pathetic ordinance. Keep fighting the good fight.
Just sent an email to freedomwatch <at> foxbusiness.com
Would be cool if they picked the story up..
Uppity City Council members with nothing better to do than pick on people, what a joke. Sadly it seems that most town council members are following this trend all over the country. Busybodies with no real reason for their sad existence in politics.
<snip>The Court placed a high value on residential signs for First Amendment purposes. Consistent with that opinion, the courts have regularly invalidated durational restrictions on political signs on private property. Curry v. Prince George's County, Maryland, 22, F.Supp.2d 447 (D.Md. 1999) (durational limit for political signs on private property invalid); Dimas v. City of Warren, 939 F.Supp. 554 (E.D. Mich. 1996) (durational limit for political signs on private property invalid);<snip>
"Matt was finally issued a Summons from the Borough of Woodland Park for the heinous crime of “display of election signs prior to election date”."
You should tell them that if you don't display the signs before the election date, they don't do much good
They tried to do this to me, but when I called the guy who issued the warning, it was obvious he had no idea what the law actually said (I guess he figured everyone would just knuckle under). He got flustered and I never heard back from him.
I've had my RP signs up continuously since 2007.