Considering Congressman Paul's admirable showing in the Iowa caucus--coming in ahead of Rudolph Giuliani--is it not fair to include him in the New Hampshire debate? While it's true that Giuliani was not focusing on Iowa, the fact that Paul outdid him, especially considering Giuliani's nationwide name recognition, is quite a feat.
Please include Dr. Ron Paul in the upcoming New Hampshire debate. He is not a "spoiler" candidate and the fact that he raised over $6,000,000 in one day shows that he has a real following; he just isn't known well enough because all of the media outlets seem to be largely ignoring him.
You claim that your network is "Fair and Balanced." Prove it by invite Ron Paul to the New Hampshire debate!
I encourage everyone else to email Fox News and/or a specific show on Fox News to, if nothing else, at least let them know that they are not fair nor balanced.
Please include Dr. Ron Paul in the upcoming New Hampshire debate. He is not a "spoiler" candidate and the fact that he raised over $6,000,000 in one day shows that he has a real following; he just isn't known well enough because all of the media outlets seem to be largely ignoring him.
You claim that your network is "Fair and Balanced." Prove it by invite Ron Paul to the New Hampshire debate!
I encourage everyone else to email Fox News and/or a specific show on Fox News to, if nothing else, at least let them know that they are not fair nor balanced.
