Musk promotes Ron's call to end the Fed

Ok but this is based.

Just because he says one "based" thing doesn't mean he is "based". Elon is as slimy and two-faced as they come and is simply stringing along libertarians by namedropping Ron Paul. Him, Vivek, and Vance are some of the most blatant grifters I've ever come across. Read into their backgrounds and their histories.
 
Just because he says one "based" thing doesn't mean he is "based". Elon is as slimy and two-faced as they come and is simply stringing along libertarians by namedropping Ron Paul. Him, Vivek, and Vance are some of the most blatant grifters I've ever come across. Read into their backgrounds and their histories.
You might want to do some research before you embarrass yourself again.
 
You might want to do some research before you embarrass yourself again.

Embarrass??? There is more than enough information and On the Record if one takes the time to research. Here is one, for example:

Vivek Ramaswamy On The Record

James Corbett, Whitney Webb and Catherine Austin Fitts have talked about Elon, Thiel, Swampy and Vance, many of which I have reposted on this forum.


Here is some in-depth for those who want to know more:

Selection 2024 with James Corbett and Whitney Webb

Discussion about the election, Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson, Peter Thiel, Javier Milei, WEF, U.N., Technocratic Society and Global/Regional Governance, sucking in libertarians, and more.​
 
Last edited:
Just because he says one "based" thing doesn't mean he is "based". Elon is as slimy and two-faced as they come and is simply stringing along libertarians by namedropping Ron Paul. Him, Vivek, and Vance are some of the most blatant grifters I've ever come across. Read into their backgrounds and their histories.
To what end? This makes no sense at all. They have nothing to gain by impressing libertarians.
 
To what end? This makes no sense at all. They have nothing to gain by impressing libertarians.


Matt, review the information in Post #6.


For example: The "left" use terms such as Climate Change and ESG, the "right" use terms such as Sustainable Investing, Climate Finance and Carbon Market/Sequestration.
 
You're so fucking gullible.

Where do you think his mars mission subsidy money is going to come from?
 
LMFAO.

Libertarians - Snatching Defeat From The Jaws of Victory Since 1971

Yeah, it's sickening.

In 2012, if we had Ron Paul's message being amplified like this, we would have been ecstatic. I have very low expectations that anything significant will actually get cut or any major changes taking place because of DOGE, but just the fact that this is in the conversation is a win. And these Debbie Downers don't get it.
 
Yeah, it's sickening.

In 2012, if we had Ron Paul's message being amplified like this, we would have been ecstatic. I have very low expectations that anything significant will actually get cut or any major changes taking place because of DOGE, but just the fact that this is in the conversation is a win. And these Debbie Downers don't get it.

Unless and until everybody is ready to "cry havoc" and raise the Black Flag, this is the only option we have, slowly eroding this edifice over years and years of nasty political work.

The fact that we've gone from the "Lunatic Fringe" to now holding many levers of the system's control and having the establishment on the ropes, in a matter of 16 years (Ron's first run) is, frankly, amazing.

Indeed, around the world, as most of the West falls into some nightmare dystopia of queeer communism, there are bright lights appearing as populist, libertarian, nationalist and anti-establishment freedom folks of all different stripes rise to prominence.

Keep pushing forward and let bitchers and hanky wringers be left behind.

I like to say this whole thing started 50 years ago in efforts to push back gun control. My God look at the progress made there...when I started in all this, a national ban on handguns was close to being enacted. Now take a look.

The future forward is not to back down but to triple down.

Firearms Policy Coalition > NRA

https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1868808270183362911

 
Last edited:
Yeah, it's sickening.

In 2012, if we had Ron Paul's message being amplified like this, we would have been ecstatic. I have very low expectations that anything significant will actually get cut or any major changes taking place because of DOGE, but just the fact that this is in the conversation is a win. And these Debbie Downers don't get it.
What is a Debbie Downer?
 
Yeah, it's sickening.

In 2012, if we had Ron Paul's message being amplified like this, we would have been ecstatic. I have very low expectations that anything significant will actually get cut or any major changes taking place because of DOGE, but just the fact that this is in the conversation is a win. And these Debbie Downers don't get it.

For the record, speaking for myself, I am ecstatic to see Ron Paul's message amplified this way. I hope it continues.

I also want to know what's in the fine print.
 
Embarrass??? There is more than enough information and On the Record if one takes the time to research. Here is one, for example:

Vivek Ramaswamy On The Record

James Corbett, Whitney Webb and Catherine Austin Fitts have talked about Elon, Thiel, Swampy and Vance, many of which I have reposted on this forum.


Here is some in-depth for those who want to know more:
Selection 2024 with James Corbett and Whitney Webb

Discussion about the election, Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson, Peter Thiel, Javier Milei, WEF, U.N., Technocratic Society and Global/Regional Governance, sucking in libertarians, and more.​
You sir, are no lover of liberty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Yeah, it's sickening.

In 2012, if we had Ron Paul's message being amplified like this, we would have been ecstatic. I have very low expectations that anything significant will actually get cut or any major changes taking place because of DOGE, but just the fact that this is in the conversation is a win. And these Debbie Downers don't get it.

If it was Dick Cheney doing the amplifying in 2012, you would have said "where's the catch" and not "ohhhh boy he's coming around!"
 
If it was Dick Cheney doing the amplifying in 2012, you would have said "where's the catch" and not "ohhhh boy he's coming around!"

Hey dipshit... You can change the situation anyway you want to make it better for your argument, but that didn't and wouldn't have happened. Is this some kind of Sam Harris, "If everything were different with the pandemic, I would have been right" type of thing??
 
Back
Top