Murdering navy SEAL thug Chris Kyle sniped in New Orleans

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
51,888
I just ran across this and I'm physically ill. I didn't know Chris Kyle admitted to going to New Orleans in the aftermath of Katrina, getting on top of the Superdome, and killing 30 people in cold blood. Oh sure he justifies this as saying they were "armed looters". But who made him judge, jury and executioner? Who made him God? Maybe God told the marine he was trying to help at the gun range to kill him (Kyle). It's sick that fake conservatives hold him up as a hero.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/06/03/in-the-crosshairs
The session went well. Kilbane told me that he was struck by Kyle’s “aura,” noting that whenever “he walked in the room the dynamic would change, the energy in the room would shift.” Afterward, a larger group went out for dinner, closed the hotel bar, and hung out in Kyle’s suite, drinking until late. The SEALs began telling stories, and Kyle offered a shocking one. In the days after Hurricane Katrina, he said, the law-and-order situation was dire. He and another sniper travelled to New Orleans, set up on top of the Superdome, and proceeded to shoot dozens of armed residents who were contributing to the chaos. Three people shared with me varied recollections of that evening: the first said that Kyle claimed to have shot thirty men on his own; according to the second, the story was that Kyle and the other sniper had shot thirty men between them; the third said that she couldn’t recall specific details.
 
Oh sure he justifies this as saying they were "armed looters". But who made him judge, jury and executioner?

How about the people who are looted? Who makes you judge, jury and executioner when somebody's armed robbing your house? How dare you defend your property with arms!
 
How about the people who are looted? Who makes you judge, jury and executioner when somebody's armed robbing your house? How dare you defend your property with arms!

:rolleyes: Chris Kyle wasn't "defending his property". The asshole wasn't even from New Orleans. How pray tell would he be able to tell from on top of the superdome which armed person was a looter and which one was a defender? By their uniforms? :rolleyes: Really the last place I would expect to see someone defending mass murder by a government thug is at RPF. That said, Kyle was probably lying. Sick bastard.
 
:rolleyes: Chris Kyle wasn't "defending his property". The asshole wasn't even from New Orleans. How pray tell would he be able to tell from on top of the superdome which armed person was a looter and which one was a defender? By their uniforms? :rolleyes: Really the last place I would expect to see someone defending mass murder by a government thug is at RPF. That said, Kyle was probably lying. Sick bastard.

you can't tell what looting and defending looks like?
 
you can't tell what looting and defending looks like?

You're trolling. First off Chris Kyle, if he wasn't lying, wasn't doing either. He was just murdering. If you can't tell the difference between someone defending and someone not from the freaking area making a judgement call on who to murder then don't ask me what I can or can't tell. Second I saw the news reports where white people breaking into stores were called "scavengers" and blacks were called "looters". No. I doubt someone sitting on top of the Superdome in a city that had been largely abandoned and where cops were caught on video looting would really be able to tell looters from defenders to the point where murdering the looters was justified.
 
WWCKS (Who would Chris Kyle Shoot?)

lootingfinding.jpg
 
Live by the sword...

I loved it when Ron enraged them all by quoting the Prince of Peace and coining what would have been the movie title if Eastwood was actually a libertarian. Instead we get "Government Assassin". What a joke.

Remember back in the day when the LP, Reason Magazine, and similar outfits used to advertise Clint Eastwood as one of us "Libertarians?"
 
You're trolling. First off Chris Kyle, if he wasn't lying, wasn't doing either. He was just murdering. If you can't tell the difference between someone defending and someone not from the freaking area making a judgement call on who to murder then don't ask me what I can or can't tell. Second I saw the news reports where white people breaking into stores were called "scavengers" and blacks were called "looters". No. I doubt someone sitting on top of the Superdome in a city that had been largely abandoned and where cops were caught on video looting would really be able to tell looters from defenders to the point where murdering the looters was justified.

Hell, the cops were having a regular human shooting gallery. And being covered for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danziger_Bridge_shootings
 
You're trolling. First off Chris Kyle, if he wasn't lying, wasn't doing either. He was just murdering. If you can't tell the difference between someone defending and someone not from the freaking area making a judgement call on who to murder then don't ask me what I can or can't tell. Second I saw the news reports where white people breaking into stores were called "scavengers" and blacks were called "looters". No. I doubt someone sitting on top of the Superdome in a city that had been largely abandoned and where cops were caught on video looting would really be able to tell looters from defenders to the point where murdering the looters was justified.

If you don't live in NOLA you can't know what looters look like?!
 
If you don't live in NOLA you can't know what looters look like?!

If you don't live in NOLA you can't claim to be defending your property. :rolleyes: And if your on top of the Superdome looking down at a confrontation between two armed men, how do you know who is the looter and who is the defender? By the color of their skin? And since when did you become a supporter of government thuggery?

Back to your original stupid quote.

How about the people who are looted? Who makes you judge, jury and executioner when somebody's armed robbing your house? How dare you defend your property with arms!

Your argument only applies to someone defending his property. It doesn't apply to someone shooting someone to defend someone else's property.

Here's a simple scenario. Person A uses a knife to car jack person B. Person B goes home and gets his gun. Person B now uses his gun to make person A get out of the car. All you see is person B forcing person A out of the car at gunpoint. Who do you shoot and why?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top