MSNBC vs Ron Paul - Very Tense Interview

LOL, I loved at the end where he said the "anytime somebody attacks me like you are doing, its because they disagree with my foreign policy". haha

Edit: also when she first described it as an "antisemetic" group, he quickly followed that up by describing it as a "pro-peace" group. loved how he quickly turned that around.

LOL! Yes that was great too! He is now allowed to let his hair down, so to speak, and he is not allowing these presstitutes to run roughshod over him any more!

Again, I am so glad he is out of the political arena where he has to watch EVER word he says! Politics suck!
 
LOVE IT! Now that he's out of Congress he probably feels more free to answer back to these idiots.

TRUTH = ANTI-SEMITISM
 
Remember: McCain/Obama Are ‘Mainstream,’ Normal People Are ‘Fringe’
http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/remember-mccainobama-are-mainstream-normal-people-are-fringe/

I saw a segment on MSNBC today in which the host could not believe Ron Paul was unimpressed with Obama’s extraordinary magnanimity in electing to consult Congress before bombing Syria. Obama’s move was “unprecedented,” the host inanely claimed. Not unprecedented at all. George H.W. Bush took exactly the same line in 1991: I’ll consult Congress to shut you peons up, but I don’t need to, and can still do whatever I want. John Kerry holds that precise view, and can’t give a simple answer to the question of what the President will do if Congress votes no.

Yet this deeply impresses an MSNBC host. What great progressives these are!

When Dr. Paul was on the screen, they had at the bottom the words “Father of the Fringe?” This is typical, of course. MSNBC might make occasional fun of, say, John McCain, but he is much too close to them politically for them to call his views “fringe,” even though he sings about bombing people and wouldn’t rule out staying in Iraq for 100 years. That’s mainstream and respectable, you understand. Fringe is when, instead of consistently supporting war, as McCain does, you consistently support peace, and refuse to believe White House propaganda that the rest of the world is laughing at. That’s fringe, man.

I can’t improve on Glenn Greenwald’s beautiful takedown of people who throw “fringe” and “crazy” at people who think maybe — maybe! — all possible views one might wish to hold are not contained within the spectrum that runs all five inches from Mitt Romney to Joe Biden:

In 2003, the crank lunatic-monster Ron Paul vehemently opposed the invasion of Iraq, while countless sane, normal, upstanding, good-hearted Democrats — including the current Vice President, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Senate Majority Leader, House Majority Leader, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, and many of the progressive pundits who love to scorn Ron Paul as insane — supported the monstrous attack on that country...

Go read it all and give the great Tom Woods some hits.

ETA: Here's the twit's twitter:

 
Last edited:
Couple of thoughts.

One, what a bitch.

Two, there is no anti-semitism without there first being semetism, ie, hyper-ethnocentric behavior, and aggression (ex. the bolshevik revolution).
 
I don't speak or really think in profanities often. But watching this made fall back in my chair and go "OH SH!T" on repeat for about 2 minutes.

Wow. Go Ron.
 
Watched the interview and it was typical. What really captured my attention was this woman's love for Obama. I then went to Alex Wagner's Wikipedia page and I was not surprised, her resume and beliefs were so cliche stuff like "From 2003 to 2007, she was editor-in-chief of The Fader magazine, covering music and cultural movements from around the world" and "She has described herself as progressive and believes that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution should be repealed."

Quotes taken from Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Wagner
 
Last edited:
So much good in this!!! So much!!!

In case anyone missed it... Both parties to this "interview" had an objective.

Hers: Discredit Ron Paul and libertarianism with her audience. (After all, they may have to fight one of these guys for the Presidency.)
His: Directly address the "progressive" drones that watch MSNBC and bring them into the libertarian coalition by capitalize on the growing distrust with that station's war-mongering at the behest of the PResident. (It's not left vs. right, it's us vs. them.)

Guess who won?!! lol!
 
I thought Ron handled that interview quite well, he's gotten better at taking on an adversarial host, or maybe it's like some of you said, now that he's out of office he feels free to speak his mind. Well done either way.
 
what a deceptive c*nt she was... I am glad RP fired back that they attack his characters because he isn't a war monger, that was great.. but she was much too snarky, but I guess being the lap dog for the special interests will do that to you....
 
Back
Top