smartguy911 Member Joined Dec 12, 2007 Messages 2,992 Jan 3, 2008 #2 wtf fred thompson at 3rd??? soo confused
Cleaner44 Member Joined Nov 12, 2007 Messages 9,348 Jan 3, 2008 #3 Mike Huckabee 487 33% 0 Mitt Romney 351 24% 0 Fred Thompson 260 18% 0 John McCain 171 12% 0 Ron Paul 154 11% 0 Rudy Giuliani 33 2% 0 Duncan Hunter 3 0% 0 2% of precincts reporting
Mike Huckabee 487 33% 0 Mitt Romney 351 24% 0 Fred Thompson 260 18% 0 John McCain 171 12% 0 Ron Paul 154 11% 0 Rudy Giuliani 33 2% 0 Duncan Hunter 3 0% 0 2% of precincts reporting
M Micahyah Member Joined Nov 5, 2007 Messages 639 Jan 3, 2008 #6 the rural really small ones are probably the first ones in, we'll probably do better in the later precints reporting in.
the rural really small ones are probably the first ones in, we'll probably do better in the later precints reporting in.
GHoeberX Member Joined Nov 5, 2007 Messages 1,129 Jan 3, 2008 #7 Noog said: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21229206 Click to expand... Most important is that we beat McCain... It's very important for the New Hampshire primary
Noog said: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21229206 Click to expand... Most important is that we beat McCain... It's very important for the New Hampshire primary
L liberty_Forever Member Joined Dec 27, 2007 Messages 1,300 Jan 3, 2008 #9 Fuck the MSM , listen to live primary source reporters
llamabread Member Joined May 13, 2007 Messages 296 Jan 3, 2008 #11 That completely contradicts what it says on the politico map
H homah Member Joined Dec 1, 2007 Messages 1,086 Jan 3, 2008 #12 2% reporting means absolutely nothing.
A ARealConservative Member Joined May 16, 2007 Messages 4,823 Jan 3, 2008 #13 party leaders had there votes in ahead of time and ready to be tallied. All the early numbers you saw were from the established leaders in the 99 counties. patience guys.
party leaders had there votes in ahead of time and ready to be tallied. All the early numbers you saw were from the established leaders in the 99 counties. patience guys.