Note:
The panel kept pushing the ideas of:
- Ron Paul should be seen as a 'Third party independent'
- Ron Paul is going to re-elect Obama
- "Oh his Ron Paul" - should be frown at and be ashamed of
- Mitt Romney has to put up with Ron Paul as just an inconvenient since his going to win regardless
- The young people are only going for Ron Paul; cause of his drugs policy and foreign policy....and not concern about economy, feds being dismantled, his failed fiscal policies, and that they should all be bring in to support the better candidates
- Ron Paul wants federal government to disappear
- Ron Paul is an isolationist or cut off from the rest of the world
- Ron Paul is an inconvenient for the GOP and sooner should they get rid of him the better , get Romney in
- Ron Paul supporters are just raging against the machine and not interested in solutions
- Ron Paul is incapable being so old
Why don't they put disclosures underneath: (like) what's being said are the opinions of broadcasters expressions and not a factual news... if they are going to use such disclosure for defence or else are guilty of disinformation and misleading the public therefore are subject to litigation...