Msg from Jonathan Bydlak -- willing to answer questions

[Aratus]

john taylor of the caroline was not into high tariffs...

 

[Aratus]

if at the federal level we negate the income tax, let us not think
high tariffs in a recession are a speedy means to aquire coins!
ron paul has yet to articulate out exactly how the rEVOLUTIOn shall
red pencil our upcoming budgets, if...!!! --- curiously i am reading up on
the political dialogues of the 1800s because they do have a pertinence!!!!

 

[ForLiberty-RonPaul]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=132780&page=5

What do you think???

June 6th, 2008 D-Day Money Bomb

 

[therealjjj77]

i had connected Monroe's anti-federalist identities and prose style to JUNIUS,
the Public Advisor letter writer who seemed to have appeared out of the blue,
and wrote between January of 1769 to January of 1772. The way he crafted
each foray into our early nation's press caused me to pause and focus on this
percursor to the heated debate that swirls around John Adams and the Alien
and Sedition Acts. John Jay's treaty is one of the later focal points. this has a
pertinence to the current hour. Our domestic and foreign policy in a unity... called
into question. the deeper "why" of gov't! any "blank checks" voided and cancelled.

The only purpose of government, the only gap it fills in any society that cannot be filled by any other entity(at this time), is to secure the inalienable rights of the governed.

That includes the right of a Citizen to contract an exchange of his labor for pay and earn the fruits thereof.

And when a government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and replace it. With every right comes a responsibility. So it is the duty of each of us to alter or abolish this government if it has become destructive of the ends of securing our inalienable rights.

Taxing the fruits of one's labor is "destructive of these ends". It is no less of a right than the right to life. If the government purported that it was going to protect the lives of it's citizens by taking their lives halfway through, then everyone would agree that this government has become "destructive of" the purpose it was established for. Likewise, if our government is claiming to protect our inalienable rights yet claiming it must infringe upon one of them to do so, it is not only dishonest but is also a rogue government.

Therefore, we have a duty to get involved in this political war for our country. It is not just a matter of preference but a matter of responsibility.

 

[V4Vendetta]

Well, it was his response to my polite reminder to try to avoid pointlessly insulting other members, telling my to go kill myself, that indicated I should probably check back in on this thread.

Are you deceased yet? DAMN

 

[V4Vendetta]

I guess thats a yes!!!!!!!!! YAY.................... THE WITCH IS DEAD!!!!!!!!!!! THE WITCH IS DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[flames2dust77]

Dr. King dreamt that his children would be judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Perhaps that should be ammended to "by the color of their fabulous loafers."

LOL! I was having a crappy morning, but this made me laugh hysterically. Love it.


And wow...how did this thread turn into gay and metrosexual talk? Totally irrelevant. Homophobes....shaaaddduuup.

 

[scotto2008]

I don't have anything to add, I just want to get rid of "666" in the number of replies. Superstitious I guess.

 

[ronpaulhawaii]

I don't have anything to add, I just want to get rid of "666" in the number of replies. Superstitious I guess.

LOL - yes, but now you have recorded it for posterity...

 

[constituent]

LOL - yes, but now you have recorded it for posterity...

seems like an opportune time to say,


ALL HAIL SATIN (and misspell it for kicks, hahahah)

 

[Tarzan]

I guess thats a yes!!!!!!!!! YAY.................... THE WITCH IS DEAD!!!!!!!!!!! THE WITCH IS DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Looks like he is not the only one who bailed... Bydlak seems to be gone as well. Too many tough questions I guess. Its a shame he still seems to think he was right about everything... too bad he did not have a mentor to actually teach him how the process works and how to win.

Learning how to justify losing and poor performance is not a good lesson for him to take into his future.

oh well

 

[mdh]

Oh Bradley, I'm not going to get into a pissing match with you, but the idea that you wanted $10,000 for a GOTV drive, rather than to line your own pockets is laughable. You can peddle this story, but I've seen your e-mail correspondence. Sure, this will just be a game of your word against mine, but don't think that your motivations aren't known by others who have seen them first hand.

I doubt Bradley wanted to line his own pockets. If he wanted to receive some payment that would go to him personally, it was likely fair by the going rate. The campaign had and still has millions of dollars. $10k less wouldn't be that big a deal considering the huge sum they are sitting on today and not using in states that have still not voted, and I'm sure it would've done a lot of good.

The fact is that the "rushed" nature of the campaign and their unwillingness to help states which were fast coming when they were focused nationally on others was something I witnessed myself. It hurt us in a lot of states, and no one who was on the ground doing the grunt work the way I was would disagree with that fact.

It's too bad that so many people on here trust what you have to say.

Hmmm. Bradley has been a valuable advisor and friend to me, even at his own expense at times. So I'd say it's actually quite fortunate that the majority of intelligent people recognize that in him.

And I think that it's funny that your vanity leads you think there's some sort of official "campaign of lies against you." Trust me Bradley, you aren't that important -- no one really cared. Our main goal was to protect Dr. Paul and our donors from people who desired to harm or take advantage of him, either intentionally or unwittingly. Perhaps someday people will come to realize that you damaged Ron Paul more than you helped him. And no number of forums posts will ever change that.

This seems like a pretty heavy charge to level against someone, so I'd challenge you to post proof rather than just slinging mud. Seriously, I'm not sure why you have something against Bradley, but it comes across pretty clearly here, and that's unfortunate.


The simple fact here is that I only decided to respond here because you impugned someone I think is a very good person and whom has always been genuinely motivated to do all that he could for this campaign. I've generally been pretty quiet in my criticisms of the national campaign staff, because I don't see any real benefit to being vocal about it, but the fact is that while most of the criticism I'd have towards the campaign is based on my own experiences dealing with it, plenty is also based on what former staffers have said in confidence about what went on.

The fact that the national campaign did a poor job is no secret, either - just look at how many states Dr. Paul came in first.

 

[Ninja Homer]

bump from the past