mRNA ‘Vaccines’ to Be Banned in America

[Invisible Man]

I'm quite sure he would, as a doctor he would take "First do no harm" seriously.

So you are sure that as a doctor he would voluntarily refrain from prescribing mRNA vaccines. Maybe that's true. I don't know. But if it is, that's not what the word "ban" means. And we both know that as a legislator or public policy advocate, he would absolutely and unequivocally oppose banning them. This is not debatable. And if you doubt it, then you know nothing at all about Ron Paul.

 

[Swordsmyth]

So you are sure that as a doctor he would voluntarily refrain from prescribing mRNA vaccines. Maybe that's true. I don't know. But if it is, that's not what the word "ban" means. And we both know that as a legislator or public policy advocate, he would absolutely and unequivocally oppose banning them. This is not debatable. And if you doubt it, then you know nothing at all about Ron Paul.

You know nothing about mRNA "vaccines", they are completely useless and only damaging, they are also a danger to people who don't even take them because of the shedding.

 

[acptulsa]

You know nothing about mRNA "vaccines"

You know even less.

He's needling you into an argument by talking not about this poison that your earthly god financed, but by including gene therapies that haven't even been invented yet. And you're doing it because you're toxic and come here for your two minutes hate, because you're so self-absorbed you can never have sympathy for someone with a genetic disorder unless you turn out to have it too, and because you're incapable of anything deeper than binary thinking.

So, you screech that the Maxwell is unreliable and has lousy brakes so all cars should be banned forever more. The tech will never improve. There oughta be a law.

 

[Invisible Man]

You know nothing about mRNA "vaccines", they are completely useless and only damaging, they are also a danger to people who don't even take them because of the shedding.

That's irrelevant.

 

[acptulsa]

That's irrelevant.

Clearly. But you're irreverent, and the ass kisser considers that a far greater crime.

 

[Invisible Man]

Clearly. But you're irreverent, and the ass kisser considers that a far greater crime.

What makes it worse is, Trump is completely unrepentant about Operation Warp Speed. He continues to brag that he personally deserves credit for developing the same mRNA vaccines that Swordy wants to ban, and that he saved millions of lives by doing so. He will never under any circumstances admit he was ever wrong about that. And he will never under any circumstances support banning them.

And yet, while my laissez faire approach of merely not wanting to ban them and leaving individuals to be responsible for their own decisions whether to use them or not (following Ron Paul's consistent approach to such questions) shows me to be some kind of a traitor in Swordy's eyes, Trump's thoroughgoing promotion of them doesn't reflect negatively on him at all.

 

[acptulsa]

And yet, while my laissez faire approach of merely not wanting to ban them and leaving individuals to be responsible for their own decisions whether to use them or not (following Ron Paul's consistent approach to such questions) shows me to be some kind of a traitor in Swordy's eyes, Trump's thoroughgoing promotion of them doesn't reflect negatively on him at all.

See, there you go being relevant but irreverent again.

Ooooo, he mad now!

 

[Madison320]

"Ban." More statist government involvement.

Government Has No Business In Healthcare, or any other private endeavors.

The private sector should embark upon whatever potential advancements that it wants, provided that it is not shielded from prosecution/liability [PREP Act] and not receive subsidies/bailouts from the tax payers.



It's just another Bait and Switch instead of eliminating federal agencies.

100% agree.

This is so annoying to me. It seems like almost everyone thinks there's only 2 options. Either the state should force it or ban it. We could have a 3rd option. It's this weird thing called freedom where you let people decide for themselves.

 

[Swordsmyth]

100% agree.

This is so annoying to me. It seems like almost everyone thinks there's only 2 options. Either the state should force it or ban it. We could have a 3rd option. It's this weird thing called freedom where you let people decide for themselves.

mRNA "vaccines" are weapons of mass destruction, they are quite literally bioweapons and should not be allowed any more than allowing everyone to have a nuke, or weaponized smallpox, or any other WMD.

 

[Invisible Man]

mRNA "vaccines" are weapons of mass destruction, they are quite literally bioweapons and should not be allowed any more than allowing everyone to have a nuke, or weaponized smallpox, or any other WMD.

So you support banning the federal government from owning any nukes?

 

[Swordsmyth]

So you support banning the federal government from owning any nukes?

A completely different question.
As long as our enemies have them we need to have them.

 

[Anti-Neocon]

Why do people even argue with the village idiot? Not only that, a statist.

 

[acptulsa]

A completely different question.

No. The only difference at all is mRNA could theoretically be used for something constructive.

Why do people even argue with the village idiot?

<JFK voice>People do this thing, not because it is hard, but because it is easy. </voice>

 

[Invisible Man]

A completely different question.
As long as our enemies have them we need to have them.

You say "we," but my question didn't ask about "we." It asked about the federal government.

And if our enemies (both those within the federal government and those within other foreign governments) have nukes, then "we" (=the people referred to in the Second Amendment) need to be allowed to have them too.

 

[acptulsa]

weapons of mass destruction

 

[Swordsmyth]

No. The only difference at all is mRNA could theoretically be used for something constructive.

No, it could not.

And if it by some miracle ever was it would need to absolutely prove itself before being allowed.

 

[Invisible Man]

No, it could not.

And if it by some miracle ever was it would need to absolutely prove itself before being allowed.

You're in the wrong place.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You're in the wrong place.

No, you and your Big Pharma loving friends are.

 

[acptulsa]

No, it could not.

And if it by some miracle ever was...

Every morning it's the same stupidity.

"Impossible! But if it's not..."

No, you and your Big Pharma loving friends are.

He's cliquing this morning, folks.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Every morning it's the same stupidity.

"Impossible! But if it's not..."

Imagine, he think's it's stupid to deal with the possibility of being wrong about an absolute statement dealing with a complex subject.

Just shows the simplicity of his mind.