More red flags

[A Ron Paul Rebel]

This last week in N.H. I haven't been on the forums very much... As of yesterday evening, I've been catching up on all the 'vote fraud chat'.

Here's what I see:

a) I say two Guiliani jumps of 200 votes when Dr. Paul was steadily gaining on him and finally cut Ghouls lead to around 64. (The next tally had the Ghoul up by 250+ with hardly any jump by Paul... this being after beating Ghoul in most updates.

b) Sutton is a forerunner of what most likely happened in multiple areas.

c) '9.11% for Ghouli is a huge red flag

d) Paul's 1st Place Finish surrounded by 4th and 5th place finishes is a red flag.

e) These '217' results are a red flag (I saw this posted else where)... This also contains the Ghoul's '9.11%' and also has .99% for 'Other votes'.

Hampton - 3,141 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 286 votes = 9.11%
- Huckabee = 217 votes = 6.91%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.22%
- McCain = 1217 votes = 38.75%
- Paul = 144 votes = 4.58%
- Romney = 1217 votes = 38.75%
- Thompson = 22 votes = 0.70%
- Other = 31 votes = 0.99%

f) Check out these other 'coincidences' from DieBold machines (I haven't seen any reference to this in the forums.)... it's as if the results were punched into a keypad!!!

Conway - 1,345 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 76 votes = 5.65%
- Huckabee = 189 votes = 14.05%
- Hunter = 4 votes = 0.30%
- McCain = 571 votes = 42.45%
- Paul = 123 votes = 9.14%
- Romney = 329 votes = 24.46%
- Thompson = 25 votes = 1.86%
- Other = 28 votes = 2.08%


Danville - 890 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 74 votes = 8.31%
- Huckabee = 75 votes = 8.43%
- Hunter = 5 votes = 0.56%
- McCain = 321 votes = 36.07%
- Paul = 50 votes = 5.62%
- Romney = 338 votes = 37.98%
- Thompson = 8 votes = 0.90%
- Other = 19 votes = 2.13%


Deerfield - 1,076 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 118 votes = 10.97%
- Huckabee = 145 votes = 13.48%
- Hunter = 5 votes = 0.46%
- McCain = 354 votes = 32.90%
- Paul = 88 votes = 8.18%
- Romney = 328 votes = 30.48%
- Thompson = 11 votes = 1.02%
- Other = 27 votes = 2.51%


Dover - 4,268 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 388 votes = 9.09%
- Huckabee = 458 votes = 10.73%
- Hunter = 16 votes = 0.37%
- McCain = 1779 votes = 41.68%
- Paul = 369 votes = 8.65%
- Romney = 1102 votes = 25.82%
- Thompson = 59 votes = 1.38%
- Other = 97 votes = 2.27%


Enfield - 643 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 41 votes = 6.38%
- Huckabee = 74 votes = 11.51%
- Hunter = 0 votes = 0.00%
- McCain = 309 votes = 48.06%
- Paul = 69 votes = 10.73%
- Romney = 119 votes = 18.51%
- Thompson = 18 votes = 2.80%
- Other = 13 votes = 2.02%


Gilford - 1,922 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 139 votes = 7.23%
- Huckabee = 139 votes = 7.23%
- Hunter = 8 votes = 0.42%
- McCain = 740 votes = 38.50%
- Paul = 78 votes = 4.06%
- Romney = 735 votes = 38.24%
- Thompson = 21 votes = 1.09%
- Other = 62 votes = 3.23%


Gilmanton - 840 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 76 votes = 9.05%
- Huckabee = 111 votes = 13.21%
- Hunter = 2 votes = 0.24%
- McCain = 300 votes = 35.71%
- Paul = 84 votes = 10.00%- Romney = 236 votes = 28.10%
- Thompson = 12 votes = 1.43%
- Other = 19 votes = 2.26%


Grantham - 645 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 53 votes = 8.22%
- Huckabee = 46 votes = 7.13%
- Hunter = 2 votes = 0.31%
- McCain = 299 votes = 46.36%
- Paul = 41 votes = 6.36%
- Romney = 199 votes = 30.85%
- Thompson = 5 votes = 0.78%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%

**** How many precincts have 0 (zero) 'Other votes'????


Greenland - 820 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 80 votes = 9.76%
- Huckabee = 70 votes = 8.54%
- Hunter = 2 votes = 0.24%
- McCain = 330 votes = 40.24%
- Paul = 39 votes = 4.76%
- Romney = 278 votes = 33.90%
- Thompson = 14 votes = 1.71%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.85%


Greenville - 144 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Giuliani = 16 votes = 11.11%
- Huckabee = 32 votes = 22.22%
- Hunter = 5 votes = 3.47%
- McCain = 86 votes = 59.72%
- Paul = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Romney = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Thompson = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Other = 5 votes = 3.47%


Hollis - 2,203 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 195 votes = 8.85%
- Huckabee = 156 votes = 7.08%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.32%
- McCain = 902 votes = 40.94%
- Paul = 124 votes = 5.63%
- Romney = 786 votes = 35.68%
- Thompson = 14 votes = 0.64%
- Other = 19 votes = 0.86%


Madison - 473 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 20 votes = 4.23%
- Huckabee = 40 votes = 8.46%
- Hunter = 5 votes = 1.06%
- McCain = 223 votes = 47.15%
- Paul = 52 votes = 10.99%
- Romney = 113 votes = 23.89%
- Thompson = 8 votes = 1.69%
- Other = 12 votes = 2.54%


Manchester - 15,067 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 1454 votes = 9.65%
- Huckabee = 1640 votes = 10.88%
- Hunter = 94 votes = 0.62%
- McCain = 5119 votes = 33.97%
- Paul = 1230 votes = 8.16%
- Romney = 4935 votes = 32.75%
- Thompson = 139 votes = 0.92%
- Other = 456 votes = 3.03%


To me, this is a BIG one!

I say this because there have been several days when I'd heare more than 1230 honks in a single afternoon during a sign wave. Of course this doesn't mean that they all voted, but multiple days of thousands of enthusiastic honks would yield more than 1230 votes!!!

The other precinct that I find rather unbelievable is Bedford:

Bedford - 6,048 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 579 votes = 9.57%
- Huckabee = 434 votes = 7.18%
- Hunter = 16 votes = 0.26%
- McCain = 2148 votes = 35.52%
- Paul = 263 votes = 4.35%
- Romney = 2479 votes = 40.99%
- Thompson = 51 votes = 0.84%
- Other = 78 votes = 1.29%


The reason I find this unbelievable is because I canvassed Bedford and I got an overwhelming positive reaction from the majority of people who were home!!!

That's enough for me now... we're working on several big plans to circumvent the media and inform millions of Americans about Dr. Paul's message.

Hunter

p.s. For the record, I think we should definitely have a recount... even if it is only for 2% increase. (I think it'll be more.)

 

[dannno]

+1

Great info on Bedford towards the end!! All you doubters give that section a read!! This is the kind of stuff I've been waiting to hear about!

 

[liberty_Forever]

bump

 

[Dave Pedersen]

Hampton - 3,141 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 286 votes = 9.11%
- Huckabee = 217 votes = 6.91%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.22%
- McCain = 1217 votes = 38.75%
- Paul = 144 votes = 4.58%
- Romney = 1217 votes = 38.75%
- Thompson = 22 votes = 0.70%
- Other = 31 votes = 0.99%


Payback for Tea Party??


***********


ugh.. no that was the 16th..

what significance is "217" or "1217"?

 

[brandon]

wow, sorry to be a prick, but your accusations are completely insane. I'm not saying vote fraud didn't occur, maybe it did. But the "evidence" you are presenting is laughable.

You really think there is some big grand conspiracy to steal the election from paul that involves a computer virus designed to give guiliani 9.11% of the vote??

 

[Molly1]

Can you show us again what towns gave Guiliani 9.11% of the votes?

Were those handcounted or diebold towns?

 

[A Ron Paul Rebel]

Can you show us again what towns gave Guiliani 9.11% of the votes?

Were those handcounted or diebold towns?

Campton - 604 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Giuliani = 55 votes = 9.11%
- Huckabee = 59 votes = 9.77%
- Hunter = 0 votes = 0.00%
- McCain = 252 votes = 41.72%
- Paul = 80 votes = 13.25%
- Romney = 124 votes = 20.53%
- Thompson = 10 votes = 1.66%
- Other = 24 votes = 3.97%


Hampton - 3,141 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 286 votes = 9.11%
- Huckabee = 217 votes = 6.91%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.22%
- McCain = 1217 votes = 38.75%
- Paul = 144 votes = 4.58%
- Romney = 1217 votes = 38.75%
- Thompson = 22 votes = 0.70%
- Other = 31 votes = 0.99%


Sandwich - 395 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Giuliani = 36 votes = 9.11%
- Huckabee = 33 votes = 8.35%
- Hunter = 0 votes = 0.00%
- McCain = 150 votes = 37.97%
- Paul = 25 votes = 6.33%
- Romney = 101 votes = 25.57%
- Thompson = 11 votes = 2.78%
- Other = 39 votes = 9.87%


The Ghoul is the only one who got ANY 9.11%... and he got 3 of them!!!

 

[Molly1]

Thank you for those towns.

Interesting that two of them are handcounted.

Now second question, were those towns among those watched by the people over at liberty watch or whatever their name is? I saw them post a list of towns they watched being handcounted, but i'll never find that post on here again.

 

[A Ron Paul Rebel]

Thank you for those towns.

Interesting that two of them are handcounted.

Now second question, were those towns among those watched by the people over at liberty watch or whatever their name is? I saw them post a list of towns they watched being handcounted, but i'll never find that post on here again.

I don't know, I haven't seen that thread.

 

[A Ron Paul Rebel]

blimp

 

[Sandra]

I DO know that evangelicals tend to play big into numbers. This may have been a way to snag some undecided evangelicals in FLA. "Wow! It's a sign from God!"

You'd be surprised how much marketing uses numbers to influence them. A lot of "worship centers" use them too, especially in their phone# and addresses.

 

[gold standard]

On the manual vote counts all you need for fraud is people with enough nerve to write down incorrect numbers.

 

[Paulbot_9876]

i do believe people will go to prison and that all the electronic voting machines will be removed after this recount....I just feel this is what is going to happen....