more interesting tweets about the lawsuit

[Origanalist]

I'm not so sure about any of this. It sounds fantastic, but would someone actually be tweeting this stuff? That and I just flat out don't trust the DOJ to do the right thing.

If Holder thinks it could help his master, then I can see it, but there has to be a plan b for these crooks. (Obama and crew)

 

[specsaregood]

Agreed, but only because of the unnecessary and unprofessional bombast. I could certianly see this all being true, though. In fact... isn't it? We basically do know that this stuff happened. While I'm not hopeful of a result that will be completely to our liking, I am certainly appreciative of anything that brings the ugly reality of what went down to light.

exactly my thoughts as well.

 

[coastie]

I'm not so sure about any of this. It sounds fantastic, but would someone actually be tweeting this stuff? That and I just flat out don't trust the DOJ to do the right thing.

If Holder thinks it could help his master, then I can see it, but there has to be a plan b for these crooks. (Obama and crew)

Eric Holder's Justice Department? Hmm, while this all sounds exciting, I am certainly not holding my breath.

 

[FSP-Rebel]

I'm just gonna employ the wait and see approach to this. With regards to the tweets, maybe our litigators know they have the operatives over a barrel and are being vindictive in adding insult to injury by making these yuppies sweat these felony charges as an epic "payback is a bitch" moment. These ops aren't hardened criminals and they likely thought that they were gonna complete their tasks with impunity and/or truly didn't understand that they were being played as patsies in the grand scheme of things. I think R-money will be safe but the others are likely in for a shocker. If we can't get any bankers in jail, it's nice to see the political class take a beating. If nothing else, it'll hopefully be an embarrassment that helps end their stranglehold over the GOP.

 

[Dutch]

USA_Patriot_Press ‏@USA_Free_Press
I informed the Mass hairman we will submit our evidence of harrassment to the DOJ for criminal prosecution


USA_Patriot_Press ‏@USA_Free_Press
On Sat I informed the Chairman of the Massachusetts GOP that there is a 5 year Federal Prison Sentence To anyone who intimidates a Delegate


USA_Patriot_Press ‏@USA_Free_Press
@traceywooldrid The Must Listen To Interview You Did Not Yet Hear- I Guarantee It !
http://player.vimeo.com/video/44236240

I added the interview, it got lost in the copy/paste. It's interesting and worth listening to!

 

[PatriotOne]

Been wondering the same thing, actually. It reads like he is one of the lawyers on the case...who else could withhold adding plaintiffs until after a "sting operation"? Like others though, I wish he would use a tad more finesse sometimes, regardless of who he is.

USA_Patriot_Press‏@USA_Free_Press

I am Honored to Announce That I have Been asked to be the Attorney of Record For The Federal Case and I have Accepted- Richard Gilbert

This is supposedly being tweeted by the Atty of Record and the guy doing all the interviews, etc.

This is not good. I'm back to my original suspicions that this was an attempt to "root out" our national delegates and/or bind them via the courts to Romney.

 

[specsaregood]

USA_Patriot_Press‏@USA_Free_Press
I am Honored to Announce That I have Been asked to be the Attorney of Record For The Federal Case and I have Accepted- Richard Gilbert
This is supposedly being tweeted by the Atty of Record and the guy doing all the interviews, etc.
This is not good. I'm back to my original suspicions that this was an attempt to "root out" our national delegates and/or bind them via the courts to Romney.

Even the name "USA_Patriot_Press‏" sounds like something a psyop would choose.

 

[FSP-Rebel]

Even the name "USA_Patriot_Press‏" sounds like something a psyop would choose.

Idk, if it was going in that direction I'd figure Jones would have something to say about it giving us a tip-off.

 

[KingNothing]

Even the name "USA_Patriot_Press‏" sounds like something a psyop would choose.

That would be one helluva genius move. I don't know if it is the kind of thing They are capable of doing.

 

[PatriotOne]

Idk, if it was going in that direction I'd figure Jones would have something to say about it giving us a tip-off.

Jone's is controlled opposition.

 

[PatriotOne]

That would be one helluva genius move. I don't know if it is the kind of thing They are capable of doing.

Pffftttt....of course they are capable. Though it may not be the Romney campaign doing it directly. May be another group protecting their "investment in Romney".

 

[brandon]

Sounds like the guy making these tweets is mentally ill.

 

[sailingaway]

I'm not so sure about any of this. It sounds fantastic, but would someone actually be tweeting this stuff? That and I just flat out don't trust the DOJ to do the right thing.

If Holder thinks it could help his master, then I can see it, but there has to be a plan b for these crooks. (Obama and crew)

to be honest, I trust the tweeter pretty much, I just don't think he is very high up. For example a fake Perot twitter account claimed it was going to donate tons to Ron Paul and he took it seriously. However, about the lawsuit so far everything he has said would happen procedurally did in fact happen when he said it would. I was posting this stuff in the mod forum for a couple of weeks before the suit was brought because I didn't know whether to believe it or not, and I didn't want to push rumors. Now I'm just letting people judge it all for themselves.

I still see where this COULD be some sort of incredibly twisted trap, but on the other hand SOMEONE needs to bring a suit on this. The fraud needs to get out.

 

[sailingaway]

I want to know 2 things from this "tweet"

1) He mentions DOJ involvement......Which branch?

2) Felonies, specifically which statutes is he speaking of?

In other tweets he mentioned RICO, lately he's been calling the Romney camp and RNC 'organized crime' so I think it is still RICO.

 

[Origanalist]

to be honest, I trust the tweeter pretty much, I just don't think he is very high up. For example a fake Perot twitter account claimed it was going to donate tons to Ron Paul and he took it seriously. However, about the lawsuit so far everything he has said would happen procedurally did in fact happen when he said it would.

I still see where this COULD be some sort of incredibly twisted trap, but on the other hand SOMEONE needs to bring a suit on this. The fraud needs to get out.

You're a lot more in the know than myself, hell I don't even tweet. It's good to hear you say this.

 

[sailingaway]

idk... I am having a hard time feeling the good vibe. Even if Romney is eliminated, that does not mean that Ron Paul slips in. I am sure the GOP has an army of candidates, who would love to be placed in nomination... now that all the hard campaigning is over.

It is still my hope that the delegates, when unbound, will do the right thing for America and choose Ron Paul. We have a chance, no one knows how much of a chance, but we still do have a chance.

Ron may not win, but the other good thing would be to show the parties for what they are (unfortunately this particular spotlight is only on the GOP.) But other tweets suggested that what they are after is unbinding Romney's delegates after which he does not have the number to win the nomination. Then they look for a brokered convention scenario where other candidates throw their hats in the ring to be the white knight. They hope for a split with candidates and that Ron can end up on top. Even if not on top, Ron having the second largest group of delegates would give opportunities (they don't say the last part, that is me). But I don't know about the unbind as a remedy, although I could see the courts trying to find some way to deal with this, IF they want to. There is a ton of evidence of fraud as people here know. My curiousity and tentative hope is more pinned on the RICO suit, as maybe actually changing the corrupt system, and giving grounds to ask for ballot access monopoly preferences to the two parties to be removed. But that is a remedy I would have chosen. Most complaints say 'or such other and further remedy as the Court finds proper' at the end, so they could still ask for it.

 

[sailingaway]

I'm just gonna employ the wait and see approach to this. With regards to the tweets, maybe our litigators know they have the operatives over a barrel and are being vindictive in adding insult to injury by making these yuppies sweat these felony charges as an epic "payback is a bitch" moment. These ops aren't hardened criminals and they likely thought that they were gonna complete their tasks with impunity and/or truly didn't understand that they were being played as patsies in the grand scheme of things. I think R-money will be safe but the others are likely in for a shocker. If we can't get any bankers in jail, it's nice to see the political class take a beating. If nothing else, it'll hopefully be an embarrassment that helps end their stranglehold over the GOP.

I think the person tweeting is hugely enthusiastic but junior, or maybe is several different people. He was tweeting about an investigation of Romney in Michigan etc before he was tweeting about this case.

 

[sailingaway]

USA_Patriot_Press‏@USA_Free_Press

I am Honored to Announce That I have Been asked to be the Attorney of Record For The Federal Case and I have Accepted- Richard Gilbert

This is supposedly being tweeted by the Atty of Record and the guy doing all the interviews, etc.

This is not good. I'm back to my original suspicions that this was an attempt to "root out" our national delegates and/or bind them via the courts to Romney.

that adds to my idea that more than one person uses this account. Sometimes he speaks from the persona of an attorney (Gilbert who has no bar violations listed in CA but also isn't an election attorney) and sometimes he speaks from the persona of a research assistant.

The idea is there are 500 'Lawyers for Ron Paul' and Gilbert was picked as the point person/firm. I have no idea how many people use the twitter account, but I can't imagine Gilbert himself (A name partner at a firm in Santa Ana, albeit not a huge one) thought the fake Perot twitter account saying he would donate big numbers to Ron was legitimate.

 

[sailingaway]

Even the name "USA_Patriot_Press‏" sounds like something a psyop would choose.

He was doing other activist stuff before this. At least someone at this account was, investigative stuff on the Romney subway sandwich thing. I am convinced the tweeters love Ron Paul. But I can't be sure there aren't more sinister people behind it, obviously. At some point, do we just let all this stuff go, though? Who else is bringing a law suit?

 

[sailingaway]

You're a lot more in the know than myself, hell I don't even tweet. It's good to hear you say this.

My being in the know only consists of me following this guy since he was putting in a ton of work investigating Romney in Michigan, before he started tweeting about this suit. I compared it to what happened procedurally in the news, and I looked up Gilbert in the bar database for ethical violations (none) and looked up his firm (not noting anything about elections on their areas of practice.) This is a bunch of attys who love Ron Paul being really pissed, if we take it at face value, and nothing I've seen so far from them contradicts that impression -- however, that doesn't mean I can vouch for them, I have lingering concerns of my own on the 'what if' front. All the same... I am REALLY pissed by what the GOP in various states have just been getting away with.