Money for "Paul-girl" video

aknappjr

Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
587
We need a video like the "Obama-girl" or the "Hot for Hillary" video. Its a way to get expensive MSM coverage. I think it should be classier than the Obama-girl video, but thats up to the creators.

If anyone needs funds for this, please contact me through meetup: http://ronpaul.meetup.com/50 (NYC). We can give payment after its made. Anyone know of exceptionally-attractive RP supporters?
 
Personally, I tend to think it's overdone by now. Everyone would just think it's trendy copycat stuff.

They wouldn't cover it anyway. Think about it. There are already so many Ron Paul videos that have gone viral on the 'net. Why hasn't the MSM picked up on any of them?
 
Personally, I tend to think it's overdone by now. Everyone would just think it's trendy copycat stuff.

They wouldn't cover it anyway. Think about it. There are already so many Ron Paul videos that have gone viral on the 'net. Why hasn't the MSM picked up on any of them?

I agree, someone needs to come up with something ORIGINAL...

As to why doesn't the MSM give him more coverage, well if any of you really don't know you need to learn before you die ! MIC (Mil.Ind,cplx) owns and/or controls the media. NOT ALL, just what matters...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pLRWiqNsnY&mode=related&search=
Who controls American media? The Definers...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo5CZvD3-QM
PleaseOppose these Candidates

http://www.grannywarriors.com/hillary.htm
A little humor to start your week

We have to use local media, grassroots & hopefully paid advertisements to defeat them. It CAN BE DONE !!!
 
Personally, I tend to think it's overdone by now. Everyone would just think it's trendy copycat stuff.
I'd agree on this. I was thinking on this and the issue of the depth of personal support for a candidate - I had a thought that wouldn't really work for much but seemed revealing-- while certainly not a "crush" several members here have flat out said they'd take a bullet for Dr. Paul... doesn't make for a catchy music video however. :D
 
I had a thought that wouldn't really work for much but seemed revealing-- while certainly not a "crush" several members here have flat out said they'd take a bullet for Dr. Paul... doesn't make for a catchy music video however. :D

I don't know, I bet the hip-hop crowd could find a way to work it. ;)
 
NO!

Take the High Road

Spoof It!

Hotties for Ron Paul...

The Granny Warriors!!

http://www.grannywarriors.com/


That's funny. Spoofing the Pin Up would be funny. I picture a dwarf campaiging, "Ron Paul for the little people-Against Big Governemt and Big Spending"


Jokes aside, I agree that we shouldn't be directly copying anything Hillary or Obama are doing. Its important to be a leader, when convincing people Paul makes for a Great Leader.

I am not opposed to the idea of a mascot/logo though. Mascotts/logos help with name recognition. I'd have to think on that one.

The rEVOLution signs are serving that purpose though.
 
That's funny. Spoofing the Pin Up would be funny. I picture a dwarf campaiging, "Ron Paul for the little people-Against Big Governemt and Big Spending"


Jokes aside, I agree that we shouldn't be directly copying anything Hillary or Obama are doing. Its important to be a leader, when convincing people Paul makes for a Great Leader.

I am not opposed to the idea of a mascot/logo though. Mascotts/logos help with name recognition. I'd have to think on that one.

The rEVOLution signs are serving that purpose though.

Yeah, but I am beginning to think the rEVOLution signs are purpetuating the 'fringe' candidate stigma. The idea that Ron Paul stands for revolution automatically separates him. Keep in mind, while people are 'unhappy' with government right now, they still love their country and do not feel a 'revolution' is neccisarry.

I think the big push from now on should be to make him appear more 'mainstream.' Seriously. My grandfather, a staunch conservative, has written Ron Paul off as a 'Yahoo'....a 'hippies candidate'....but he knows NOTHING about him at all....

This is bad. I am not trying to convince him or anything, but when people see 'revolution' flags, they think "BIG CHANGE...SCARY STUFF...OMG WE"RE GUNNA DIE....THOSE ARE TERRORISTS" and we should try to curb that to something else.


I think we should seriously latch onto "Hope For America" I think it's clean, has the same idea (but less in your face) and appeals to the traditional voter.

Those are my thoughts.

For a video like that, we should probably stay away from "Hot for anything' type stuff. Let's find a church choir somewhere that will sing for Ron Paul. Let's boost his 'traditions' image, let's boost his "American Values" image...

In short, we need to make him appear "Viable" and "Strong"....these are traits WE know he has, but we gotta figure out a way to fit it into a short (but entertaining) video....

How about a live action spoof of the debates? Make a 20 min video using college actors as candidates and dumb down the others and have Ron Paul give the honest and intelligent answers....in the spirit of Saturday Night Live or something....


Or even spoof muck-racking News Broadcasts....make them appear to look like MSM (CNN,FOX,ABC...whatever)....do a full frontal attack on MSM with parodies.... It would get tons of views (cause of the comedy) but also endorse Ron Paul...

Those are my ideas......
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but I am beginning to think the rEVOLution signs are purpetuating the 'fringe' candidate stigma. The idea that Ron Paul stands for revolution automatically separates him. Keep in mind, while people are 'unhappy' with government right now, they still love their country and do not feel a 'revolution' is neccisarry.

I think the big push from now on should be to make him appear more 'mainstream.' Seriously. My grandfather, a staunch conservative, has written Ron Paul off as a 'Yahoo'....a 'hippies candidate'....but he knows NOTHING about him at all....

This is bad. I am not trying to convince him or anything, but when people see 'revolution' flags, they think "BIG CHANGE...SCARY STUFF...OMG WE"RE GUNNA DIE....THOSE ARE TERRORISTS" and we should try to curb that to something else.


I think we should seriously latch onto "Hope For America" I think it's clean, has the same idea (but less in your face) and appeals to the traditional voter.

Those are my thoughts.

Yeah, exactly why I don't like the revolution signs...
 
I agree with the negative images asscociated with the word revolution. It makes me think of violence and more war, just what people do not want. Even though the word LOVE is highlighted in it, I don't know if people notice that is what is spelled if you read it backwards at a quick glance.

I agree, it does create a hippy type feel and that too turns older conservatives like my dad off. My dad still calls John Lennon a kook and trouble maker.

The revolution thing just seemed to take off and become to big now to try to change. If it's not broke, don't fix it. His support is growing with it. Those that feel it best represents them should keep using it.

My concern is, if kept with the revolution image soley, will his support stop growing when all revolutionary types are reached? I think they still make up the minority.

We can also come up with something more wholesome, inspirational and uplifting to resonate with a different type of person.

(not sure how to appeal to a neo con voter and stay true to representing RP) :confused:

Image concepting for Paul is tough because his following is truly very diverse.

Typically, with a product, you have a target market and want your promotional imaging to be something they want to identify and asscociate themselves with.

In this case, our target market is ALL of the U.S. citisens old enough to vote.

Either branch off catering to what appeals to smaller segments of society OR, find something people universally want to identify and asscociate themselves with.

Thats tough. I'll think on it overnight.

Branching off may be best. Beat them at their own game. It would be like how one comapnay owns 10 different brands of soda or media. Divide and conquer does seem to work.

Pauls political philosophies are difficult to sum up. The word U.S. Constitution, alone does it. The problem is, few Americans seem to know what is in it and more importantly WHY it was put there.



I appeal best to the asscociations with the Founding Father and Thomas Jefferson.

ABC did a poll for the 4th of July and found that the Founding Father are still very Popular with Americans. I don't think you can go wrong there.



Sometimes, I think of adding him to Mt Rushmore with a slogan that says,

Time for Another President We can truly Honor and Respect.

Mostly, the Ron Paul experience for me FEELS like-

" A breath of Fresh Air, In a Polluted Political Environment.

That may be a Universal One.


I do know that with sales, you have to get to peoples emotions, to get them to take action. I think its better to get them to FALL IN LOVE with Pauls message, honesty, sincereity and integrity then work to get them to HATE, the actions of his opposition.

True, Paul is Hope for America. The downside to me of using that, is that it has been used in presidential campaigns before and things are getting worse. I think, people may asscociate that Slogan with "same old meaningless rhetoric to get elected"


The other tough challenge if you go with Americana is that, people are not feeling to proud of being Americans anymore and there is growing distrusts of everything the flag and statue of Liberty, now stands for- War Mongering and Big Spending for Oil.

Many challenges to coming up with effective marketing to break through to the brainwashed mainstream, without loosing the integrity Paul stands for.

Oh well, just brainstorming here and glad to see others see that the revolution, may turn some off and may only take Pauls campaign so far.
 
Yeah, exactly why I don't like the revolution signs...

We're not talking about a bloody revolution, like the Revolutionary War, we're talking about a peaceful revolution. The word revolution, tells the powers that be that we are serious, and we're not going to put up with their bullshit any more. I'm angry with them. No one is going to convince me to be a pacifist sheep.
 
We're not talking about a bloody revolution, like the Revolutionary War, we're talking about a peaceful revolution. The word revolution, tells the powers that be that we are serious, and we're not going to put up with their bullshit any more. I'm angry with them. No one is going to convince me to be a pacifist sheep.

that's great...if your average American understood that.
 
we're talking about a peaceful revolution. I'm angry with them. No one is going to convince me to be a pacifist sheep.
:confused:

You have do better then that if you want to convince people we are talking about a peaceful revolution.;)

Where there is anger and oppositional forces (implied by the word), there may be violence and that scares some people.

Since when is a Ron Paul supporter a sheep? That word fits a Hillary supporter better.

Ron Paul prefers pacifist means himself.

Anyway, I think there is definetely a place for the revolution with LOVE it in marketing material. I won't deny anyone feeling the way you do and wanting to express it through a revolution of sorts movement at all.

I'm thinking there is also room for a message that reaches people fed up with ANYTHING having to do with war or implying war that says something to the effect of

A time for brains over a brawn,
A time for the U.S. to learn to get along.

A time for Ron Paul for President.


Something like that.
 
We need a video like the "Obama-girl" or the "Hot for Hillary" video. Its a way to get expensive MSM coverage. I think it should be classier than the Obama-girl video, but thats up to the creators.

If anyone needs funds for this, please contact me through meetup: http://ronpaul.meetup.com/50 (NYC). We can give payment after its made. Anyone know of exceptionally-attractive RP supporters?

OH MY GOD! LIL! YOU SHOULD DO THIS! AND CALL IT "GETTIN' ON RON" ;-P
 
I've thought about re-tooling my "It's Personal" thing into an e-Harmony spoof. (see youtube, ladyjade3)

I saw the interviews of the Giuliani girl and the Obama girl. They're pretty much dumb as a box of rocks. Do we want to be lumped in with them?

On the other hand, it CAN be great media. They get to show cleavage under the guise of "covering the news" and we get a chance to talk up our message, if we're intelligent enough to take advantage of the opportunity. Pardon the expression, but a little media/candidate tit-for-tat.

But its still debateable whether its the coverage we want at this point or not. So debate. I'm probably unfortunately the wrong person to put something together right now, but I'd be happy to consult off the record. :)
 
Sorry to get off topic, but ladyjade, can you tell us what happened with Operation Spooner? Why did you pull your video?
 
If Paul-girl existed I would like her to be totally banging, but dressed modestly. Talking only the issues.
 
Sorry to get off topic, but ladyjade, can you tell us what happened with Operation Spooner? Why did you pull your video?

National HQ took over, so my video was no longer really relevant. By all means tho - join the national effort! This is a positive development!
 
Back
Top