MONEY BOMB Tulsi Gabbard on 6/26/2019

[Krugminator2]

I could not think of a less worthy cause. This is the worst part of the original Ron Paul movement.

There are occasionally people who could use help financially on this forum or people who ran for Congress like Brett. Give them money.

"The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act,” would pay for health care by increasing taxes on the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans, create a progressive excise tax on payroll and self-employment, tax unearned income, and also tax stock and bond transactions (not just the gains from those transactions).' https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...elieve-where-the-candidate-stands-on-7-issues

I mistakenly said I might not vote for Trump. But statements like this why I will ultimately vote for him. I hate all of these Communists so much. It is cool she likes Snowden. Swell. What about the civil liberties of people who pay taxes.

 

[unknown]

Here are some examples:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

Dist.2: Tulsi Gabbard - 31%



[TABLE="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]H RES 397: NATO[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote Date: June 27, 2017[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote: AYE[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]

[/TD]
[TD]Bad Vote.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft, colspan: 4"]This legislation (H. Res. 397) “solemnly reaffirms the commitment of the United States to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s principle of collective defense as enumerated in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.” Under Article 5, the member nations of the NATO military alliance “agree that an armed attack against one or more of them ... shall be considered an attack against them all.”

The House passed H. Res. 397 on June 27, 2017 by a lopsided vote of 423 to 4 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the nays not only because the United States should stay clear of entangling alliances such as NATO, but also because the NATO provision that obligates the United States to go to war if any member of NATO is attacked undermines the provision in the U.S. Constitution that assigns to Congress the power to declare war. Moreover, the number of nations that the United States has pledged to defend under NATO has grown from 11 to 28 over the years, as the alliance itself has grown from 12 member nations (including the United States) when NATO was created in 1949 to 29 today. Although NATO was ostensibly formed to counter the threat from the Soviet bloc of nations, some of the nations the United States is now pledged to defend under NATO were once part of that bloc, including Albania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic (as part of Czechoslovakia), Hungary, Poland, and Romania.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]




[TABLE="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]H R 5293: Authorization for Use of Military Force[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote Date: June 16, 2016[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote: NAY[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]

[/TD]
[TD]Bad Vote.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft, colspan: 4"]During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill (H.R. 5293), Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment to prohibit the use of funds in the bill for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act. Enacted in the wake of 9/11, the AUMF authorized the president to “use all necessary and appropriate force” against the terrorists involved, as well as those who aided or harbored them. It was used as the authorization for U.S. military entry into Afghanistan in 2001, and over the years has also been invoked on other occasions by the executive branch to justify U.S. military intervention abroad.

The House rejected Lee’s amendment on June 16, 2016 by a vote of 146 to 274 (Roll Call 330). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because presidents have been able to claim broad authority to go to war whenever or wherever they choose under the AUMF, despite the fact that the Founding Fathers never intended for one man to make this decision, and under the Constitution only Congress may “declare war.”[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]





[TABLE="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]H R 4909: Use of Military Force[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote Date: May 18, 2016[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote: NAY[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]

[/TD]
[TD]Bad Vote.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft, colspan: 4"]During consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4909), Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment to repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that was enacted in 2001 for the purpose of authorizing U.S. military intervention in Afghanistan in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks. Since then, however, the AUMF has been invoked numerous times by the executive branch for U.S. military intervention not only in Afghanistan but elsewhere.

The House rejected Lee’s amendment on May 18, 2016 by a vote of 138 to 285 (Roll Call 210). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because presidents have been able to claim broad authority to go to war whenever or wherever they choose under the AUMF, despite the fact that the Founding Fathers never intended for one man to make this decision, and under the Constitution only Congress may “declare war.”


[TABLE="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]H RES 162: Calling on the President to provide Ukraine with military assistance to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote Date: March 23, 2015[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote: AYE[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]

[/TD]
[TD]Bad Vote.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft, colspan: 4"]Ukraine Military Aid.
House Resolution 162, which calls on the president "to provide Ukraine with military assistance to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity," allows President Obama to provide Ukraine with defensive weapons to defend against aggression from Russia.

The House adopted H. Res. 162 on March 23, 2015 by a vote of 348 to 48 (Roll Call 131). We have assigned pluses to the nays not only because foreign aid is unconstitutional but also because this bill would further interject the United States into a foreign conflict. Allowing the U.S. president to provide lethal arms to Ukraine in order to fight Russia is tantamount to waging a proxy war on Russia without the constitutionally required congressional declaration of war. The House, by giving such power to the president, is relinquishing one of its constitutional responsibilities.


[TABLE="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]H R 4870: On Agreeing to the Amendment 51 to H R 4870[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote Date: June 19, 2014[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote: NAY[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]

[/TD]
[TD]Bad Vote.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft, colspan: 4"]Weapons to Syrian Rebels.
During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill, Representative Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) introduced an amendment that would have prohibited any funding in the bill from being used to provide weapons to Syrian rebels. Fortenberry noted on the House floor that "the rebel movement is a battleground of shifting alliances and bloody conflicts between groups that now include multinational terrorist organizations," that "sending our weapons into this chaotic war zone could inadvertently help these extremists," and that "it has already happened." He added: "The naive notion that we can deliver weapons to vetted, moderate opposition groups at war with other rebel militias gives no guarantee that our weaponry won't be seized or diverted."

The House rejected Fortenberry's amendment on June 19, 2014 by a vote of 167 to 244 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because arming "moderate" rebels in a foreign country is tantamount to going to war, which would require a declaration of war by Congress. Also, the United States should follow the Founders' advice not to become involved in foreign quarrels[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]





[TABLE="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]H R 4152: To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote Date: April 1, 2014[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]Vote: AYE[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft"]

[/TD]
[TD]Bad Vote.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddingleft, colspan: 4"]Ukraine Aid.

This bill (H.R. 4152), as amended by the Senate (see Senate vote below), would provide $150 million for direct aid to Ukraine. It would also provide for loan guarantees (meaning that U.S. taxpayers would be stuck holding the bag if the loans are not paid). And it would impose sanctions on Russian and ex-Ukrainian officials deemed responsible for the crisis in the Ukraine.

[ The Senate version of this legislation - offered in the form of a substitute amendment to the House version, H.R. 4152 - would provide $150 million for direct aid to Ukraine. It would also provide for loan guarantees (meaning that the U.S. taxpayers would be stuck holding the bag if the loans are not paid). And it would impose sanctions on Russian and ex-Ukrainian officials deemed responsible for the crisis in the Ukraine. ]

The House voted for this legislation on April 1, 2014 by a vote of 378 to 34 (Roll Call 149). We have assigned pluses to the nays because foreign aid is unconstitutional. The rationale for providing U.S. aid to Ukraine is that the country needs our assistance to resist Russian hegemony and build "democracy." Yet the oligarchs wielding power in Ukraine are hardly "democrats," and (because money is fungible) U.S. assistance could effectively be funneled to Russia in the form of Ukrainian energy and debt payments.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

The link references a ton of different votes.

I need a list of the worst ones so I can roast the ******s on reddit.

Do my work slave!

 

[r3volution 3.0]

She has a pretty good anti-war/pro-civil-liberties record:

--voted to repeal the 2001 AUMF (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against aiding the Syrian rebels (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against US involvement in Yemen (same as Massie - Amash didn't vote)
--voted to restrict NSA spying (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted to end indefinite detention (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against the last 2 NDAAs (same as Amash and Massie)

https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/22/defense

She also talks the talk.

In light of her economic policies, I certainly won't be supporting her, but I do hope she helps wake the long-sleeping anti-war left.

 

[PAF]

You make it sound as if all good votes only hold the line when they can advance liberty.

I don't start to really like a Congressman until they are in the 80's but those in the mid 70's do some good and certainly slow down anything bad.

We can get more demanding as we get a higher average in Congress but that may take some time.

Well, considering I no longer vote national elections, have at it. It is the centralized government, written by centralists, that I oppose. No matter how you slice it, both parties are part of the same government that has been abusing personal liberties and individualism since pen hit the page.

If I see a Rand, Justin, Tom... as I did with Ron, I wish them all the hope. If folks are intent on voting in order to feel USA USA “proud” I at least try to steer them in the right direction, hoping someday they will figure it all out.

Perhaps now you will give me a + REP for this well thought out, truthful and eloquent post ;-)

 

[RonZeplin]

Tulsi Gabbard is the strongest anti-war, anti military industrial complex candidate running for president, endorsed by Ron Paul on foreign policy. Please donate to her campaign on 6/26/2019, the day she'll be debating others in the Democratic primary. Suggested donation is $26.

https://www.tulsi2020.com/

Learned about money bomb from:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFAQyZq0NqfCwVkRQoXpx0A/community

Tulsi is also against the drug war, pro criminal justice reform, and pro free speech to the point she'll drop charges on Snowden and Assange.

+rep

Better than Trump, Biden, Weld, Beto & Bernie.

 

[Swordsmyth]

+rep

Better than Trump, Biden, Weld, Beto & Bernie.

LOL

She attacked Trump for the Syria pullout.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

LOL

She attacked Trump for the Syria pullout.

Source?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Source?

[h=1]CFR Gabbard on Trump ending wars[/h]

 

[oyarde]

+rep

Better than Trump, Biden, Weld, Beto & Bernie.

Actually no different than biden , bernie or beto and never be as good as trump or probably even weld .

 

[oyarde]

She should be a non factor after two debates .

 

[r3volution 3.0]

CFR Gabbard on Trump ending wars

She said she opposed a hasty withdrawal, not opposed withdrawing altogether.

Who knows what that really means.

How would you explain her vote against arming the rebels?

 

[Swordsmyth]

She said she opposed a hasty withdrawal, not opposed withdrawing altogether.

Who knows what that really means.

That was the Neocon line at the time, it's one of their favorites, somehow it's never the right time to leave a war.

How would you explain her vote against arming the rebels?

When?
She voted to NOT Prohibit arming them in this vote:


[TABLE="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]H R 4870: On Agreeing to the Amendment 51 to H R 4870[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddinglef cms_table_t"]Vote Date: June 19, 2014[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddinglef cms_table_t"]Vote: NAY[/TD]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddinglef cms_table_t"]

[/TD]
[TD]Bad Vote.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_cms_table_paddinglef cms_table_t, colspan: 4"]Weapons to Syrian Rebels.
During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill, Representative Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) introduced an amendment that would have prohibited any funding in the bill from being used to provide weapons to Syrian rebels. Fortenberry noted on the House floor that "the rebel movement is a battleground of shifting alliances and bloody conflicts between groups that now include multinational terrorist organizations," that "sending our weapons into this chaotic war zone could inadvertently help these extremists," and that "it has already happened." He added: "The naive notion that we can deliver weapons to vetted, moderate opposition groups at war with other rebel militias gives no guarantee that our weaponry won't be seized or diverted."

The House rejected Fortenberry's amendment on June 19, 2014 by a vote of 167 to 244 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because arming "moderate" rebels in a foreign country is tantamount to going to war, which would require a declaration of war by Congress. Also, the United States should follow the Founders' advice not to become involved in foreign quarrels[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


Anything she says and does that is supposed to be anti-war is just a cover story, if elected she would be another hawk. (but probably one that made up excuses)

 

[r3volution 3.0]

When?

H Amdt 1141 to H J Res 124 (September 2014), to authorize aid to Syrian rebels, she voted nay

https://votesmart.org/bill/18860/49994/129306/authorizes-aid-to-syrian-opposition

As I mentioned, Amash and Massie voted the same way.

She voted to NOT Prohibit arming them in this vote

Evidently, and a few months before the above vote

Anything she says and does that is supposed to be anti-war is just a cover story, if elected she would be another hawk. (but probably one that made up excuses)

The record is conflicted.

In any event, I don't frankly care whether she really is a dove or not.

It's enough that she appears to be, if that helps revive similar sentiments in the Dem Party.

If she actually won (which we won't), she would at least be no worse than the average Dem/GOPer.

 

[PAF]

Ron suggested working with both parties. He believes there is little difference between the two. That does not necessarily mean endorsing or throwing money bombs. While she may have some ideals that align with some of ours, she is still an internal welfare supporter the same way the gop are external welfare supporters.

Her Freedom Index Score is 30% which is far, far, far below even tolerable.

 

[RonZeplin]

Beware the dancing Saudi-Israel Wahhabi Republicans.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Beware the dancing Saudi-Israel Wahhabi Republicans.

Tulsi is worse.

 

[Pauls' Revere]

Those in the mid 70's or above may be a net positive for liberty.

30% is a monster.

Is there a list of 70% or higher?

 

[loveshiscountry]

She has a pretty good anti-war/pro-civil-liberties record:

--voted to repeal the 2001 AUMF (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against aiding the Syrian rebels (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against US involvement in Yemen (same as Massie - Amash didn't vote)
--voted to restrict NSA spying (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted to end indefinite detention (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against the last 2 NDAAs (same as Amash and Massie)

https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/22/defense

She also talks the talk.

In light of her economic policies, I certainly won't be supporting her, but I do hope she helps wake the long-sleeping anti-war left.

June 2014 she votes against the AUMF
H Amdt 912 - Prohibits Funds from Being Used Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 - Yea

Same day votes to keep us in Iraq?
H Amdt 908 - Prohibits United States Combat Operations in Iraq - Nay

Amash and Massie voted Yea on 908

 

[Pauls' Revere]

Is there a list of 70% or higher?

Christ the entire Congress is f**ked.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

"The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution" rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. The percentages below are cumulative scores based on key votes from 1999 to June 2018. Click on a senator's or representative's name to get a detailed breakdown of his or her voting record.

Current Members of the 116th Congress

Alabama
Sen. Doug Jones - 20%
Sen. Richard Shelby - 64%
Dist.1: Bradley Byrne - 57%
Dist.2: Martha Roby - 55%
Dist.3: Mike Rogers - 55%
Dist.4: Robert Aderholt - 57%
Dist.5: Mo Brooks - 74%
Dist.6: Gary Palmer - 70%
Dist.7: Terri Sewell - 14%

Alaska
Sen. Dan Sullivan - 57%
Sen. Lisa Murkowski - 47%
Dist.: Don Young - 57%

Arizona
Dist.1: Tom O'Halleran - 18%
Dist.2: Ann Kirkpatrick - 22%
Dist.2: Martha McSally - 53%
Dist.3: Raul Grijalva - 31%
Dist.4: Paul Gosar - 80%
Dist.5: Andy Biggs - 90%
Dist.6: David Schweikert - 77%
Dist.7: Ruben Gallego - 18%
Dist.8: Debbie Lesko - 74%
Dist.9: Greg Stanton - N/A
Dist.9: Kyrsten Sinema - 20%

Arkansas
Sen. John Boozman - 56%
Sen. Tom Cotton - 62%
Dist.1: Eric Crawford - 58%
Dist.2: French Hill - 54%
Dist.3: Steve Womack - 54%
Dist.4: Bruce Westerman - 60%

California
Sen. Kamala Harris - 20%
Sen. Dianne Feinstein - 13%
Dist.1: Doug LaMalfa - 61%
Dist.2: Jared Huffman - 26%
Dist.3: John Garamendi - 17%
Dist.4: Tom McClintock - 86%
Dist.5: Mike Thompson - 20%
Dist.6: Doris Matsui - 21%
Dist.7: Ami Bera - 10%
Dist.8: Paul Cook - 55%
Dist.9: Jerry McNerney - 18%
Dist.10: Josh Harder - N/A
Dist.11: Mark DeSaulnier - 18%
Dist.12: Nancy Pelosi - 18%
Dist.13: Barbara Lee - 30%
Dist.14: Jackie Speier - 25%
Dist.15: Eric Swalwell - 22%
Dist.16: Jim Costa - 19%
Dist.17: Ro Khanna - 25%
Dist.18: Anna Eshoo - 21%
Dist.19: Zoe Lofgren - 25%
Dist.20: Jimmy Panetta - 18%
Dist.21: TJ Cox - N/A
Dist.22: Devin Nunes - 54%
Dist.23: Kevin McCarthy - 61%
Dist.24: Salud Carbajal - 14%
Dist.25: Katie Hill - N/A
Dist.26: Julia Brownley - 12%
Dist.27: Judy Chu - 25%
Dist.28: Adam Schiff - 19%
Dist.29: Tony Cardenas - 27%
Dist.30: Brad Sherman - 19%
Dist.31: Pete Aguilar - 12%
Dist.32: Grace Napolitano - 23%
Dist.33: Ted Lieu - 30%
Dist.34: Jimmy Gomez - 26%
Dist.35: Norma Torres - 14%
Dist.36: Raul Ruiz - 16%
Dist.37: Karen Bass - 25%
Dist.38: Linda Sanchez - 25%
Dist.39: Gilbert Cisneros - N/A
Dist.40: Lucille Roybal-Allard - 21%
Dist.41: Mark Takano - 28%
Dist.42: Ken Calvert - 52%
Dist.43: Maxine Waters - 27%
Dist.44: Nanette Barragán - 23%
Dist.45: Katie Porter - N/A
Dist.46: J. Correa - 25%
Dist.47: Alan Lowenthal - 23%
Dist.48: Harley Rouda - N/A
Dist.49: Mike Levin - N/A
Dist.50: Duncan Hunter - 68%
Dist.51: Juan Vargas - 22%
Dist.52: Scott Peters - 9%
Dist.53: Susan Davis - 17%

Colorado
Sen. Michael Bennet - 11%
Sen. Cory Gardner - 61%
Dist.1: Diana DeGette - 21%
Dist.2: Joe Neguse - N/A
Dist.3: Scott Tipton - 66%
Dist.4: Ken Buck - 75%
Dist.5: Doug Lamborn - 74%
Dist.6: Jason Crow - N/A
Dist.7: Ed Perlmutter - 17%

Connecticut
Sen. Richard Blumenthal - 14%
Sen. Christopher Murphy - 15%
Dist.1: John Larson - 22%
Dist.2: Joe Courtney - 19%
Dist.3: Rosa DeLauro - 21%
Dist.4: James Himes - 11%
Dist.5: Jahana Hayes - N/A

Delaware
Sen. Chris Coons - 11%
Sen. Thomas Carper - 14%
Dist.: Lisa Blunt Rochester - 10%

Florida
Sen. Marco Rubio - 68%
Dist.1: Matt Gaetz - 75%
Dist.2: Neal Dunn - 52%
Dist.3: Ted Yoho - 74%
Dist.4: John Rutherford - 50%
Dist.5: Al Lawson - 11%
Dist.6: Michael Waltz - N/A
Dist.7: Stephanie Murphy - 13%
Dist.8: Bill Posey - 82%
Dist.9: Darren Soto - 18%
Dist.10: Val Demings - 11%
Dist.11: Daniel Webster - 67%
Dist.12: Gus Bilirakis - 60%
Dist.13: Charlie Crist - 16%
Dist.14: Kathy Castor - 15%
Dist.15: Ross Spano - N/A
Dist.16: Vern Buchanan - 56%
Dist.17: W. Steube - N/A
Dist.18: Brian Mast - 48%
Dist.19: Francis Rooney - 58%
Dist.20: Alcee Hastings - 24%
Dist.21: Lois Frankel - 18%
Dist.22: Theodore Deutch - 17%
Dist.23: Debbie Wasserman Schultz - 14%
Dist.24: Frederica Wilson - 20%
Dist.25: Mario Diaz-Balart - 46%
Dist.26: Debbie Mucarsel-Powell - N/A
Dist.27: Donna Shalala - N/A

Georgia
Sen. David Perdue - 60%
Sen. John Isakson - 54%
Dist.1: Buddy Carter - 56%
Dist.2: Sanford Bishop - 30%
Dist.3: A. Ferguson - 56%
Dist.4: Henry Johnson - 20%
Dist.5: John Lewis - 26%
Dist.6: Lucy McBath - N/A
Dist.7: Rob Woodall - 65%
Dist.8: Austin Scott - 64%
Dist.9: Doug Collins - 61%
Dist.10: Jody Hice - 69%
Dist.11: Barry Loudermilk - 68%
Dist.12: Rick Allen - 58%
Dist.13: David Scott - 21%
Dist.14: Tom Graves - 69%

Hawaii
Sen. Brian Schatz - 12%
Sen. Mazie Hirono - 14%
Dist.1: Ed Case - 22%
Dist.2: Tulsi Gabbard - 30%

Idaho
Sen. James Risch - 77%
Sen. Michael Crapo - 68%
Dist.1: Russ Fulcher - N/A
Dist.2: Michael Simpson - 54%

Illinois
Sen. Richard Durbin - 13%
Sen. Tammy Duckworth - 13%
Dist.1: Bobby Rush - 24%
Dist.2: Robin Kelly - 22%
Dist.3: Daniel Lipinski - 20%
Dist.4: Jesús GarcÃ*a - N/A
Dist.5: Mike Quigley - 14%
Dist.6: Sean Casten - N/A
Dist.7: Danny Davis - 25%
Dist.8: Raja Krishnamoorthi - 15%
Dist.9: Janice Schakowsky - 24%
Dist.10: Bradley Schneider - 13%
Dist.11: Bill Foster - 14%
Dist.12: Mike Bost - 52%
Dist.13: Rodney Davis - 55%
Dist.14: Lauren Underwood - N/A
Dist.15: John Shimkus - 53%
Dist.16: Adam Kinzinger - 53%
Dist.17: Cheri Bustos - 15%
Dist.18: Darin LaHood - 58%

Indiana
Sen. Todd Young - 56%
Dist.1: Peter Visclosky - 26%
Dist.2: Jackie Walorski - 53%
Dist.3: Jim Banks - 65%
Dist.4: James Baird - N/A
Dist.5: Susan Brooks - 50%
Dist.6: Greg Pence - N/A
Dist.7: André Carson - 17%
Dist.8: Larry Bucshon - 58%
Dist.9: Trey Hollingsworth - 62%

Iowa
Sen. Charles Grassley - 62%
Sen. Joni Ernst - 56%
Dist.1: Abby Finkenauer - N/A
Dist.2: David Loebsack - 20%
Dist.3: Cynthia Axne - N/A
Dist.4: Steve King - 65%

Kansas
Sen. Jerry Moran - 64%
Sen. Pat Roberts - 60%
Dist.1: Roger Marshall - 56%
Dist.2: Steven Watkins - N/A
Dist.3: Sharice Davids - N/A
Dist.4: Ron Estes - 49%

Kentucky
Sen. Rand Paul - 94%
Sen. Mitch McConnell - 59%
Dist.1: James Comer - 58%
Dist.2: Brett Guthrie - 62%
Dist.3: John Yarmuth - 21%
Dist.4: Thomas Massie - 99%
Dist.5: Harold Rogers - 52%
Dist.6: Garland Barr - 55%

Louisiana
Sen. John Kennedy - 53%
Sen. Bill Cassidy - 63%
Dist.1: Steve Scalise - 68%
Dist.2: Cedric Richmond - 22%
Dist.3: Clay Higgins - 61%
Dist.4: Mike Johnson - 65%
Dist.5: Ralph Abraham - 60%
Dist.6: Garret Graves - 65%

Maine
Sen. Angus King - 15%
Sen. Susan Collins - 39%
Dist.1: Chellie Pingree - 27%
Dist.2: Jared Golden - N/A

Maryland
Sen. Chris Van Hollen - 20%
Sen. Benjamin Cardin - 17%
Dist.1: Andy Harris - 76%
Dist.2: C. Ruppersberger - 15%
Dist.3: John Sarbanes - 19%
Dist.4: Anthony Brown - 9%
Dist.5: Steny Hoyer - 16%
Dist.6: David Trone - N/A
Dist.7: Elijah Cummings - 22%
Dist.8: Jamie Raskin - 15%

Massachusetts
Sen. Edward Markey - 23%
Sen. Elizabeth Warren - 16%
Dist.1: Richard Neal - 20%
Dist.2: James McGovern - 26%
Dist.3: Lori Trahan - N/A
Dist.4: Joseph Kennedy - 22%
Dist.5: Katherine Clark - 27%
Dist.6: Seth Moulton - 13%
Dist.7: Ayanna Pressley - N/A
Dist.8: Stephen Lynch - 24%
Dist.9: William Keating - 21%

Michigan
Sen. Gary Peters - 16%
Sen. Debbie Stabenow - 17%
Dist.1: Jack Bergman - 54%
Dist.2: Bill Huizenga - 64%
Dist.3: Justin Amash - 94%
Dist.4: John Moolenaar - 53%
Dist.5: Daniel Kildee - 21%
Dist.6: Fred Upton - 48%
Dist.7: Tim Walberg - 62%
Dist.8: Elissa Slotkin - N/A
Dist.9: Andy Levin - N/A
Dist.10: Paul Mitchell - 53%
Dist.11: Haley Stevens - N/A
Dist.12: Debbie Dingell - 14%
Dist.13: Rashida Tlaib - N/A
Dist.14: Brenda Lawrence - 18%

Minnesota
Sen. Tina Smith - 25%
Sen. Amy Klobuchar - 10%
Dist.1: Jim Hagedorn - N/A
Dist.2: Angie Craig - N/A
Dist.3: Dean Phillips - N/A
Dist.4: Betty McCollum - 21%
Dist.5: Ilhan Omar - N/A
Dist.6: Tom Emmer - 65%
Dist.7: Collin Peterson - 47%
Dist.8: Pete Stauber - N/A

Mississippi
Sen. Roger Wicker - 53%
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith - 34%
Dist.1: Trent Kelly - 62%
Dist.2: Bennie Thompson - 26%
Dist.3: Michael Guest - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Palazzo - 60%

Missouri
Sen. Roy Blunt - 55%
Dist.1: Wm. Clay - 23%
Dist.2: Ann Wagner - 57%
Dist.3: Blaine Luetkemeyer - 62%
Dist.4: Vicky Hartzler - 56%
Dist.5: Emanuel Cleaver - 22%
Dist.6: Sam Graves - 56%
Dist.7: Billy Long - 60%
Dist.8: Jason Smith - 66%

Montana
Sen. Steve Daines - 65%
Sen. Jon Tester - 23%
Dist.: Greg Gianforte - 59%

Nebraska
Sen. Benjamin Sasse - 69%
Sen. Deb Fischer - 62%
Dist.1: Jeff Fortenberry - 56%
Dist.2: Don Bacon - 53%
Dist.3: Adrian Smith - 66%

Nevada
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto - 8%
Dist.1: Dina Titus - 18%
Dist.2: Mark Amodei - 57%
Dist.3: Jacky Rosen - 13%
Dist.3: Susie Lee - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Horsford - 20%

New Hampshire
Sen. Margaret Hassan - 13%
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen - 8%
Dist.1: Chris Pappas - N/A
Dist.2: Ann Kuster - 19%

New Jersey
Sen. Robert Menendez - 18%
Sen. Cory Booker - 16%
Dist.1: Donald Norcross - 14%
Dist.2: Jefferson Van Drew - N/A
Dist.3: Andy Kim - N/A
Dist.4: Christopher Smith - 45%
Dist.5: Josh Gottheimer - 16%
Dist.6: Frank Pallone - 25%
Dist.7: Tom Malinowski - N/A
Dist.8: Albio Sires - 15%
Dist.9: Bill Pascrell - 23%
Dist.10: Donald Payne - 20%
Dist.11: Mikie Sherrill - N/A
Dist.12: Bonnie Watson Coleman - 25%

New Mexico
Sen. Martin Heinrich - 13%
Sen. Tom Udall - 20%
Dist.1: Debra Haaland - N/A
Dist.2: Xochitl Torres Small - N/A
Dist.3: Ben Lujan - 18%

New York
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand - 15%
Sen. Charles Schumer - 14%
Dist.1: Lee Zeldin - 59%
Dist.2: Peter King - 45%
Dist.3: Thomas Suozzi - 18%
Dist.4: Kathleen Rice - 10%
Dist.5: Gregory Meeks - 20%
Dist.6: Grace Meng - 22%
Dist.7: Nydia Velázquez - 26%
Dist.8: Hakeem Jeffries - 23%
Dist.9: Yvette Clarke - 26%
Dist.10: Jerrold Nadler - 24%
Dist.11: Max Rose - N/A
Dist.12: Carolyn Maloney - 22%
Dist.13: Adriano Espaillat - 18%
Dist.14: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - N/A
Dist.15: José Serrano - 24%
Dist.16: Eliot Engel - 19%
Dist.17: Nita Lowey - 15%
Dist.18: Sean Maloney - 18%
Dist.19: Antonio Delgado - N/A
Dist.20: Paul Tonko - 23%
Dist.21: Elise Stefanik - 42%
Dist.22: Anthony Brindisi - N/A
Dist.23: Tom Reed - 57%
Dist.24: John Katko - 50%
Dist.25: Joseph Morelle - N/A
Dist.26: Brian Higgins - 17%
Dist.27: Chris Collins - 53%

North Carolina
Sen. Richard Burr - 57%
Sen. Thom Tillis - 50%
Dist.1: George Butterfield - 17%
Dist.2: George Holding - 64%
Dist.3: Walter Jones - 81%
Dist.4: David Price - 19%
Dist.5: Virginia Foxx - 68%
Dist.6: Bradley Walker - 65%
Dist.7: David Rouzer - 59%
Dist.8: Richard Hudson - 61%
Dist.10: Patrick McHenry - 67%
Dist.11: Mark Meadows - 72%
Dist.12: Alma Adams - 13%
Dist.13: Ted Budd - 73%

North Dakota
Sen. John Hoeven - 52%
Dist.: Kevin Cramer - 53%
Dist.: Kelly Armstrong - N/A

Ohio
Sen. Robert Portman - 50%
Sen. Sherrod Brown - 22%
Dist.1: Steve Chabot - 64%
Dist.2: Brad Wenstrup - 61%
Dist.3: Joyce Beatty - 18%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan - 81%
Dist.5: Robert Latta - 67%
Dist.6: Bill Johnson - 57%
Dist.7: Bob Gibbs - 60%
Dist.8: Warren Davidson - 70%
Dist.9: Marcy Kaptur - 29%
Dist.10: Michael Turner - 49%
Dist.11: Marcia Fudge - 21%
Dist.12: Troy Balderson - 40%
Dist.13: Tim Ryan - 25%
Dist.14: David Joyce - 53%
Dist.15: Steve Stivers - 53%
Dist.16: Anthony Gonzalez - N/A

Oklahoma
Sen. James Lankford - 66%
Sen. James Inhofe - 70%
Dist.1: Kevin Hern - N/A
Dist.2: Markwayne Mullin - 63%
Dist.3: Frank Lucas - 58%
Dist.4: Tom Cole - 53%
Dist.5: Kendra Horn - N/A

Oregon
Sen. Ron Wyden - 18%
Sen. Jeff Merkley - 17%
Dist.1: Suzanne Bonamici - 20%
Dist.2: Greg Walden - 49%
Dist.3: Earl Blumenauer - 23%
Dist.4: Peter DeFazio - 31%
Dist.5: Kurt Schrader - 23%

Pennsylvania
Sen. Patrick Toomey - 67%
Sen. Robert Casey - 11%
Dist.1: Brian Fitzpatrick - 30%
Dist.2: Brendan Boyle - 18%
Dist.3: Dwight Evans - 12%
Dist.4: Madeleine Dean - N/A
Dist.5: Mary Scanlon - N/A
Dist.6: Chrissy Houlahan - N/A
Dist.7: Susan Wild - N/A
Dist.8: Matthew Cartwright - 24%
Dist.9: Daniel Meuser - N/A
Dist.10: Scott Perry - 74%
Dist.11: Lloyd Smucker - 60%
Dist.13: John Joyce - N/A
Dist.14: Guy Reschenthaler - N/A
Dist.15: Glenn Thompson - 61%
Dist.16: Mike Kelly - 56%
Dist.17: Conor Lamb - 27%
Dist.18: Michael Doyle - 29%

Rhode Island
Sen. John Reed - 14%
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse - 12%
Dist.1: David Cicilline - 25%
Dist.2: James Langevin - 19%

South Carolina
Sen. Tim Scott - 69%
Sen. Lindsey Graham - 60%
Dist.1: Joe Cunningham - N/A
Dist.2: Joe Wilson - 59%
Dist.3: Jeff Duncan - 80%
Dist.4: William Timmons - N/A
Dist.5: Ralph Norman - 69%
Dist.6: James Clyburn - 21%
Dist.7: Tom Rice - 61%

South Dakota
Sen. Mike Rounds - 47%
Sen. John Thune - 58%
Dist.: Dusty Johnson - N/A

Tennessee
Sen. Lamar Alexander - 51%
Dist.1: David Roe - 68%
Dist.2: Tim Burchett - N/A
Dist.3: Charles Fleischmann - 61%
Dist.4: Scott DesJarlais - 75%
Dist.5: Jim Cooper - 21%
Dist.6: John Rose - N/A
Dist.7: Marsha Blackburn - 64%
Dist.7: Mark Green - N/A
Dist.8: David Kustoff - 53%
Dist.9: Steve Cohen - 22%

Texas
Sen. John Cornyn - 65%
Sen. Ted Cruz - 75%
Dist.1: Louie Gohmert - 78%
Dist.2: Dan Crenshaw - N/A
Dist.3: Van Taylor - N/A
Dist.4: John Ratcliffe - 68%
Dist.5: Lance Gooden - N/A
Dist.6: Ron Wright - N/A
Dist.7: Lizzie Fletcher - N/A
Dist.8: Kevin Brady - 56%
Dist.9: Al Green - 23%
Dist.10: Michael McCaul - 59%
Dist.11: K. Conaway - 60%
Dist.12: Kay Granger - 52%
Dist.13: Mac Thornberry - 54%
Dist.14: Randy Weber - 69%
Dist.15: Vicente Gonzalez - 33%
Dist.16: Veronica Escobar - N/A
Dist.17: Bill Flores - 62%
Dist.18: Sheila Jackson-Lee - 24%
Dist.19: Jodey Arrington - 58%
Dist.20: Joaquin Castro - 23%
Dist.21: Chip Roy - N/A
Dist.22: Pete Olson - 67%
Dist.23: Will Hurd - 54%
Dist.24: Kenny Marchant - 66%
Dist.25: Roger Williams - 67%
Dist.26: Michael Burgess - 69%
Dist.27: Michael Cloud - 67%
Dist.28: Henry Cuellar - 25%
Dist.29: Sylvia Garcia - N/A
Dist.30: Eddie Johnson - 19%
Dist.31: John Carter - 56%
Dist.32: Colin Allred - N/A
Dist.33: Marc Veasey - 23%
Dist.34: Filemon Vela - 25%
Dist.35: Lloyd Doggett - 25%
Dist.36: Brian Babin - 63%

Utah
Sen. Mike Lee - 92%
Dist.1: Rob Bishop - 66%
Dist.2: Chris Stewart - 60%
Dist.3: John Curtis - 58%
Dist.4: Ben McAdams - N/A

Vermont
Sen. Patrick Leahy - 16%
Sen. Bernard Sanders - 28%
Dist.: Peter Welch - 26%

Virginia
Sen. Mark Warner - 11%
Sen. Timothy Kaine - 8%
Dist.1: Robert Wittman - 64%
Dist.2: Elaine Luria - N/A
Dist.3: Robert Scott - 23%
Dist.4: A. McEachin - 8%
Dist.5: Denver Riggleman - N/A
Dist.6: Ben Cline - N/A
Dist.7: Abigail Spanberger - N/A
Dist.8: Donald Beyer - 15%
Dist.9: H. Griffith - 76%
Dist.10: Jennifer Wexton - N/A
Dist.11: Gerald Connolly - 16%

Washington
Sen. Maria Cantwell - 14%
Sen. Patty Murray - 12%
Dist.1: Suzan DelBene - 20%
Dist.2: Rick Larsen - 18%
Dist.3: Jaime Herrera Beutler - 64%
Dist.4: Dan Newhouse - 56%
Dist.5: Cathy McMorris Rodgers - 61%
Dist.6: Derek Kilmer - 18%
Dist.7: Pramila Jayapal - 21%
Dist.8: Kim Schrier - N/A
Dist.9: Adam Smith - 21%
Dist.10: Denny Heck - 15%

West Virginia
Sen. Shelley Capito - 48%
Sen. Joe Manchin - 31%
Dist.1: David McKinley - 60%
Dist.2: Alex Mooney - 73%
Dist.3: Carol Miller - N/A

Wisconsin
Sen. Ron Johnson - 69%
Sen. Tammy Baldwin - 25%
Dist.1: Bryan Steil - N/A
Dist.2: Mark Pocan - 32%
Dist.3: Ron Kind - 23%
Dist.4: Gwen Moore - 25%
Dist.5: F. Sensenbrenner - 77%
Dist.6: Glenn Grothman - 63%
Dist.7: Sean Duffy - 63%
Dist.8: Mike Gallagher - 58%

Wyoming
Sen. Michael Enzi - 69%
Sen. John Barrasso - 71%
Dist.: Liz Cheney - 62%

 

[Swordsmyth]

Is there a list of 70% or higher?

Dist.5: Mo Brooks - 74%
Dist.4: Paul Gosar - 80%
Dist.5: Andy Biggs - 90%
Dist.6: David Schweikert - 77%
Dist.8: Debbie Lesko - 74%
Dist.4: Tom McClintock - 86%
Dist.4: Ken Buck - 75%
Dist.5: Doug Lamborn - 74%
Dist.11: Mark Meadows - 72%
Dist.13: Ted Budd - 73%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan - 81%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan - 81%
Dist.8: Warren Davidson - 70%
Dist.8: Bill Posey - 82%
Sen. James Inhofe - 70%
Dist.10: Scott Perry - 74%
Sen. James Risch - 77%
Dist.3: Jeff Duncan - 80%
Dist.4: Scott DesJarlais - 75%
Sen. Ted Cruz - 75%
Dist.1: Louie Gohmert - 78%
Sen. Rand Paul - 94%
Dist.4: Thomas Massie - 99%
Sen. Mike Lee - 92%
Dist.1: Andy Harris - 76%
Dist.9: H. Griffith - 76%
Dist.3: Justin Amash - 94%
Dist.2: Alex Mooney - 73%
Dist.5: F. Sensenbrenner - 77%
Sen. John Barrasso - 71%

There are quite a few without enough of a record yet right now but most of them probably won't work out.

Source: https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index