A Son of Liberty
Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 6,514
Modern art is an utter travesty.
Modern art is an utter travesty.
Back during my impetuous youth, a group of us took LSD (that's Lake Shore Drive to you) and visited the Art Institute of Chicago. We walked in and saw Red Plank proudly displayed.
Modern art is an utter travesty.
So when the time came, which is now, nobody would lift a finger to defend it.
Marxism.
I hate to inject politics into such a question, but I did not do it, our enemies did.
Art, literature, music, architecture...there is not a single endeavor that the Marxists have left untouched.
It is ugly, vapid, profane and distasteful for a reason, to make you, and your fellow citizens hate yourself and the culture which created this trash.
So when the time came, which is now, nobody would lift a finger to defend it.
YOU didn't inject politics into it, my man. THEY did.
I visited Prague in 1996, just 6-7 years after the fall.
The MOST noticeable thing about Prague, besides the old town - Charles Bridge, St. Vitus Cathedral - was the GAWD AWFUL architecture of the city! We stayed in a college dormitory (it was summer when we were there), and it was like living in a nuclear bunker - concrete, austere, inhuman. This is what "theire" (to borrow the phrase from [MENTION=25257]osan[/MENTION]) "art" is... it lacks heart. It lacks humanity. It is intended specifically to break you from your passion, from your heart. It is utter and complete garbage.
It is, to any objective eye, an utter moral travesty. Jackson Pollack? Garbage. These modern so-called artists, who effectively vomit on a piece of canvas and we're supposed to rub our chins and imagine some kind of intent? NO, go fck yourselves. You're not saying anything. The only possible thing I can get out of modern art is that it is a statement on the utter chaos and calamity that is modern society. It is not redeeming, or soothing, or compelling in and of itself... it's - at best - a desperate cry for help in a modern world which is effectively, figuratively and literally collapsing before our very eyes. It is the SCREAM as western civilization slips into the abyss. That's all it is. It's the last, desperate throes of a civilization DYING, not thriving. It's sad, but it's definitely not beautiful.
That is 100 percent correct.
I owe you a rep
Where are all the bums with their rear-ends hanging out of the back of their pants?
Oh, never mind... this was from a time when people held themselves in regard, regardless of their social status, and believed in presenting themselves like dignified human beings in public, rather than slovenly bums who couldn't care less about how they presented themselves to the world.
I'll bring this into it, there are too many people on the planet and nature, or as you may see it, God, has funny ways of solving that problem.
Unlike the 1940s.
![]()
YOU didn't inject politics into it, my man. THEY did.
I visited Prague in 1996, just 6-7 years after the fall.
The MOST noticeable thing about Prague, besides the old town - Charles Bridge, St. Vitus Cathedral - was the GAWD AWFUL architecture of the city!
It is, to any objective eye, an utter moral travesty. Jackson Pollack? Garbage. These modern so-called artists, who effectively vomit on a piece of canvas and we're supposed to rub our chins and imagine some kind of intent? NO, go fck yourselves. You're not saying anything. The only possible thing I can get out of modern art is that it is a statement on the utter chaos and calamity that is modern society.
It is not redeeming, or soothing, or compelling in and of itself...
There are several place like that in Hungary. Veszprém is one. There is another I saw in the eastern end by Miskolc... I cannot for the life of me recall the name, though in the day it was something like Stalin City. It was one of the most depressing sights imaginable, making Detroit look like a cheerful, life-filled place. Gray concrete blocks in the Bauhaus style, minus whatever thin slice of god there may be i that bakrupt expression of the communist "aesthetic". <BARF>
So called "modern art" was the invention of the left. Dadaism, cubism, and so forth down the line of that tediously timid ilk, all arose from the stilted creative intellects of the disaffected, disenfranchised vermin that included Picasso, who was a supremely talented artist who went down that path of dreary dullness on the false belief that they were blazing new trails when in fact all they were doing was demoting themselves to finger painters of a third-rate status.
It is always amusing to watch people so desperate to be different that they and everyone in the group in which they hang end up all being fungible. Tattoos come to mind, as do Goths.
It was never meant to be any of those things... save compelling in that it is all intended to put people off-balance; to wreck their frames of reference that orient them to reality. The intention is nothing less that the pure and utter destruction of common perception such that people have no ability to render powerful judgments. If everything is relative, there is no right, no wrong, up or down. It's all good, which is precisely what Theye want people to think. We are living the greatest psyop ever.
I'll bring this into it, there are too many people on the planet and nature, or as you may see it, God, has funny ways of solving that problem.
Let the record show that I was faithfully paying the pic tax all along.
Collaborator.
Modern art is an utter travesty.
Collaborator.