hazek
Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
- Messages
- 4,688
I think they are much too optimistic and Mr. Martenson below is closer to the mark:
Definitely +1.
I think they are much too optimistic and Mr. Martenson below is closer to the mark:
A global economic collapse is a "Welcome to Liberty" event. The amount of wealth doesn't change. The only thing that changes is who is wealthy. Welcome it... embrace it... love it. The Golden Rule: "He who owns the gold makes the rules." Own some gold, some land, some heirloom seeds, and some ammo. Become wealthy.. bring the house down. End The Fed.
I wonder that too. However, Chris Martenson was quite convincing with his analogy of bringing the hands together with the magnets. Linear thinking is natural. Exponential thinking is much more challenging. Time will tell.Some of the people on the You Tube video seem to think that Martenson is a lying corporate owned puppet and he is trying to convince people to accept the idea of $8 a gallon gas.
MIT researchers predict ‘global economic collapse’ by 2030
I highly doubtful we'll make it till 2030 without a major collapse. I see it more likely happening in the next 5-7 years.
WARNING! The Club of Rome is affiliated with The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Richard Haas, and other eugenicists. They plan to implement global governance by fear-mongering, whereby people gradually give up their liberties in exchange for security from perceived threats. In “The First Global Revolution” (1991) published by the Club of Rome, it states that ,“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” These monsters plan to reduce the world's population by 80%, then enslave the remaining sheeple.
Exponential growth just like your graph.What is this?
I think they are much too optimistic and Mr. Martenson below is closer to the mark:
I think they are much too optimistic and Mr. Martenson below is closer to the mark:
Exponential growth just like your graph.
Watch This!
It is worth the hour.
I'll suggest that you watch this series - http://www.youtube.com/show?p=dF9tP5oI9HY&tracker=show_avWithout reading the actual study, I'm going to call it garbage assuming this sentence reflects it accurately.
As available resources decline and the price of those resources begins to rise, alternatives will become economically viable and R&D investment will grow until new, more efficient technologies are developed.
I'll suggest that you watch this series - http://www.youtube.com/show?p=dF9tP5oI9HY&tracker=show_av
But at the least entertain this one...................
Before you toss out this study.