Captain Shays
Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,368
First. He failed to show the hypocrisy of those who say they are pro life and yet favor a preemptive attack on aq country that has never threatened us or attacked us, especially with nuclear weapons.
Second. The question relative to Bush's worst failure. His answer should have been more precise and definitive about going into Iraq and forgetting all about Osama bin Laden. If he ants to show his strength and win lots of voters here in the South Jersey-Philadelphia area, he NEEDS to stress his desire to go get bin Laden. Most Americans deep down want his ass either dead or languishing in our worst prison being the wife of Bubba the rest of his days.l The Bush administration has out sourced our capture of bin Laden to Muscharif who has incidently made a deal with the tribal leaders where bin Laden is, to leave them alone if they leave him alone effectively doing nothing to get bin Laden.
Third.
We've heard a million times how our interventionist foreign policy costs us money and erodes our position of respect in the world, but he needs to stress how constant war is also costing us our liberty. The police state issue in connection to the constant war is a real hit home matter with freedom loving Americans who see our freedoms disappearing and Ron Paul is THE strongest on that issue.
Fourth. Ron Paul is also THE strongest on border security and he needs to make his points very clear while stressing security first. But he failed to make it known how stupid it is for these other frauds to imply that when they speek of a verifiable ID for immigrants, that it cannot and will not ever work unless we all have to carry one with us when applying for a job and we won't be able to work if we don't have one. Its easy. If that wasn't the case and only immigrants would have to carry one and not citizens, then all they would have to say, is that they are a citizen so they don't need one right? How stupid do these people think we are? Ron Paul shouldn't let them off the hook that easy about the real issue, which is the REAL ID Act--National ID card that every man woman and child will have to carry some day if these globalists get their way. Again, he needs to hammer home his position on preserving our individual liberty and resisting the emergence of the police state. Its an underlying issue with lots of Americans and no one is talking about it unless they are trying to convince us to give up more liberty for security. Thats his strength and he needs to show it whether they give him the time or not in the next debate--IF they let him into it.
Second. The question relative to Bush's worst failure. His answer should have been more precise and definitive about going into Iraq and forgetting all about Osama bin Laden. If he ants to show his strength and win lots of voters here in the South Jersey-Philadelphia area, he NEEDS to stress his desire to go get bin Laden. Most Americans deep down want his ass either dead or languishing in our worst prison being the wife of Bubba the rest of his days.l The Bush administration has out sourced our capture of bin Laden to Muscharif who has incidently made a deal with the tribal leaders where bin Laden is, to leave them alone if they leave him alone effectively doing nothing to get bin Laden.
Third.
We've heard a million times how our interventionist foreign policy costs us money and erodes our position of respect in the world, but he needs to stress how constant war is also costing us our liberty. The police state issue in connection to the constant war is a real hit home matter with freedom loving Americans who see our freedoms disappearing and Ron Paul is THE strongest on that issue.
Fourth. Ron Paul is also THE strongest on border security and he needs to make his points very clear while stressing security first. But he failed to make it known how stupid it is for these other frauds to imply that when they speek of a verifiable ID for immigrants, that it cannot and will not ever work unless we all have to carry one with us when applying for a job and we won't be able to work if we don't have one. Its easy. If that wasn't the case and only immigrants would have to carry one and not citizens, then all they would have to say, is that they are a citizen so they don't need one right? How stupid do these people think we are? Ron Paul shouldn't let them off the hook that easy about the real issue, which is the REAL ID Act--National ID card that every man woman and child will have to carry some day if these globalists get their way. Again, he needs to hammer home his position on preserving our individual liberty and resisting the emergence of the police state. Its an underlying issue with lots of Americans and no one is talking about it unless they are trying to convince us to give up more liberty for security. Thats his strength and he needs to show it whether they give him the time or not in the next debate--IF they let him into it.
