Missouri Police Report: RP supporters, Libertarians, anti-NWO movement are TERRORISTS

[torchbearer]

This kind of crap leads me to believe that there will be no peaceful revolution.

 

[sluggo]

This kind of crap leads me to believe that there will be no peaceful revolution.

Learn to laugh at them. Seriously.

 

[torchbearer]

Learn to laugh at them. Seriously.

Hard to laugh when they are working you over in the back room of a club for doing nothing but having a ron paul bumper sticker.

 

[The One]

Hard to laugh when they are working you over in the back room of a club for doing nothing but having a ron paul bumper sticker.

You beat me to it.

 

[paulitics]

This is a good thing that this information is getting out now. It's a bad thing that this is legit.
I'm pretty pissed, but I'm not surprised this is going on. Read the whole thing, not just the part about Ron Paul, Bob Barr supproters.

Pay particular attention to how they try and insinuate that we are racists. If you are aware of the global elite and believe in national sovereignty, you must somehow be a racist. The ironic thing, is that what it does is stereotype a profile us as a bunch of angry white male extremists. Look at the pictures they use, and pay particular attention to the wording. It is in itself very biased, and is inspiring hatred against us with those who have the authority to use force.

 

[sluggo]

Getting agitated and froggy about it will inevitably play into their hands, justifying their laughable "profile" of RP supporters/constitutionalists as being dangerous wackos.

Be aware, yes. Be concerned, yes. But don't let this bait you into a fight you can't win.

Just saying.

 

[Dripping Rain]

Getting agitated and froggy about it will inevitably play into their hands, justifying their laughable "profile" of RP supporters/constitutionalists as being dangerous wackos.

Be aware, yes. Be concerned, yes. But don't let this bait you into a fight you can't win.

Just saying.

+1
dont worry. the people here are way smarter than that. they know its a trap to polarize RP supporters and LEOs and pit them against each other

 

[Dripping Rain]

Notice that the group that drafted this isnt the government
its a private group according to what i understand that takes talking points from ADL & SPLC and feeds it to LEO's
this is worst than the FED

 

[Sandra]

So far all I've seen is:
- Yes, the number is indeed valid. No surprise there.
- Somebody answered the phone. No surprise there.
- The person who answered the phone was aware of this memo circulating. No surprise there.

What I have NOT seen is:
- The organization confirms that this document came from them (so far all we have is "The woman who answered said she was aware that a memo was put out implicating Ron Paul and Bob Barr supporters" .. but who put it out?).
- The organization stands behind the document
or
- The organization has apologized.

Until they confirm that it came from them and either apologize or stand behind it then it's premature to get worked up about it.

I still lean towards the hoax side on this one.. I might be wrong, but it would take me maybe an hour at the most to gather up the images and create a PDF exactly like this. It's not rocket science. An hour to create something that would cause mayhem amongst the Paul supporters?... I know of at least two groups online that would do this just to watch the Paul supporters get upset.

+1!

 

[Sandra]

Beware of new members with sudden interest, forum shifters, just sayin'.

 

[Mini-Me]

This is very disturbing, and frankly, I don't even know how to best address it. This particular memo/training document is really devious and sinister, and I think the people behind it were quite a bit more clever than mere idiots with a 4th grade education, spelling issues notwithstanding. The memo brings up a whole bunch of serious issues that many Ron Paul supporters really are concerned about - such as civil unrest, the NAU, the Federal Reserve, RFID, universal citizen service (involuntary servitude), the NWO, FEMA camps, etc. - and then attributes these concerns to "dangerous militia groups" (rather than grass roots activist groups), tying us in directly by linking us to these supposed milita groups. At the same time, those issues are described with undertones implying they're not actually a threat, giving the impression that the "right-wing militia groups" concerned about them are just plain crazy. ...and it goes without saying that the memo paints all real militia groups in a poor light too, which is hardly fair.

On top of that, check out the "You are the Enemy" section: This memo is taking advantage of widespread mistrust of police and anger at the police brutality epidemic*, painting mistrustful attitudes as a reason for them to be afraid of us! That's a really frightening way to twist the reality of the situation: A growing number of people (including many of us) are beginning to view cops warily due to the way they (as a whole) have been treating everyone else...and somehow, that supposedly makes us a threat to their safety?!? If these memos become standard issue, even the honest cops are liable to be more on-edge and trigger-happy around people with RP or CFL bumper stickers (let alone something like the Gadsden Flag)...and who knows what kind of abuses the bully cops might find new excuses for.

Unfortunately, the memo is chock full of dangerous half-truths, and these half-truths may be very convincing to the average person (and definitely to the average police officer). I do think acptulsa is correct when he says we need to bring this into the court of public opinion, and the Niemöller quote is very poignant here...but the problem is, because of the devious half-truth nature of the memo, it might be harder than many of us here realize to make sure public opinion falls on the right side. I'm not even sure where to start when it comes to helping Average Joe understand how frightening this really is. I mean, most people will probably understand the point that singling out supporters of certain politicians (e.g. Ron Paul) is anathema to a democratic republic, but they may make an "exception" if they take the contents of the memo at face value. After all, many Ron Paul supporters really are concerned by every single one of the issues brought up in the memo, and every single one of us is probably concerned about at least some of them...plus, it would be easy to find out-of-context quotes on these very forums demonstrating an "anti-cop" attitude (including this very post).

In other words, if this really is a calculated move in an agenda against us (rather than just a misunderstanding), it will be easy for authoritarians to leverage the numerous half-truths involved to make the entirety of the memo look valid and acceptable in the eyes of Average Joe...and I see no easy way to counter this. Any PR experts here?

*As well as the growing epidemic of falsified reports and perjury by cops with an invincibility complex, combined with the endless plague of "cops protecting cops"

EDIT: Ah, here, another shooting!

 

[donnay]

Getting agitated and froggy about it will inevitably play into their hands, justifying their laughable "profile" of RP supporters/constitutionalists as being dangerous wackos.

Be aware, yes. Be concerned, yes. But don't let this bait you into a fight you can't win.

Just saying.

I don't think I am understanding you. So, let me see if I have this right; your advice is to play dead and act like this is not something to be concerned about?

Are you one of those people who thinks you cannot fight city hall?

 

[pcosmar]

In response to a lame post by someone that had not read the multiple Confirmations.

+1!

And then this.

Beware of new members with sudden interest, forum shifters, just sayin'.

Yup, trolls have been outed and banned.

 

[Sandra]

In response to a lame post by someone that had not read the multiple Confirmations.



And then this.


Yup, trolls have been outed and banned.

The crap you post amazes me. Trolls are still on this thread. Join merge, divert.

 

[Sandra]

I don't think I am understanding you. So, let me see if I have this right; your advice is to play dead and act like this is not something to be concerned about?

Are you one of those people who thinks you cannot fight city hall?

Why did you take it THAT way?

 

[pcosmar]

I don't think I am understanding you. So, let me see if I have this right; your advice is to play dead and act like this is not something to be concerned about?

Are you one of those people who thinks you cannot fight city hall?

I would say no. But don't go off half cocked.
This may be an attempt to provoke a response so that they can respond with force.
Don't fall into that trap.

Be aware and be careful, This has gone viral, lets see if the media picks it up.

 

[Mini-Me]

same feelings but this is even scarier

from a law enforcement forum one of the members here posted the question there



another officer calmly says



link
http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=115613

In response to the second quote:

To the OP. What you reference is a non-classified document published by the Missouri Highway Patrol. You can read it as well as I can. If you feel threatened, I respectfully submit, that's your problem.

I hope I'm just taking it the wrong way, because I'm really not liking his attitude. It's like he's some bully saying he has no issue treating/mistreating you with prejudice...and if you feel threatened, that's your problem, not his. Excuse me, but what would it take to make respecting our rights your problem, Mr. Officer? It's pretty telling that he doesn't seem to give a damn about you or your rights...despite the fact that the sole purpose of his job is supposed to be to protect and serve you and your rights.

 

[pcosmar]

The crap you post amazes me. Trolls are still on this thread. Join merge, divert.

So what was the "+1 " to the lame misleading post for then?

Troll hunters are still here too.

 

[pcosmar]

In response to the second quote:

I hope I'm just taking it the wrong way, because I'm really not liking his attitude. It's like he's some bully saying he has no issue treating/mistreating you with prejudice...and if you feel threatened, that's your problem, not his. Excuse me, but what would it take to make respecting our rights your problem, Mr. Officer? It's pretty telling that he doesn't seem to give a damn about you or your rights...despite the fact that the sole purpose of his job is to protect and serve you and your rights.

I don't think you misread anything.

I looked around that sit more a minute. I came away with a bad feeling.

 

[Sandra]

So what was the "+1 " to the lame misleading post for then?

Troll hunters are still here too.

You're attempting to frame all disagreement, even slight, as "trollish". I mean you are AGGRESSIVE with it.