LibertyEagle
Paleoconservative
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 52,730
Drudge?
I think it needs a write-up accompanying it. Otherwise, so dumbasses might just agree with it.
Drudge?
I think it needs a write-up accompanying it. Otherwise, so dumbasses might just agree with it.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=183386&page=3
At the bottom of the page Original_Intent points out that they specifically DO NOT call us terrorists, but rather associated with the militia movement. I think thats important...
anyone remember the anti-militia propaganda smear after Oklahoma City?
In their eyes, militia = terrorists.
Originally Posted by Dripping Rain View Post
but the report doesnt exactly call RP supporters terrorists
it just says that militia are more likely to be associated with him and Chuck and Barr
didnt even call militia terrorists. But it kinda insinnuates they are terrorists. kind of tricky
That's true. AJ's title on the article is quite misleading.
However, it does use the words "extremists" and "fanatics" quite a bit though.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=183386&page=3
At the bottom of the page Original_Intent points out that they specifically DO NOT call us terrorists, but rather associated with the militia movement. I think thats important...
WTF! I wonder how many RP supporters on this forum are actually affiliated to a Militia? I havent seen any.
Language is important right now. Don't get carried away and queer our game. We as supporters of a sitting Republican congressman and former Republican presidential candidate are being singled out as likely militia members who should be watched for fear we commit domestic terror. This is bad enough, it involves all Republicans in our cause, and it's undeniable.
Can somebody explain why the pictures don't align properly within the document on the scans?
anyone remember the anti-militia propaganda smear after Oklahoma City?
In their eyes, militia = terrorists.