Missouri Police Report: RP supporters, Libertarians, anti-NWO movement are TERRORISTS

[LibertyEagle]

I remember, Doktor.

 

[pcosmar]

I''ll await confirmation via announcement from CFL. I don't know anyone on this forum well enough to trust their word especially in the light that we've been duped in the past. It would be foolish to trust anyone you just know online, not to mention that one of those numbers returns results only related to the memo.

Re post from earlier.

Oh, it's real, it's just for Cattle Theft Force.

Those cows are leery of Baldwin supporters, alright.

Oh come on. Get real.
That was a Google search on the Phone No, It verifies that it is a real Phone No.
http://www.dps.mo.gov/homelandsecurity/SuspiciousActivities.htm

3. Or the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC)

o Call (866) 362-6422
o Submit Terrorism Tip http://www.miacx.com/html/MIACSubmitIntel.htm

Is it so hard for people to read?

CALL YOURSELF

 

[hillertexas]

have you been up there lately? i promise you do not want to stay in NSTL or sauget, or anywhere near that side of the river... the only hotels in this area get most of their business from the "rent by the hour" crowd if you know what I mean

If instead of driving 5 minutes into IL, you drive 15, you will find Fairview Heights/Belleville. There are lots of hotels there. It is a safe area...not like East St. Louis or Sauget.

 

[paulitics]

By the way, to those of you younguns out there, THIS is nothing new. You saw the scans of the pamphlets I posted from 9 years ago, right?

Well this is old hat for me, and for the rest of you old farts and geezers.

Shortly after 0911, the same crowd that plagued us during the 90s, trying to label us all terrorists, were tugging on the federal coattails and pointing at anything conservative or "right", trying to use the federal gov as their weapon.

Here is a link for more background on this. The antics of the SPLC and ADL go way back.

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Flag-...onstitutionally-minded+citizens...-a081414253

Grigg has it down right with a revamp of the concept and further history.
http://www.rightsourceonline.com/welch/pastnews_c.cfm?rank=3744


However I have the original JBS article from 2001 saved in my evidence folder and can put the text in here if needed when I return to the Jeep cave.


So there is nothing here that I didn't expect. Many of you might be too young to recall how they tried to blame OKC on "right wing radio". This is laughable considering what a disapating shill Rush Limbaugh is.

What is going on here is this: each state wants DHS funding. To do that, they must pander to the feds. The feds are run by the same people who would consider a Christian with a gun a terrorist but never noticed how ELF and other eco nazis would openly pass around instructions on how to burn down dealerships and labs.

When I say "nothing new" I mean it. Since BOTH SIDES of the political spectrum are all about using the power of the state as their weapon against people they don't like, the table is turning. This is why I spent 8 years losing friends as I tried to warn them that the powers they gleefully gave Bush will be used against them later. I got accused of being a leftist, unpatriotic, etc. I never had friends in the other camp.

So in 2000, the "right" took the One Ring and put it on, thinking they could do good, but through them, as a metaphor for the power of the state, it did evil and lots of it. Now the "left" has the One Ring, and rather than destroy it, they put it on, and the process continues. No matter who the target is, or the reason, the results are the same: more evil (in reality it's more government which can be the same thing).

Paulians, Reganites (the few that are left), the true libertarians - all having a value for the original concept of liberty - are the most dangerous. They have the ability to take that ring to Mt Doom and destroy it. To us, to me, this election was like watching "Alien vs. Predator".

I have to give the democrats some credit however. You know at least what you get with that crowd. It was Bush who tripled the size of the ATF and installed most of the police state apparatus we have today. The concept started way back, of course. But that's the difference. Obama is anti-liberty as much as Bush was, Clinton was, Bush 1, etc.

At least now I don't have to lose friends when I try to warn people.

Good post. I agree with everything you say, especially the last bit.

 

[zach]

Almost 14,000 views!

wow.

 

[UtahApocalypse]

This sure has brought out the trolls:

Instead of jumping onto this thing with a home grown conclusion, why don't we give it A FEW HOURS MORE to be investigated by those IN MISSOURI. They are physically there and will make eye contact with those reportedly responsible. Knee jerk reactions on this thread are highly irresponsible until you get real FACTS! I'm so tired of all the people on here that get riled up over anything and it's the SAME DAMNED PEOPLE in EVERY THREAD!!!!!

Also, Google this memo. Almost every blog that C&P'd the memo references RPF as the source of validation! Now, what if atctulsa's account is wrong or even inaccurate? Investigation is a serious process! So far all we know is thet Hull "heard of the memo" but from where? Did he support or help craft it? No answer so far. INVESTIGATE!!!!!!!!!!!!

I''ll await confirmation via announcement from CFL. I don't know anyone on this forum well enough to trust their word especially in the light that we've been duped in the past. It would be foolish to trust anyone you just know online, not to mention that one of those numbers returns results only related to the memo.

Call them yourself at this point!!! seriously you now have completely shown yourself to be a) Troll B) Incompetent C) Working to try and disinfo this intel for some purpose. The only person I have for someone like you is the iggy bun. Good bye.

 

[A. Havnes]

This sure has brought out the trolls:





Call them yourself at this point!!! seriously you now have completely shown yourself to be a) Troll B) Incompetent C) Working to try and disinfo this intel for some purpose. The only person I have for someone like you is the iggy bun. Good bye.

They could just be in denial.

 

[acptulsa]

They could just be in denial.

I'd kind of like to go there myself about now. Got directions? Any spare blue pills?

 

[UtahApocalypse]

They could just be in denial.

I place that under option B

I'd kind of like to go there myself about now. Got directions? Any spare blue pills?

Sometimes I wish I still was a sheep

 

[pcosmar]

I'd kind of like to go there myself about now. Got directions? Any spare blue pills?

Nope, you have to go full blown traitor to get plugged back into the Matrix after the Red Pill.

I suspect that some just don't want to face the implications that this is true.

Remember that Neo puked when faced with reality.

 

[ConvertedRepublican]

Holy crap.
Once again those in control want to silence the opposition with fear, or have the movement go underground so the government has an excuse to go after it with survellance.
"May you live in INTERESTING times"
old Chinese curse.

Who cursed me?

 

[Sandra]

Pcosmar, you have consistantly attacked all who have ANY doubt as to the bandwagon du jour you choose to jump on. Remember the Granny's got bug out land for sale? You defended them to the HILT!!!

But when a poster that investigated the deal told you it really seemed like a scam, and the Linda herself pretty much well blew her scam wide open, you backed off, backpedaled, then disappeared. But you had big big words then too. As a matter of fact, historically, you have backed every bad idea on the forum, and bashed all good.

 

[constituent]

Go over to Hannity forums. There are far more posts over there about armed revolution than I've ever seen over here. Glenn Beck talks about it regularly, and now other media pundits.

That's no accident. Neither is the sudden marketing slam brought to us by their proud followers. In fact, the two most assuredly go hand-in-hand.

 

[pinkmandy]

Pcosmar, you have consistantly attacked all who have ANY doubt as to the bandwagon du jour you choose to jump on. Remember the Granny's got bug out land for sale? You defended them to the HILT!!!

But when a poster that investigated the deal told you it really seemed like a scam, and the Linda herself pretty much well blew her scam wide open, you backed off, backpedaled, then disappeared. But you had big big words then too. As a matter of fact, historically, you have backed every bad idea on the forum, and bashed all good.

Look, if you don't trust the people here who have called then call yourself. What's so hard about that? Sandra, you are seriously looking like a troll. You're on this thread criticizing people/questioning their credibility while you yourself have done no legwork. Call the number yourself. Look it up yourself to ensure it's a 'real' number. Talk to somebody yourself. How hard is that?

 

[Sandra]

Look, if you don't trust the people here who have called then call yourself. What's so hard about that? Sandra, you are seriously looking like a troll. You're on this thread criticizing people/questioning their credibility while you yourself have done no legwork. Call the number yourself. Look it up yourself to ensure it's a 'real' number. Talk to somebody yourself. How hard is that?

I was talking directly to pcosmar, not you. Nice of you to jump in.

 

[pcosmar]

Pcosmar, you have consistantly attacked all who have ANY doubt as to the bandwagon du jour you choose to jump on. Remember the Granny's got bug out land for sale? You defended them to the HILT!!!

But when a poster that investigated the deal told you it really seemed like a scam, and the Linda herself pretty much well blew her scam wide open, you backed off, backpedaled, then disappeared. But you had big big words then too. As a matter of fact, historically, you have backed every bad idea on the forum, and bashed all good.

No I did not.
I defended the idea of having a place outside of cities. I also stated that I had no idea whether it was a good deal or not.
I did question your negativity and venom toward them.

You jump in and put down any that question the Statis Quo.
Yes I have followed many of your posts and question your motives.

 

[Sandra]

Look, if you don't trust the people here who have called then call yourself. What's so hard about that? Sandra, you are seriously looking like a troll. You're on this thread criticizing people/questioning their credibility while you yourself have done no legwork. Call the number yourself. Look it up yourself to ensure it's a 'real' number. Talk to somebody yourself. How hard is that?

Now this is for you. How can you NOT support a little MORE investigation?

 

[Sandra]

No I did not.
I defended the idea of having a place outside of cities. I also stated that I had no idea whether it was a good deal or not.
I did question your negativity and venom toward them.

You jump in and put down any that question the Statis Quo.
Yes I have followed many of your posts and question your motives.

You're lying. But thank you for exposing yourself.

 

[fedup100]

Actually, I think you are confusing leftist-anarchists with as Murray Rothbard coined the term, "anarcho-capitalists". They are very different.

The powers that be do not care if there is a difference. The use of the word is all they need to play word games and discredit, which is their only goal. People that use that word on these forums have seeded it with the words a tyrannical government needs to vilify.

 

[constituent]

The antics of the SPLC and ADL go way back.

yes indeedee. however, i don't see their hand in this, necessarily. they've been calling all "right-wing" groups "racists" and "terrists" for a long little while now.

what's curious is what may or may not have sparked the drafting of the document, right now no less.