Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart amid child sex storm



you can tell the above was 'clipped' at the end...

this is the presser off Milo channel



I would start at about 21:00 to see what was clipped.
 
Last edited:
The videos that contain the remarks Milo made. Didn't feel like searching for videos without editorializing in the titles; I'll editorialize myself a bit and say Milo is describing pederasty rather than pedophilia:



 
Last edited:
I'm sure it comes as no shock to anyone here that the MSM are completely misrepresenting what Milo said. Both videos have been online for over a year without a problem until now.

#FakeNews

Saw a segment about this on CNN with Erin Burnett today. They have no shame. The mainstream media is dedicated to only one thing, damaging and destroying Trump and essentially anyone but the globalist left.

They played the most controversial audio from Milo, which he had disavowed, then tried to pin that and everything else ever said by Milo on the American Conservative Union and CPAC. They concluded by connecting Milo to Breitbart to Brannon, with an innuendo-filled statement that Brannon now runs the Whitehouse. The impartial media.
 
Feminism teaches girls that waiting until they are in their 30s to get married, if at all, and fucking around in the bedroom in their 20s and focusing on their career is liberating - Milo tells girls the truth, this will likely lead to unhappiness, and that they should get married to a good stable man and have kids when they are young and attractive -- What is sooo horrible about that?? ...

Interesting. I have never listened to Milo, so I know very little of what he has said. Exposing the lie told to two generations of Americans is worthwhile. Attractive or not, telling everyone, especially women, to wait until they are in their 30s to think about marriage and children served the same purpose as birth-control and abortion. They wanted less people.
 
Its extremely pathetic that child abuse victims in this country can't speak openly and honestly about their experiences and opinions.

Shame on anybody for thinking this is making any progress at all.

Political hit job is obvious. Evan McMullin is part of it, look it up.
 
What he said is not a problem for you?

Well I can understand how people who might be against promiscuity might have a problem with what he said, the real issue is that the media is lying and saying that he thinks pedophilia is ok.. He clarified that when he meant younger boys, we are talking mid to late teens or older, and he thinks that the age of consent in most places, 16 or 18, is about right. But even then, it's still a complicated issue.. 15 and 20 vs. 15 and 40 is clearly not the same thing.
 
Last edited:
Its extremely pathetic that child abuse victims in this country can't speak openly and honestly about their experiences and opinions.

Ya it's sorta interesting, Milo is not into younger boys, he is into older men. I have a gay friend who is into older men (he is now 50 and still dates older men..) and he has told me the same thing.. when he was 14 or 15, he was the sexual predator, out trying to get older men.. That is exactly what Milo said on the Rogan podcast.
 
It was certainly controversial but no more than the other topics he talks about. It's so weird because that podcast seems like such a long time ago. I remember listening to it.
 
Its extremely pathetic that child abuse victims in this country can't speak openly and honestly about their experiences and opinions.

Shame on anybody for thinking this is making any progress at all.

Political hit job is obvious. Evan McMullin is part of it, look it up.

He can't speak openly just because CPAC decided to dis-invite him to the conference? or that his publisher a private firm decided they no longer wanted to associate with him? what happened to freedom of association? As for breitbart, he quit the gig because he wrongfully believed that his association would impede whatever it is they are doing over there.

And there is a little progress here, a private company did what they wanted to do regardless of the victim status of the target. I hate to live in a world where private companies are afraid to act because the target has a child sexual abuse card up their butt. Ignore your personal bias and see that what just happened is a small win for freedom.
 
But I have to say I thought he was tougher than this. He seems to be just caving.

Me too. then I realized....

...this is gonna backfire big time on the dems. I see it clearly now. I will not even say how. But lets just say now both black people and homosexual men will not be as reliable in 2018 and 2020 for the democrats.
 
Me too. then I realized....

...this is gonna backfire big time on the dems. I see it clearly now. I will not even say how. But lets just say now both black people and homosexual men will not be as reliable in 2018 and 2020 for the democrats.

And this is good because.....?
 
Me too. then I realized....

...this is gonna backfire big time on the dems. I see it clearly now. I will not even say how. But lets just say now both black people and homosexual men will not be as reliable in 2018 and 2020 for the democrats.

Yea, you know the same way dems attacking Clarence Thomas totally took the black vote away from them. Do you really think gay people and blacks will rally for Milo because he is gay and supposedly has a black lover? This is not how it works, identity politics has its limits and people like Milo are far beyond that limit.

Keep dreaming if you think what is unfolding would hurt the dems with those two demographics.
 
He can't speak openly just because CPAC decided to dis-invite him to the conference? or that his publisher a private firm decided they no longer wanted to associate with him? what happened to freedom of association? As for breitbart, he quit the gig because he wrongfully believed that his association would impede whatever it is they are doing over there.

And there is a little progress here, a private company did what they wanted to do regardless of the victim status of the target. I hate to live in a world where private companies are afraid to act because the target has a child sexual abuse card up their butt. Ignore your personal bias and see that what just happened is a small win for freedom.

Uh no, he can't speak openly (in the Rogan podcast) without being destroyed and accused of defending pedophilia.


How about you ignore your personal bias for a second and see that an actual victim of child abuse had his words twisted to seemingly make him look like a predator?

What happened isn't a small win for freedom, it was an obvious media assassination. Liberal media was salivating over the fact someone combed his past and edited a clip like that together for them to attack.

You're literally advocating for more PC culture by celebrating this.
 
Last edited:
CPAC could be potentially lampooned by Milo in the not-too-far distant future. The majority of main stage speakers there are establishment Republicans who are inherently anti-free speech. I don't think Milo's career will miss a beat going forward, and will continue to escalate in stature.
 
Yea, you know the same way dems attacking Clarence Thomas totally took the black vote away from them. Do you really think gay people and blacks will rally for Milo because he is gay and supposedly has a black lover?

Im not playing 20 questions with you. I told you I will not even say how. I'm not even giving anymore hints as to how this works. Just watch. I'll be right.

This is not how it works, identity politics has its limits and people like Milo are far beyond that limit.

Duh.

Keep dreaming if you think what is unfolding would hurt the dems with those two demographics.

Quit trying to tell me how I think. It is well beyond your feeble mind to even be able to grasp how I think.




Anyways, the more I think about it, the more it all makes sense. Kind of like the worthless NSA position.
 
Am I the only one that sees the hypocrisy in the glee of the msm pointing out alleged pedophilia and sexual misconsuct in order to do their best to ruin Milo, while simultaneously continuing to ignore another looming story about alleged pedophilia and sexual misconduct?

Suddenly this is a very important issue that needs a lot of media attention because their are innocent children out there. Protecting children is important now.

Business as usual.
 
Am I the only one that sees the hypocrisy in the glee of the msm pointing out alleged pedophilia and sexual misconsuct in order to do their best to ruin Milo, while simultaneously continuing to ignore another looming story about alleged pedophilia and sexual misconduct?

Suddenly this is a very important issue that needs a lot of media attention because their are innocent children out there. Protecting children is important now.

Business as usual.

It is projection, but projection is to be expected. Milo was not blindsided.


Fact of the matter is Bannon is two steps ahead of the media. I finally put another piece of the puzzle together tonight. Bannon and Trump have some very sensitive information, and have had it for a while. that is why rump was able to "predict the future" about Weiner. Killing Breitbart was a war they did not expect. And Trump has that old jew connection. And they helped someone out... ...to disappear in the good way, not grave way. The problem with compartmentalization is sometimes everyone can assume it was the other guy, but since it is need to know, it is hush hush and just assumed they other guy lay the hit. So you put the word out, and your guy disappears. But he had the goods. Oh, he had the goods alright.
 
Wait, so you mean the flamboyant jewish gay shit-stirrer "conservative" with the fake name is a false flag? The hell you say!
 
Back
Top