Militia = Legal & Prudent, Why Hide?

[STRATIOTES]

I have tried the well regulated militia concept for the last 20 years, in my opinion the concept is a dead letter.

Nothing more than a name change but sometimes it works.

I use the name FREEDOM FORCE now and explain what it is and what it is not, why it is necessary and how to use it.

Mumbai terror attacks are the wave of the future, in these kinds of trained coordinated active shooter assaults, a hostage is lost every second, one minute goes by and 60 people are dead, the active shooter have no plan of escape and do not expect to survive, the worlds best SWAT team is useless in these kinds of incidents.

The only way to deal with them is the same way Israel and the Philippines did arm the people in the danger areas, includes schools and religious retreats.

Criminal governments fear armed people a lot more than they do terrorists, terrorists are necessary for the criminal state to consolidate power, the people with arms takes away power from the state.

Arms are only one part of the combat triad, skills are a part and fighting mindset are a part, you must have all three legs of equal lengths of the combat triad to prosper in the conflict arena.

Thats why we teach the combat triad at the Freedom Force training center with the basic idea being to create instructor cadres that go forth and multiply.

 

[STRATIOTES]

If I saw some soldiers hanging around, I would ask them if they are willing to die for the plutocrats.

You do not have to ask them, their actions speak volumes, they are part of a standing armed services force meant to dominate anybody the plutocrat wants dominated.

Rep. Elbridge Gerry,
What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. ...Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.

An instance within the memory of some of this house will show us how our militia may be destroyed. Forty years ago, when the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliment was advised by an artful man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that is was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually, by totally disusing and neglecting the militia. -- George Mason at the Virginia Ratification Convention, June 14, 1788


The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [ when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call. -- Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper No. 28

The right of the people to keep and bear arms has been recognized by the General Government; but the best security of that right after all is, the military spirit, that taste for martial exercises, which has always distinguished the free citizens of these States...Such men form the best barrier to the liberties of America. -- Gazette of the United States, October 14, 1789.

An armed and trained militia is the firmest bulwark of republics -- that without standing armies their liberty can never be in danger, nor with large ones safe... -- James Madison ( First Inaugural Address, Saturday, March 4, 1809.)

Framer quote
Under every government the [last] resort of the people, is an appeal to the sword; whether to defend themselves against the open attacks of a foreign enemy, or to check the insidious encroachments of domestic foes. Whenever a people ... entrust the defence of their country to a regular, standing army, composed of mercenaries, the power of that country will remain under the direction of the most wealthy citizens.

"The militia, who are in fact the effective part of the people at large, will render many troops quite unnecessary. They will form a powerful check upon the regular troops, and will generally be sufficient to over-awe them" –
Tench Coxe, An American Citizen IV, October 21, 1787

Armed services in small numbers are necessary but the giant force that exists today only does so because of the monopoly of power the state has accumulated by bloody violence.

The service person is nothing more than a slave that must murder to protect his master.

 

[STRATIOTES]

Best quote

Government: If you refuse to pay unjust taxes, your property will be confiscated. If you attempt to defend your property, you will be arrested. If you resist arrest, you will be clubbed. If you defend yourself against clubbing, you will be shot dead. These procedures are known as the Rule of Law. -- Edward Abbey

 

[Kalifornia]

Best quote

Government: If you refuse to pay unjust taxes, your property will be confiscated. If you attempt to defend your property, you will be arrested. If you resist arrest, you will be clubbed. If you defend yourself against clubbing, you will be shot dead. These procedures are known as the Rule of Law. -- Edward Abbey

"Government. We know whats best for you, and we'll kill you to prove it."

 

[cheapseats]

A group of people that meet, and train, can be considered "organized", but without the trust, and backing, of the general population, they will be easy targets for smear jobs that affect the entire liberty movement.

Exactly so.

I am suggesting that 2009 is precisely the time for an Armed Militia to win the trust, support and participation of the general population -- AYSO soccer meets Appleseed, type of an attitude.

So far, the reason we "can't" play the conspicuous militia angle is because we're doing the clandestine militia thing. A third party candidate can't be president because we've ALWAYS elected our presidents from the two main parties -- it's the same kind of frustrating circularity, Catch 22.

The tables must be turned. Nuthin' switches a psyche from defense to offense like Might Makes Right -- what is true for the person is true for the population.

 

[cheapseats]

Best quote

Government: If you refuse to pay unjust taxes, your property will be confiscated. If you attempt to defend your property, you will be arrested. If you resist arrest, you will be clubbed. If you defend yourself against clubbing, you will be shot dead. These procedures are known as the Rule of Law. -- Edward Abbey

In a nutshell, Might Makes Right.

The People are AFRAID. I don't blame them. I'm afraid, too. The Armed Americans who are NOT tyrannical and who are NOT profiteers and who are NOT traitors need to make friends with the unarmed scaredy cat suburbanites.

In a nutshell, Numbers Make Might.

 

[cheapseats]

Nothing more than a name change but sometimes it works.

I use the name FREEDOM FORCE now and explain what it is and what it is not, why it is necessary and how to use it.

Force and right are the governors of the world; force till right is ready.
--Matthew Arnold

Force is the prerequisite of movement and the midwife of progress.
--Charles de Gaulle

Force is the midwife of every old society pregnant with a new one.
--Karl Marx

Do you know, Fontanes, what amazes me most in the world? The inability of force to maintain anything at all. There are only two powers in the world: the sword and the mind. In the long run, the sword is always defeated by the mind.
--Napoleon

I was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion. They only can force me who obey a higher law than I.
--Henry David Thoreau

I will argue that crass commercialization of weaponry and self-defense -- crass, meaning the Madison Avenue advertising blitz/this year's pet rock variety -- is in order both economically and patriotically. A win-win.

Call their bluff. Meet them in the marketplace of ideas. The glossy packaging of Terror has inspired profits aplenty and, in a capitalist society, this naturally produces competition. I give you the Self Defense Industry.

The wallet remains the most persuasive of votes.

 

[cheapseats]

Picture a poster of American 13-year-olds . . . one in a tutu, one with a violin, one with a soccer ball and one with a baseball bat . . . squaring off against four mini-mullahs with the AK-47's they have been wielding since they were in single digits. First of all, they won't be squaring off. The tutu, the violin and the soccer ball will be hiding behind the baseball bat.

Now imagine the caption,

CAN YOUR CHILDREN DEFEND THEMSELVES?

Picture two freshly scrubbed teens on a date, and an attempted carjacking at a traffic light that is thwarted when the nonplussed couple draw arms against the gang of hoodlums. CAR METAL IS INADEQUATE PROTECTION IN TIMES OF TERROR.

All those commercials where the frightened Mommy or frightened teen is reassured by and the Breaker And Enterer is scared off by an ALARM and a PHONE CALL. Maybe, maybe not. I figger the Breaker And Enterer knows he's got a window of opportunity before the cavalry arrives. How much more effective to see a determined mother or teen grab their gun, THEN the phone. THAT will send the perpetrator high tailing it.

Let's hear the Mommy answer the security company call by saying, "Yep, it's the real deal, a burglar. I've got him pinned down til you get here."

 

[cheapseats]

The federal and any number of the state governments are OUT. OF. CONTROL. Congress is run COMPLETELY. AMOK.

No matter, they don't even call for a TIME OUT. They don't even PAUSE, though it is clear they are compounding mistakes more quickly than interest.

Why?

Why, given all the evidence of misguided judgement and erroneous analysis, do not the Powers That Be simply STOP for a minute? Let everyone catch their breath and survey the damage?

Because if we would take the time to let the dust settle, we could SEE who is at fault and who needs to get the boot and what needs to be done and how to do it. The Powers That Be would lose their power. So they don't just keep the havoc swirling, they ADD to it. Daily.

How can they do that?

Because they are completely, totally, and utterly unafraid of the American People.

 

[cheapseats]

I believe the overwhelming support for RP above all the other candidates speaks volumes...



Well, I get around and do not find this strange at all. Notably in a time when our forces are stretched and recruitment is a priority.



IMHO- Your emphasizing of what you see as "highly unusual", (and others consider kinda normal) seems an over-reaction. Couple that with your, "Go after them for a discreet photo" and I see you considering them a threat, hence an enemy

...



yes, an unorganized militia of everyday armed citizens would do a much better job at "keeping the peace", in general, and is one of the requirements for the existence of an organized militia, which has separate benefits.

Which brings us back to the topic of this thread, "Militia = Legal & Prudent, Why Hide?"

I have been meaning to come back to this, in case I offended anyone . . . I mean separately from my characteristically abrasive style.

If I gave the impression that I don't think there are people on this board who have Experience, I didn't mean to. It is the young 'uns who stubbornly spout theory despite assurances from experienced voices that Reality trumps theory who lack Experience.

As I see it, there are several distinct groups of posters on this board.

1. Regular Libertarians
2. Redneck Libertarians
3. die-hard Ron Paul Libertarians
4. political aspirants
5. disillusioned current and former Military


The Miltary Folk have Experience that I won't have, no matter how long I live. And many of them have seen more of the world than I. But they are folk of few words, I think. People with life-and-death experience know better than anyone that Talk Is Cheap.

I realize that.

I realize that I have no idea what bad really is, if it gets really bad.

But I am arguing that things ARE really bad, differently, and that while we cannot and do not ADVOCATE violence, we also cannot in good conscience continue to do NOTHING about one grave wrong because we fear that another gravity will attend the correction.

 

[cheapseats]

As I see it, there are several distinct groups of posters on this board.

1. Regular Libertarians
2. Redneck Libertarians
3. die-hard Ron Paul Libertarians
4. political aspirants
5. disillusioned current and former Military

There are others, as well. Despite our love affair with labels, few people fit snugly into the categories into which we find it emotionally convenient to stuff them. All evidence that our labeling and filing system creates confusion rather than eliminates clutter constitutes fact not supporting the theory. Disss-MISSED.

Not that I have always voted along party line, but I have been a registered Republican since I was old enough to vote. Why? Same reason that I'm technically still Catholic, even though I haven't darkened a church door since appointment of a former Nazi as Pope and his continued refusal to take an unambiguous and punitive line on child molestation. My father was a Republican. My father was Catholic.

This is the basis for PART of my distinct and mounting distrust of Barack Hussein Obama.

In my increasingly Libertarian view, there is a certain je ne sais quoi (I don't know what) and a certain joie de vivre (joy of living) that attends the laissez faire (let affairs take their course without interfering) aspect of Libertarianism. The Libertarians may disagree on this or that (I maintain that "anti-abortion" is antithetical to Libertarianism and that privatized infrastructure is BEGGING for trouble), but they are SURELY clear that they are on the same side.

Ditto, the Republicans . . . though I'm waiting to hear whether Klan-grade racists will pose a threat to me over my advocacy of as-complete-as-possible non-discrimination.

Because I typically roll alone, and because I am a MOTOR MOUTH who has been cooped up for hours on end flitting between a laptop and multiple news channels, I get into lots and lots of conversations when I'm out and about. I am here to report that there are PLENTY of Democrats and PLENTY of Blacks who know that there is capital-B Bullshit afoot in Washington.

Since I have no life experience with this, it is all hypothetical. But in standing the issue to Reason, it seems to me that an effective Resistance wants organization and command. There is a point at which SOMEONE must say 'On your mark, get set, GO.' Otherwise, unless a People means to simply appease and accommodate, the People leave their 'D-Day' to happenstance.

 

[Doktor_Jeep]

I don't have an answer for whether to hide or not, but these facts somehow feel connected to what that answer could be.....



First look at this bill introduced on the 6th.
HR 45 Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45


Look at the sponsor:
Rep. Bobby Rush [D-IL]


Now looking at the Wikipedia page of the sponsor of this bill:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Rush

You find this:
Rush is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, as well as a former member and founder of the Illinois chapter of the Black Panther Party.

Now remember what they did to the one candidate who spoke about the real role of the Second Amendment?
It was the candidate who said this:

"More importantly, however, the debate about certain types of weapons ignores the fundamental purpose of the Second amendment. The Second amendment is not about hunting deer or keeping a pistol in your nightstand. It is not about protecting oneself against common criminals. It is about preventing tyranny. The Founders knew that unarmed citizens would never be able to overthrow a tyrannical government as they did. They envisioned government as a servant, not a master, of the American people. The muskets they used against the British Army were the assault rifles of the time. It is practical, rather than alarmist, to understand that unarmed citizens cannot be secure in their freedoms. It is convenient for gun banners to dismiss this argument by saying "That could never happen here, this is America"--but history shows that only vigilant people can keep government under control. By banning certain weapons today, we may plant the seeds for tyranny to flourish ten, thirty, or fifty years from now."

That was Ron Paul who said that.

This was the same Ron Paul who was accused of being a racist. Remember that? Remember the donor who was a neo nazi? Remember the newsletter brough out by Dennis Kirchick (Aka, The Blowfish) that Ron Paul did not write?

So let's see, the man who is honest about government and the role of the 2nd Amendment, who everybody know is NOT a racist, does not get to be president and any such bills he sponsors for any kind of liberty tends to be ignored.

But meanwhile A BLACK RACIST from Chicago gets to introduce a gun bill that spells doom for many of us who will become criminals at the stroke of a pen and from that point we can expect a cage or a bloody screaming death.

Think about this. How come we will never see anybody associated with any militia in the Senate or congress working to expand liberty, for guns or not, on anything? No, the Black Panther (connected to a racist criminal organization) gets to do the exact opposite. The man who speaks truth for the intent of 2A gets marginalized, smeared, etc.

Now, let's also consider how the NRA ignored Ron Paul, and how the NRA is being rather silent on this bill right now. Would this be the same NRA that helped pass the Veterans Disarmament act passed in an 11th hour session?
That same bill that I and some friends went to Spokane for and FOUGHT McCain supporters over to make removal thereof a part of the WS GOP platform? Yes, McCain people AGAINST gun rights?


So tell me whether or not this is a criminal state run by criminals looking to disarm you? The same criminals who also want to take your wealth, tell you how to live, possibly send you to die in useless wars, and make a lifelong tax slave of you.

What do you do if some thugs are in your driveway telling you that you should not have any guns after they inform you they are coming in to rob you and rape your kids?


To hide or not, at that point....


at that point, determines where on your property you want to be cleaning up the splattered brains.

 

[cheapseats]

As I see it, there are several distinct groups of posters on this board.

1. Regular Libertarians
2. Redneck Libertarians
3. die-hard Ron Paul Libertarians
4. political aspirants
5. disillusioned current and former Military

Do not misunderestimate the significance of the Political Aspirants.

I have learned a good deal of bad stuff in my two-plus years in the trenches of such national debate as is occurring on the blogosphere. This isn't fun and games for me. This is how I propose to make a living. This is how I propose to slay dragons.

I propose to make a living BY slaying dragons. Slaying Dragons is a metaphor. I'm allowed to say that.

In my world view, Slaying Dragons is a growth industry.

At the board on which I posted prior to this one, I "watched" and "heard" garden variety Democratic Do Gooders become vicious guttersnipes behind their adoration of a man whose every mystery points to No Good. People I have known for YEARS have become irrational, unkind, disrespectful and worse. There is no doubt in my mind, none, that Obamamaniacs would have lined right up with Adolf Hitler.

One kinda sorta knows that humans are capable of atrocity, but now I KNOW that my own countrymen are unreliable.

I often feel that I am wandering around in shock, and that someone will finally attend to me or perhaps, in my distraction, I will get hit by a bus. Los Angeles DOES have one of the highest pedestrian fatality rates in the nation. No matter, while we are long at war and gang mayhem proceeds apace, L.A.P.D. hides in the bushes in order to issue a steady stream of oh-so-lucrative speeding tickets. It is UNREAL.

My whole life is different. My future is unknown. I am hurt. I am frightened. I am confused. I am DISGUSTED. By contrast, there are those who are jockeying to "win" public office. Like, what, we just go along with BLATANT, UNETHICAL AND DANGEROUS BULLSHIT for another 2, 4, 6, 8 years and SLOWLY infiltrate "their" power structure with "our" people who will miraculously not be corrupted or ineffective?

Political Activists are their own Elite. It's what they DO. Some people like to bowl, some like to garden, some like to hunt, some like to shoot hoops. Some like politics. And the ones who like politics would oblige us ALL to be "into" politics, vigilantly and perpetually exercising our rights and responsibilities as citizens. We are PAYING people to handle that shit.

Political Activists and especially Political Aspirants feed this UNGODLY system as surely as the sycophants bleed it dry. Rather than rolling up our sleeves and doing what needs to be done -- so that NON political people can resume bowling and gardening and hunting and shooting hoops -- Political Activists and Aspirants, in a peaceful nod to non-violence, would have the rest of us spend OUR lives with our primary, aggravating, time-consuming hobby being the policing of our politicians via oversight-read-that-volunteerism.

Some people are gettin' paid, and some aren't. Fuck that for a laugh.

 

[cheapseats]

I don't have an answer for whether to hide or not, but these facts somehow feel connected to what that answer could be.....

Whether to hide or not is not my question. My answer is NOT to hide. My answer is to go MORE public and to draw MORE attention and to run the bastards out of Washington. Not because I am violent, but because they fear the violence that could EASILY be incited.

I have a plan, but I cannot execute it alone. Will it work, who knows? Does anyone have a better one? Not that I've read.

Do I proceed to spell it out on an open forum? 'Cuz here's what I'm observing. MSM and Barack Obama and now corporations are all about "bipartisan" send-us-your-great-ideas-for-free. And then, because some people are well-intentioned and because others are satisfied with their name being read on the news, everyone sends in their great ideas. Just like everyone sent in their cash during the campaign. The Entrenched Interests cherry-pick the good ideas, and funnel them to the Entrenched Players, such that it's STILL THE SAME NAMES AND FACES who are gettin' the lion's share of the revenues.

That was the problem in the first place. Too much wealth in too few hands is an unsustainable paradigm.

First look at this bill introduced on the 6th.
HR 45 Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45

Let's be real clear. I am not only wanting but NEEDING to find myself a Partner who can PROTECT me as well as facilitate my plan. I am a SITTING DUCK. I never anticipated having this "problem." You don't have to persuade me about the shenanigans that are being BULLDOZED through, while Americans pussy-foot around with Political Correctness.

The new onslaught of anti-gun legislation should be countered on grounds of National Security, not Gun Rights. Y'all should be playing the Patriot Card, and calling out by name the Turncoats who would disarm the citizenry of a nation at war.

SCARE THE BEJEEZUS out of people. Like they do.

And lean on the gun manufacturers. They can't enjoy your help in the courtrooms, when some grieving family member wants to hold the manufacturer rather than the wielder of a weapon responsible for their loss, and then let you fight your own battles alone. As ever, it's Big Shots lettin' little guys do their dirty work for them.

Look at the sponsor:
Rep. Bobby Rush [D-IL]


Now looking at the Wikipedia page of the sponsor of this bill:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Rush

You find this:
Rush is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, as well as a former member and founder of the Illinois chapter of the Black Panther Party.

I am ON to Bobby Rush.

Color Over Principle

This was the same Ron Paul who was accused of being a racist. Remember that? Remember the donor who was a neo nazi? Remember the newsletter brough out by Dennis Kirchick (Aka, The Blowfish) that Ron Paul did not write?

I do indeed remember that the support of white supremacists unto Klan members was at issue. I don't know who wrote what but, for sure, the hand was not well played.

So let's see, the man who is honest about government and the role of the 2nd Amendment, who everybody know is NOT a racist, does not get to be president and any such bills he sponsors for any kind of liberty tends to be ignored.

But meanwhile A BLACK RACIST from Chicago gets to introduce a gun bill that spells doom for many of us who will become criminals at the stroke of a pen and from that point we can expect a cage or a bloody screaming death.

Everybody did NOT know about Ron Paul and racism, that was part of the problem. The hand was NOT well played. Someone in Ron Paul's inner circle FUCKED UP.

That said, I'll be goddamned if I will have argued against Klan-caliber white supremacists . . . let's face it, scary dudes . . . only to turn around and have All Black All The Time blaring out of the White House just 'cuz my wimpy AND mildly racist countrymen think we're all finally "in" with the homeys. (fist bump here)

Think about this. How come we will never see anybody associated with any militia in the Senate or congress working to expand liberty, for guns or not, on anything?

Because they are skulking around on the defensive? Because they are being roped 'n doped?

No, the Black Panther (connected to a racist criminal organization) gets to do the exact opposite. The man who speaks truth for the intent of 2A gets marginalized, smeared, etc.

Keeping with the clarity angle, I am not a racist. Aside from being morally sound, I believe that as-total-as-possible non-discrimination is ALSO the best business practice and the best self-defense.

Because I am not a racist, I have NO problem calling a spade a spade.

All Black All The Time doesn't work for me. Barack Obama & Gang have an UNMISTAKABLY pro-black agenda, and it's NOT goin' unchallenged on my watch.

Now, let's also consider how the NRA ignored Ron Paul, and how the NRA is being rather silent on this bill right now. Would this be the same NRA that helped pass the Veterans Disarmament act passed in an 11th hour session?
That same bill that I and some friends went to Spokane for and FOUGHT McCain supporters over to make removal thereof a part of the WS GOP platform? Yes, McCain people AGAINST gun rights?

I don't think this hand is being played rightly, either.

So tell me whether or not this is a criminal state run by criminals looking to disarm you? The same criminals who also want to take your wealth, tell you how to live, possibly send you to die in useless wars, and make a lifelong tax slave of you.

It is.

What do you do if some thugs are in your driveway telling you that you should not have any guns after they inform you they are coming in to rob you and rape your kids?


To hide or not, at that point....

Me, presently, I will be killed in that scenario. I don't yet have a gun, you see, nor training in its use.

at that point, determines where on your property you want to be cleaning up the splattered brains.

Brains will be splattered, no doubt. The question is, who's?

But brains are ALREADY being splattered. Every day. Made In America gadgetry often features.

 

[M House]

Sadly, I think the reason militia's get such a bad rap is their image in media portrayal. I mean it tends to always seem like a bunch of off the wall violent rednecks. Seats you wanted to have your documentary. Why don't you document the creation and principle behind say Doktor's proposed militia, Seats? You'll have to be very careful in that's presented maturely, as a their innate right, with as little political polarization as position. Anyway, I'd stay away from presenting it as political movement NRA etc., just something constitutional and long overdue.

 

[M House]

I know putting something out there possibly with personal information would seem terrible. However, if it's presented non-violently, principled, and with constitutional conviction. Say your opponent positions to interfere, it will be seen as the aggressor and other militias may pop up.

 

[M House]

One more thing sad it's a triple post.

Also, the ex-military here are by far the best people to present this. People in enforcement positions have a lot more respect for someone who once in a similar position. Though, even they have been losing this status. How, do you deny the rights of someone who has supposedly defended those rights? Most anti-war vets or political dissenters are seen as unpatriotic. It's a terrible dichotomy, now. I think a documentary could also bring that to light.

 

[cheapseats]

Sadly, I think the reason militia's get such a bad rap is their image in media portrayal.

In a society that over-values youth and beauty, Image Is All. I give you American Idol.

I mean it tends to always seem like a bunch of off the wall violent rednecks.

Yep. The image is tarnished. Needs polishing.

Seats you wanted to have your documentary.

The documentary is THE END. It's what happens on the road that counts, whether it AMOUNTS to a documentary. Or a film, no need to constrain ourselves. Liberty IS the goal.

But yes, I HAVE spied the Appleseed Circuit as an itinerary and a Call To Arms as a theme.

Why don't you document the creation and principle behind say Doktor's proposed militia, Seats? You'll have to be very careful in that's presented maturely, as a their innate right, with as little political polarization as position. Anyway, I'd stay away from presenting it as political movement NRA etc., just something constitutional and long overdue.

National Security meets The Dating Game, it's a Win-Win. Go forth and multiply.

 

[cheapseats]

I know putting something out there possibly with personal information would seem terrible. However, if it's presented non-violently, principled, and with constitutional conviction. Say your opponent positions to interfere, it will be seen as the aggressor and other militias may pop up.

Quite right. I am a walking, articulating Grievance. By being forthright with my case for Citizen Modification in the court of Public Opinion, inasmuch as the whole world knows that the American Legal System is rigged in favor of Moneyed and Powerful Interests, my Goverment will reveal itself as a Global Goliath if it will not grant me the widest conceivable berth to follow my dream.

 

[cheapseats]

I will seek Asylum in my own country.