dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
I never claimed that. I just claimed your theory is not fact-based, and you have yet to provide any.
Larger populations or not, you need SOME data in order to make the claim that these labels have any meaning.
Some data has already been presented by HH, you have yet to specify anything else that you would like to see proven.
I've already pointed you in the direction of where you can find it, I'm not going to re-listen to 15 hours of podcasts.. but I might dig up something specific. There is plenty of irrefutable data that shows that this model is consistent over large populations.
You're really sounding like you are so against it that all the data in the world wouldn't sway your opinion, though.