MI Gov. Whitmer Busted. Stole Election with "Drop and Roll" Mega-Batches All for Her, at Night

[James_Madison_Lives]

MI Gov. Whitmer Busted. Stole Election with "Drop and Roll" Mega-Batches All for Her, at Night

Nearly perfectly vertical lines means these batches of 30,000 or so votes are essentially all for Whitmer. No candidate will get essentially 100% of the vote in any precinct, never mind many of them adding up to the population of a small city. Someone like Trump will get 15% even someplace like the Bronx.

At 3am in particular there is a massive vote dump of Whitmer and only Whitmer votes.

Exactly the same as happened with Biden in 2020 in swing states MI, WI, GA and PA. This is getting predictable.

Charts of vote spikes 2020, but only in swing states MI, WI, GA, PA.

How Drop and Roll works.


MI Gov. Whitmer Busted. Stole Election with "Drop and Roll" Mega-Batches All for Her, in Dead of Night.

 

[Matt4Liberty]

It's not exactly the same as Biden. They did a better job overall of dispersing the ballots. She won counties all over the state. They were also smaller dumps. They are better at it than two years ago. I'd also like to see the totals. I doubt they had more ballots cast for Whitmer in Detroit than the complete population. That was desperation last time. This time they were prepared.

 

[Origanalist]

 

[Matt4Liberty]

I've been seeing this holier than thou attitude becoming more and more common. Yes, this will probably not be resolved at the ballot box. That being said, what does not voting actually achieve? There's no minimum requirement for the amount of votes. When they knock on your door at night to take you to a prison camp, does anyone think that you can say you didn't vote and they'll respond, "Oh sorry sir, we had no idea. We'll just be leaving then."?

 

[acptulsa]

I've been seeing this holier than thou attitude becoming more and more common. Yes, this will probably not be resolved at the ballot box. That being said, what does not voting actually achieve?

I think you're missing the point. People are saying more than voting will have to be done. They aren't saying do less.

 

[TheCount]

I love how the article says that the vote spikes should include at least 15% for Dixon, and they show a chart that has at least that much going to Dixon during the spike.

Don't believe your lying eyes, I guess.

 

[oyarde]

While whitmer is the perfect example of someone who should not win gov again michigan is the perfecr example of a state that would do so. Makes it difficult to know.

 

[Matt4Liberty]

I think you're missing the point. People are saying more than voting will have to be done. They aren't saying do less.

I agree that more needs to be done, but there's plenty that think that "not being part of the system" by not voting achieve anything. Look at all the memes on the meme threads. With that attitude it would like saying we're not going to be better off with Massive Paul, Green, etc... in congress than their opponents.

 

[Krugminator2]

I love how the article says that the vote spikes should include at least 15% for Dixon, and they show a chart that has at least that much going to Dixon during the spike.

Don't believe your lying eyes, I guess.

Whitmer was an overwhelming favorite to be reelected just Biden was an even bigger favorite than Hillary in 2016. Yet when the preferred outcome doesn't happen, it is always cheating. But when Trump wins in a fluke in 2016, that is a fair election. It's insanity.

It is never that an unqualified tv bimbo from a fringe news outlet said a lot of ridiculous things that Democrats were able to run non-stop ads on in a state that usually votes Democrat who was a huge underdog lost because that is what should have happened.

 

[pcosmar]

But when Trump wins in a fluke in 2016, that is a fair election. It's insanity.

Trump Won easily because NO ONE wanted Hillary.

He won in Opposition to the GOP nevertrumpers. Despite them.

and Biden could not fill chairs in small auditoriums, while Trump had Standing room, and Overflowing Crowds wherever he went.. STILL DOES.

 

[TheTexan]

I've been seeing this holier than thou attitude becoming more and more common. Yes, this will probably not be resolved at the ballot box. That being said, what does not voting actually achieve? There's no minimum requirement for the amount of votes. When they knock on your door at night to take you to a prison camp, does anyone think that you can say you didn't vote and they'll respond, "Oh sorry sir, we had no idea. We'll just be leaving then."?

I think you're missing the point. People are saying more than voting will have to be done. They aren't saying do less.

Yes, noone here is saying we shouldn't vote (except the anarchists- don't listen to them)

We should be voting HARDER. Not softer

 

[Occam's Banana]

I agree that more needs to be done, but there's plenty that think that "not being part of the system" by not voting achieve anything. Look at all the memes on the meme threads.

No one is saying that "'not being part of the system' by not voting" will change or achieve anything. By itself, it obviously won't.

But voting won't change or achieve anything, either - and for the same reason: by voting, one is not actually doing anything.

Election outcomes are not the causes of changes or achievements - they are the effects of them (or of their absence).

IOW: Voting is not a catalyst for change. At best, it is like a windsock indicating the direction and degree of change (or the lack of it).

As such, voting can be useful - but not for the purpose so many seem to think or hope it is.

With that attitude it would like saying we're not going to be better off with Massive Paul, Green, etc... in congress than their opponents.

Massie, Paul, Greene, etc. are not coming to save us. They are not going to tame the federal beast, or even constrain or inhibit it significantly. That doesn't mean their presence in Congress isn't valuable. If nothing else, they expose more clearly, and for more to see, that the emperor has no clothes, and they demonstrate more effectively that seeking top-down change is a futile endeavor.

Those are good and needed things, and they should be appreciated as such - but much more than that is required which simply cannot be supplied by voting, or by the outcomes of any elections. At most, voting should be considered as a sidelight, not as a primary locus of action. As a primary locus of action, voting will never consistently be anything but a perennial disappointment.

Regarding what the primary locus(es) of action ought to be, there is no single and definitive answer. Active non-compliance, agorism, agitation & messaging [1], open defiance & resistance (up to and including defensive violence), etc. - all of these and others are or can be appropriate courses of action. And unlike elections, none of them depend on winning a majority (or even a plurality) of votes first before they can begin having any effects [2].

I know that the lack of specificity inherent in this is not as attractive, appealing, or satisfying as other seemingly neat, tidy, and easily-stated "solutions" (such as simply voting for the "right" people or things - whomever or whatever those might be), but such uncertainty is inescapable. The only thing of which we can be sure is that, while it is possible (and perhaps even likely) that we may lose, it is impossible that we must lose.



[1] Where "messaging" is not the same thing as "education" - see my footnote at the bottom of this post.

[2] That's a good thing, too - because at scale, staunch and ideologically-driven pro-liberty folk are unlikely ever to be a majority.

 

[Slave Mentality]

Voting is the desire to inflict your superior positions upon those with inferior positions.

Voting is “the consent of the governed”. Not voting means you don’t consent. I will never consent to the theft of my liberty.

True consent of the governed comes from the end of the barrel. You vote because you refuse to believe this. Why would a free man choose to let anyone lead him? Yes, they will lead the non voter too, but only by the barrel of the gun.

For me spreading thoughts of independence and liberty is not in line with getting in line every couple of years to pick our attackers so we can continue getting poked in the ass by these cretins. Some of us know it’s coming, but sure the hell aren’t pulling our pants down for them.

The Next Most Important Election? Who cares? Both teams are partners. You vote because you refuse to believe that.

 

[acptulsa]

 

[TheCount]

Anytime you get a screenshot with no link, you're being bullshitted.

..