Mexico's lawsuit against Arizona gun dealers can proceed, US judge rules

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
51,888
https://www.reuters.com/world/ameri...ealers-can-proceed-us-judge-rules-2024-03-25/


Mexico's lawsuit against Arizona gun dealers can proceed, US judge rules
By Nate Raymond
March 25, 20247:50 PM CDTUpdated 24 days ago

A sign warns that firearms and ammunition are barred in Mexico
A sign warning drivers that firearms and ammunition are prohibited in Mexico is seen at the U.S.-Mexico border in Nogales, Arizona, United States, October 9, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
March 25 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Monday ruled that the Mexican government could move forward with a lawsuit accusing five Arizona gun dealers of participating in the trafficking of weapons and ammunition to drug cartels across the U.S.-Mexico border.
U.S. District Judge Rosemary Marquez in Tucson rejected, opens new tab arguments that a U.S. law that provides the firearms industry broad protection from lawsuits over their products' misuse precluded Mexico's claims against the gun dealers.

Those dealers - Diamondback Shooting Sports Inc, SnG Tactical LLC, Loan Prairie LLC, Ammo A-Z LLC, and Sprague's Sports Inc - argued the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) shielded them from the lawsuit Mexico filed in 2022.
Marquez said Mexico makes plausible claims that are exempt from PLCAA protection, including that the five companies violated various U.S. firearm-related laws, causing harm to the foreign nation.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report this ad
Mexico alleged that the gun dealers facilitated the trafficking of military-style assault weapons like the AR-15 and ammunition to cartels through reckless and unlawful practices, including firearm sales to straw purchasers who illegally bought them for others.
While the judge allowed much of the lawsuit to move forward, she dismissed several of Mexico's individual legal claims, including that the companies violated U.S. racketeering law and created a public nuisance.

Lawyers for Mexico said they looked forward to proving their case in court, and Mexico's foreign ministry in a statement said it would continue to "defend its interests and those of its citizens through all means at its disposal."
"Today's ruling is a huge step forward in holding the gun industry accountable for its contribution to gun violence, and in stopping the flood of trafficked guns to the cartels," Jonathan Lowy, a lawyer for Mexico with the U.S.-based advocacy group Global Action on Gun Violence, said in a statement.

Defense attorneys did not respond to requests for comment.
Mexico sued the Arizona dealers days after a federal judge in Boston dismissed a $10 billion lawsuit it filed in 2021 seeking to hold several U.S. gun manufacturers responsible for facilitating weapons trafficking across the U.S.-Mexico border.
A U.S. appeals court in January revived that lawsuit against manufacturers including Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI.O), opens new tab, and Sturm, Ruger & Co (RGR.N), opens new tab. The manufacturers are planning to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their appeal.
 
The border is wide open, how are gun makers supposed to control that?

What would the Mexican Marxists say if 1 million armed citizen militiamen showed up with their guns and closed the border?

Rhetorical questions of course, this is nothing but more lawfare.
 
Story but the Mexican claims that cartels are sending people into US gun shops to purchase strictly semi-automatic civilian versions of military style weapons literally reek of bullshit. With their criminal connections cartels could and likely do easily obtain selective fire military versions on the international market, and do so at a better price. Hell, REAL AK 47s, M-16s, and a wide variety of other military arms are ubiquitous and cheap on international markets. There’s no need to buy the civilianized versions from gun dealers.
 
Back
Top