Meet Trump's Cabinet-in-waiting

OK, I'm not sure where you hang outside of RPF, but do you by any chance read the comments section at zerohedge, for example? Lots of highly skeptical alt-right and libertarian types there that are cautiously supporting Trump. I can tell you with absolute certainty that if Trump were to appoint John Bolton, the shit-show that would ensue would be epic.

I have no doubt that a few stalwarts would have fits. So what?

Trump isn't going to give any more of a shit about what Zero Hedge comment posters might think or say than Obama did about what Glenn Greenwald (and his readers) or Code Pink thought or said.

I'm going to say this once more, typing as slowly as I can this time: in the unlikely event that Trump appoints Bolton, the vast majority of Trump supporters either won't say doodly-squat about it or they will make excuses for it. As I've previously pointed out, we already have an example of a Giuliani apologia right here at RPFs, of all places ...
 
Last edited:
I have no doubt that a few stalwarts would have fits. So what?

Trump isn't going to give any more of a $#@! about what Zero Hedge comment posters might think or say than Obama did about what Glenn Greenwald or Code Pink thought or said.

I'm going to say this once more, typing as slowly as I can this time: in the event Trump appointed Bolton, the vast majority of Trump supporters either won't say jack $#@! or they will make excuses for why it's not such a bad thing after all.

MAGA is dead if he picks Bolton as SoS. It's that simple. There can be no rationalization.
 
the vast majority of Trump supporters either won't say doodly-squat about it or they will make excuses for why it's not such a bad thing after all.

RPF trumpies are under the impression that the vast majority of trump voters are alt-right. Alt-right is the smallest fringe of trump support. He owes them nothing and it's unlikely he will acknowledge them in any capacity. His accidental alt-right retweets were quickly rescinded when his campaign recognized the mistakes.

He'd be correct to continue to ignore them. Considering the way the Ron Paul movement has diffused into a disintegrated vapor, imagine what the alt-right is going to be like in 5-10 years.

The vast majority of his voters wouldn't know Bolton from Jeff Tucker.
 
RPF trumpies are under the impression that the vast majority of trump voters are alt-right. Alt-right is the smallest fringe of trump support. He owes them nothing and it's unlikely he will acknowledge them in any capacity. His accidental alt-right retweets were quickly rescinded when his campaign recognized the mistakes.

He'd be correct to continue to ignore them. Considering the way the Ron Paul movement has diffused into a disintegrated vapor, imagine what the alt-right is going to be like in 5-10 years.

The vast majority of his voters wouldn't know Bolton from Jeff Tucker.

That's what they said about Obama and the SJWs.
 
MAGA is dead if he picks Bolton as SoS. It's that simple. There can be no rationalization.

Yes, it would be dead.

Yes, it is that simple.

Yes, there can be no rationalization (though rationalizations would be offered nonetheless).

How do any of these things contradict what I have said?

RPF trumpies are under the impression that the vast majority of trump voters are alt-right. Alt-right is the smallest fringe of trump support. He owes them nothing and it's unlikely he will acknowledge them in any capacity. His accidental alt-right retweets were quickly rescinded when his campaign recognized the mistakes.

He'd be correct to continue to ignore them. Considering the way the Ron Paul movement has diffused into a disintegrated vapor, imagine what the alt-right is going to be like in 5-10 years.

The vast majority of his voters wouldn't know Bolton from Jeff Tucker.

Exactly.

Alt-righters are in for a rude awakening - just as were those Ron Paul supporters who, blinded by their own enthusiasm, fooled themselves into thinking that freedom is popular.
 
Meet your establishment-in-chief.

Donald trump, the outsider....

Lol

Lol

Lolz

Yep, "Drain the swamp" apparently is the 2016 'R' version of "Hope and change"

Everyone should watch this:




and this, from 9 years ago:

 
Alt-righters are in for a rude awakening - just as were those Ron Paul supporters who, blinded by their own enthusiasm, fooled themselves into thinking that freedom is popular.

And Trump will be in for a rude awakening if he pulls a bait and switch...

“Violent Revolution If Trump Lets Them Down”: People Remain Poised for Angry Revolt – Roberts

“Revolution is probably the only solution.”

That seems to be the conclusion of Paul Craig Roberts, a respected member of Reagan’s Administration and former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.

The crisis has simply been building.

Like others, Dr. Roberts highlights the promises of Donald Trump and the reasons behind his sweeping populist victory.

However, he warns that if Trump “pulls an Obama” and sells out the people to whom he has promised change, violent revolution will likely be the result – because the rage against the machine is “permanent.”

He told the Richie Allen Show:

Paul Craig Roberts: “The good thing about the election is it showed the American people could defeat the establishment; it could defeat the oligarchs; it could defeat their candidate. So that is a good thing; it shows that the people finally woke up. They understood that a lot was at risk. They were not being served by the government – and the fact that they realized this. They are not as insouciant as they have been. They are more aware. They were determined; they were not influenced by the propaganda against Trump. And so that’s what’s good, and this will stay. I think this will be permanent.

Now if Trump pulls and Obama and sells them out, the question is will they get demoralized and give up, or do they get more angry and the next time we see a bloody revolution. You know, sometimes, when you had so much corruption – in the United States, every institution is totally corrupt, everyone. The oligarchy have corrupted everything. When you get so much corruption, sometimes you can’t have a change without bloodshed. People have to die.

Richie Allen: “And you’re a pacifist.”

Roberts: “Our founding fathers were aware of this. Thomas Jefferson was explicit about it. So what we may see if Trump is blocked or he gives up or nothing can happen, people they could just give up or they could just get angry.”

Why? Because people are fed up with the establishment, hungry for change and too desperate to ignore the crisis they are in.

The economic situation alone has driven the masses to the edge. Without a decent standard of living and a secure place in or near the middle class, things are going to be unstable and ripe for a volatile chemical reaction.

Although Paul Craig Roberts statements seem alarming, they are in line with everything that has been happening economically, and secondarily politically, for the past several cycles and through the entire Obama presidency.

Watch the full interview via The Richie Allen Show:


The US presidential election is historic, because the American people were able to defeat the oligarchs. Hillary Clinton, an agent for the Oligarchy, was defeated despite the vicious media campaign against Donald Trump. This shows that the media and the political establishments of the political parties no longer have credibility with the American people.

It remains to be seen whether Trump can select and appoint a government that will serve him and his goals to restore American jobs and to establish friendly and respectful relations with Russia, China, Syria, and Iran.

It also remains to be seen how the Oligarchy will respond to Trump’s victory. Wall Street and the Federal Reserve can cause an economic crisis in order to put Trump on the defensive, and they can use the crisis to force Trump to appoint one of their own as Secretary of the Treasury.

[…] We won’t know what to expect until we see who are the Secretaries and Assistant Secretaries. If it is the usual crowd, we will know Trump has been captured.

[…] If Trump is advised to be conciliatory, to hold out his hand, and to take the establishment into his government, the American people will again be disappointed. In a country whose institutions have been so completely corrupted by the Oligarchy, it is difficult to achieve real change without bloodshed.

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/violent-revolution-if-trump-lets-them-down-people-remain-poised-for-angry-revolt-roberts_11102016
 
Last edited:

The good thing is that his son DJT jr is in close contact with us. If Trump starts to bolt, he will hear it. I'm not that worried though. Trump is a maverick.

I really think he will be assassinated when he refuses to bend knee to the globalists. Like Roger Stone has stated many times, NO ONE TELLS DONALD TRUMP WHAT TO DO.
 
Last edited:
And Trump will be in for a rude awakening if he pulls a bait and switch...

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-ne...main-poised-for-angry-revolt-roberts_11102016

The vast majority of Trump supporters DO NOT feel this way.

Those who do are a tiny but vocal minority who have allowed their enthusiam to blind themselves to the just-stated fact.

(I heard the same sort of wild-eyed predictions about what would happen if Ron Paul didn't win.)

Aside from this, I can only refer to what I said early about pink unicorn farts ...
 
I'm going to say this once more, typing as slowly as I can this time: in the unlikely event that Trump appoints Bolton, the vast majority of Trump supporters either won't say doodly-squat about it or they will make excuses for it. As I've previously pointed out, we already have an example of a Giuliani apologia right here at RPFs, of all places ...
Whatever dood. this hypothetical argument is stupid. he is not appointing John Bolton.

Fucking sick of the sore losers who were claiming for 18 months he didn;t stand a chance, and spent their entire time finding everything negative they can about him, and ignoring all the positives, suddenly now telling us their doom and gloom predictions for the future. You were wrong back then. Your media you link to now was wrong. I am going to wait for the actions of the man, and ignore all you naysayers. Fact is, at this moment, it does not matter. He will do what he is going to do. It will not be worse than Hilda would have been. he has already shown he has no problem smashing the establishment. So all you dorks talking like you know what he is going to do, YOU HAVE BEEN CATASTROPHICALLY WRONG ABOUT HIM ALREADY.
 
Last edited:
The good thing is that his son DJT jr is in close contact with us. If Trump starts to bolt, he will hear it. I'm not that worried though. Trump is a maverick.

I really think he will be assassinated when he refuses to bend knee to the globalists. Like Roger Stone has stated many times, NO ONE TELLS DONALD TRUMP WHAT TO DO.

No one tells Donald what to do. He has his own deeply held Nationalist socialist beliefs that he adheres to.
 
Whatever dood. this hypothetical argument is stupid. he is not appointing John Bolton.

$#@!ing sick of the sore losers who were claiming for 18 months he didn;t stand a chance, and spent their entire time finding everything negative they can about him, and ignoring all the positives, suddenly now telling us their doom and gloom predictions for the future. You were wrong back then. Your media you link to now was wrong. I am going to wait for the actions of the man, and ignore all you naysayers. Fact is, at this moment, it does not matter. He will do what he is going to do. It will not be worse than Hilda would have been. he has already shown he has no problem smashing the establishment. So all you dorks talking like you know what he is going to do, YOU HAVE BEEN CATASTROPHICALLY WRONG ABOUT HIM ALREADY.

waaa waaa

Here's a link to his website. Check out his establishment-smashing plan to make government bigger and badder than ever.
 
Whatever dood. this hypothetical argument is stupid. he is not appointing John Bolton.

I'm not the one who bought up the hypothetical. I was simply arguing about it with the person who did.

So if you don't like it, go whine and snivel at him, "dood."

Fucking sick of the sore losers who were claiming for 18 months he didn;t stand a chance, [...]

I have never claimed he didn't stand a chance.

So go whine and snivel at someone who did, "dood."

[...] and spent their entire time finding everything negative they can about him suddenly now telling us their doom and gloom predictions for the future.

I rarely posted about him at all, let alone did I spend my "entire time finding everything negative [I could] about him."

So go whine and snivel at someone who did, "dood."

You were wrong back then.

So far, I haven't been wrong about any of the few things I said about him "back then" (which basically amounted to no more than "he's a populist authoritarian" - which he clearly is).

So go whine and snivel at someone who was, "dood."

Your media you link to now was wrong.

I haven't posted any links to media (positive or negative) about Trump.

So go whine and snivel at someone who has, "dood."

I am going to wait for the actions of the man, and ignore all you naysayers. Fact is, at this moment, it does not matter. He will do what he is going to do. It will not be worse than Hilda would have been. he has already shown he has no problem smashing the establishment.

Of course you're going to wait. You have to. You don't have any choice. Because despite all your "rah-rah" blather and bluster, he hasn't done jack shit yet. He certainly hasn't shown that "he has no problem smashing the establishment" - last time I checked, the establishment was still there and doing just fine. And as the OP article indicates, the establishment is already lining up its ducks to ensure business as usual ...
 
Last edited:
I rarely posted about him at all, let alone did I spend my "entire time finding everything negative [I could] about him."
.

Oh, you must think I didn't notice you in the 2016 elections thread, and what you were writing.
Maybe you think I have amnesia.
You are lying to my face now.
Loser.
he hasn't done jack $#@! yet
He won the election.
he called out the system for being rigged.
Already Canada and Mexico said they are willing to renegotiate the NAFTA
Already NATO has stated they are willing to enforce the spending quotas of national companies.

Just because you are ignorant about things, does not mean he hasn't done anything.
 
rarely posted about him at all, let alone did I spend my "entire time finding everything negative [I could] about him."
Oh, you must think I didn't notice you in the 2016 elections thread, and what you were writing.
Maybe you think I have amnesia.
You are lying to my face now.
Loser.

I didn't say I never posted about him, you illiterate fuckwit.

I said "I rarely posted about him at all" - the context being the last "18 months" you specified.

(And you're pretty full of yourself if you think I think about you at all.)

He won the election.
he called out the system for being rigged.
Already Canada and Mexico said they are willing to renegotiate the NAFTA
Already NATO has stated they are willing to enforce the spending quotas of national companies.

Just because you are ignorant about things, does not mean he hasn't done anything.

All talk and more talk. Get back to me when the establishment has been smashed.

I'll wait.
 
He won the election.
he called out the system for being rigged.
Already Canada and Mexico said they are willing to renegotiate the NAFTA
Already NATO has stated they are willing to enforce the spending quotas of national companies.
All talk and more talk.
No, those are facts. Not speculation, facts. Learn the difference, masterspeculator.

"called out" ... "said" ... "stated" ... all are synonyms for "talked about."

IOW: "All talk and more talk." Just like I said.

Again, get back to me when the establishment has been smashed ...
 
Back
Top