Meet The Southern Poverty Law Center

Most of the people the SPLC calls racists are racists

What a ignorant and accusation. You mean like anarcho-capitalists, or the Tenth Amendment Center, or Oathkeepers, or various Tea Party groups, or the Constitution Party, or Ron Paul supporters, Family Research Council, or lewrockwell.com, or WeAreChange.org, Freedom's Phoenix, Alliance Defending Freedom, Liberty Counsel, WoldNetDaily, Gun Owners of America/Larry Pratt, Eagle Forum, former Libertarian Party Presidential nominee Michael Badnarik, Chuck Baldwin, Joe Bannister, Alex Jones, Doug Casey, and many many others which have all been targeted victims by SPLC smear campaign as extremist or hate groups.

The SPLC is a fraud, a fake scaremonger, a scam.
 
The SPLC is an extreme leftist political activist organization pushing radical collectivist leftist ideology under the masquerade of fighting hate groups. Their website is plastered with pictures vile hate spewing of swastikas and nutzo Klansman (which is mostly FBI provocateurs leading and exploiting semi-retarded patsies). Of course these are insignificant nothings, roundly and nearly universally condemned and virtually zero power and influence.

Having no legitimate real opposition targets to use for scaremongering and more importantly fundraising, the SPLC has to manufacture fictional, imaginary hate groups to condemn so it can con more dupes to fill its coffers with millions. Racketeering in fear and defamation for riches. Of which, between 68 to 89% of revenues are poured right back into more fundraising efforts. https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/splc_fs_103116.pdf

So the SPLC goes after a myriad of unrelated others, many of which are philosophically and ideologically diametrically opposite of the vile collectivist outfits noted above. Under its “Hatewatch” tab it specifically states its goal is to expose not hate, but rather the “American radical right.” Of course to SPLC, anyone who does not subscribe to its leftist ideology is “radical right.”

The goal is to irrationally smear and associate all those that disagree with their totalitarian leftist political ideology as somehow connected and the moral equivalent of Nazis and Klansmen. These targets of the SPLC include libertarians, conservatives, Christians, free marketers, and anyone they disagree with politically.

Specific targets of the SPLC have included Ron Paul supporters, Oathkeepers, WeAreChange.org , the Bundy ranchers, border security advocates, lewrockwell.com, Tenth Amendment Center, Tea Party groups, Alliance Defending Freedom, Family Research Council, National Christian Foundation, Center for Immigration Studies, WorldNetDaily, Alex Jones, the Constitution Party, Freedom’s Phoenix, Doug Casey, Michael Badnarik, Liberty Dollar, anarcho-capitalist, Eagle Forum and many more

The SPLC is nothing more than a money begging fraudulent scam political operation.

More:
http://thoughtsonliberty.com/militi...roups-coupled-with-kkk-neo-nazis-in-new-study
http://tomwoods.com/splc-attacks-dangerous-extremists/
http://libertarianviewpoint.com/blog/southern-poverty-law-center-hit-list/
http://reason.com/blog/2012/12/17/short-of-actually-scary-people-splc-targ
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...0f9bdd74ed1_story.html?utm_term=.d540cef7ab44
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017...being-funded-by-liberal-billionaires-why.html
http://www.constitutionpreservation.org/articles/may-7-2010/southern-poverty-law-center-hit-list
https://archive.is/lpQ5k
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017...e-list-it-s-smear-and-don-t-belong-there.html
http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF17J27.pdf
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/op...-southern-poverty-law-centers-scam/666904001/
http://www.resistancemedia.org/2017/05/exposing-southern-poverty-law-center.html
http://humanevents.com/2006/12/11/southern-poverty-law-center-pushes-twisted-definition-of-hate/
http://www.weeklystandard.com/king-of-fearmongers/article/714573
http://www.weeklystandard.com/section/splc
 
Sounds like a good time to post this handy booklet on the SPLC and the ADL

http://fakehatecrimes.org/The-Watchdogs-by-Laird-Wilcox.pdf

Forward

Any criticism of so-called anti-racist “Watchdog”1 organizations and activists is not
without its perils. In the “either/or” and “good guys versus bad guys” mentality that
characterizes the moral absolutism of the anti-racist milieu it’s easy to be misunderstood.
Most people, unaware of the ideological roots of many anti-racist activists or their general
disdain for the civil liberties of their critics, regard them as reasonable response to
legitimate grievances - which in certain cases they may be.
...
There is an anti-racist industry entrenched in the United States that has attracted
bullying, moralizing fanatics, whose identity and livelihood depend upon growth and
expansion of their particular kind of victimization. In certain respects the anti-racist
movement has become a massive extortion racket, as lawyers have used every nuance of
civil rights and equal opportunity laws to extract massive judgments for objectively lesser
offenses, and anti-racist street fanatics have attacked and vilified individuals for their
values, opinions and beliefs. This is not what the civil rights movement was originally
about.
This was not written in 2016 but 20 years ago
 
Yes, we do, when the SPLC, which has the ear of government, labels us domestic terrorists.

Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

Chance that us throwing in our lot with teocons/Trumpkins/Levin/Beck/Hannity/similar-douches helps said douches and hurts us politically? 100%
 
"I'm mad that those racists correctly called me a racist." -Most People Either Applauding/Criticizing The SPLC

Wrong.

Most of the people the SPLC calls racists are racists (from frothing at the mouth NAZIs to the relatively harmless Mexicuns r takin muh jerbs types). And, on the other side, most of the people supporting the SPLC are also racists (from Black Panther types to mindless liberal arts drones). My overarching point (...which needs to be made a lot these days), is that libertarians don't have a dog in this fight. The culture war (of which the back and forth about the SPLC is an example) is being fought between two equally monstrous groups that both hate our guts and we shouldn't be rooting for either.

Wrong.

Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

Chance that us throwing in our lot with teocons/Trumpkins/Levin/Beck/Hannity/similar-douches helps said douches and hurts us politically? 100%

Strawman. No one is throwing in with anyone over this. You are either terribly naive, or you have some other agenda.
 
SPLC Defends Antifa:

"the Soviet Poverty Lie Center (SPLC) ... has refused to label “Antifa” as one of its “hate groups.” [Yet] The Singing Nuns are on its list … as is almost every conservative and libertarian organization in America. The American Enterprise Institute was condemned by the SPLC … It was the SPLC, under contract with the Department of Fatherland Security, that advised during the Obama administration that anyone with a “Ron Paul for President’ bumper sticker should be considered to be a potential terrorist. …"
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Sounds like a good time to post this handy booklet on the SPLC and the ADL

http://fakehatecrimes.org/The-Watchdogs-by-Laird-Wilcox.pdf

There is an anti-racist industry entrenched in the United States that has attracted
bullying, moralizing fanatics, whose identity and livelihood depend upon growth and
expansion of their particular kind of victimization. In certain respects the anti-racist
movement has become a massive extortion racket, as lawyers have used every nuance of
civil rights and equal opportunity laws to extract massive judgments for objectively lesser
offenses, and anti-racist street fanatics have attacked and vilified individuals for their
values, opinions and beliefs. This is not what the civil rights movement was originally
about.


This was not written in 2016 but 20 years ago

Which is why I have adopted a "no fuck's given" attitude towards being labeled "racist" (or any other -ist or -phobe for that matter).
 
Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

Seeing as how the SPLC already has, the chance is actually 100%, which equals to R3.0 once again exposing his ignorance.

The SPLC authored the MIAC Fusion Center Report that identified "potential domestic terrorists" as including":

outspoken critics of a Con-Con, critics of NAU, critics of human use of RFID, opponents of abortion, opponents of immigration policies, survivalists training, preppers, critics of the Federal Reserve, member of or people who display or posses material from "Constitutional Party, Campaign for Liberty, or Libertarian material", "supporters of former Presidential Candidate: Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr", people who display or distribute Gadsen flag, Molon labe, Aaron Russo's America:Freedom to Fascism, Zeitgeist the Movie, among many others.


In addition, the SPLC published its absurd "extremist" list of potential domestic terrorist enablers watch list ("hit list") [since been taken down from its website] that included:
1. Chuck Baldwin, Pastor, Radio Broadcaster, Syndicated Columnist, 2008 Constitution Party Presidential nominee.
2. Joe Banister, former IRS special agent, tax protester.
3. Martin "Red" Beckman, tax protester
4. Catherine Bleish, head of the Liberty Restoration Project.
5. Chris Broughton, Second Amendment advocate, member of "We The People" group.
6. Bob Campbell, head of American Grand Jury.
7. Robert Crooks, Army veteran, retired commercial fisherman, anti-illegal immigration proponent.
8. Joseph Farah, CEO of World Net Daily
9. Gary Franchi, producer of "Camp FEMA: American Lockdown," national director of RestoreTheRepublic.com.
10. Al Garza, head of the Patriot's Coalition, an anti-illegal immigration group.
11. Ted Gunderson, retired FBI agent.
12. John Hassey, "The public face of Alabama's militia movement in the late 1990s," says SPLC.
13. Alex Jones, Radio Talk Show host.
14. Devvy Kidd, "prolific columnist, blogger, and public speaker."
15. Larry Kilgore, telecommunications consultant, former US Senate candidate from Texas, pro-secession advocate.
16. Cliff Kincaid, syndicated columnist and author, editor of AIM Report (Accuracy in Media's publication), founder and president of America's Survival, Inc., a UN watchdog group.
17. Mark Koernke, associated with the now-defunct Michigan Militia.
18. Richard Mack, former Graham County, Arizona, Sheriff, author, and public speaker.
19. Jack McLamb, former Phoenix, Arizona, police officer, author, and public speaker.
20. John McManus, former member of the US Marine Corps, president of the John Birch Society.
21. Daniel New, father of Michael New (the Army medic who refused to wear a UN uniform), author, public speaker.
22. Norm Olson, founder of the now-defunct Michigan Militia.
23. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America.
24. Stewart Rhodes, Army veteran and Yale Law School graduate, founder of Oath Keepers.
25. Jon Roland, computer specialist, founder of the Constitution Society.
26. Luke Rudkowski, founder We Are Change.
27. Robert "Bob" Schultz, founder of We The People.
28. Joel Skousen, editor, World Affairs Brief.
29. Jim Stachowiak, Radio Talk Show host, "Longtime militia organizer," claims SPLC.
30. John Stadtmiller, founder, Republic Broadcasting Network.
31. Orly Taitz, California attorney, a leader in the push to make President Obama disclose his US birth certificate.
32. Amanda Teegarden, executive director of Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise.
33. Mike Vanderboegh, anti-Obama health care activist.
34. Paul Venable, former candidate for the Idaho House of Representatives.
35. Edwin Vieira, Jr., attorney, author, proponent of constitutional State militias, lecturer.
36. Michele Bachmann, US Representative from Minnesota.
37. Glenn Beck, Fox News Channel TV host.
38. Paul Broun, medical doctor, US Representative from Georgia.
39. Andrew Napolitano, attorney, former State judge in New Jersey, Fox News Channel legal analyist, lecturer.​
40. Ron Paul, former member of the US Air Force, medical doctor, US Representative from Texas, 2008 Republican candidate for President.​


OMG. Look at all those scary "potential terrorists" - Ron Paul, Andrew Napolitano, Luke Rudkowski, Chuck Baldwin. Sure looks like a who's who of potential recruits for Washington's next ISIS, Al Qaeda, or patsy.

Yep, SPLC sure seems like a real responsible organization that R3.0 keeps trying to run cover for.
 
Last edited:
Most of the people the SPLC calls racists are racists (from frothing at the mouth NAZIs to the relatively harmless Mexicuns r takin muh jerbs types).

They lump like the KKK in with Center for Immigration Studies for a reason. It is meant to shutdown debate.

Here is an example. Mark Krikorian is a "Mexicans take jobs" Republican in the Pat Buchanan mold. I don't agree with that argument, but it is a legitimate debate. I have watched him argue his points on Stossel and came across very well. Putting a center-right, National Review Republican on their list of HATE groups is beyond ridiculous.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...0f9bdd74ed1_story.html?utm_term=.d459b93cf53b

My overarching point (...which needs to be made a lot these days), is that libertarians don't have a dog in this fight.

Well. Ron Paul gets put on their lists. https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...33i21k1j33i22i29i30k1j33i160k1.54.lul7fYuNMfI
 
Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

You said that out loud.

You can't seriously believe it to be true.. This Forum has documented proof to the contrary.

So,, Why would you post something so demonstrably false,, but downright stupid?
 
You said that out loud.

You can't seriously believe it to be true.. This Forum has documented proof to the contrary.

So,, Why would you post something so demonstrably false,, but downright stupid?
'

Because he is a reality detached person who refuses to believe their are enemies/ people who differ from him/his world view and sees them/him as a threat.
 
You said that out loud.

You can't seriously believe it to be true.. This Forum has documented proof to the contrary.

So,, Why would you post something so demonstrably false,, but downright stupid?

I'm not being put in a camp by the Deep State™.

The regular state is, however, continuing to consume an ever-increasing share of gross domestic product.

..but I guess we're better off because tell-it-like-it-is-TV-boy-that's-entertaining-what-a-breath-of-fresh-air-though-nothing-actually-changed.
 
Back
Top