Mediate: Breitbart Writer Begs Libertarians To Vote Romney — Sorry, It Ain’t Going To Work

[Indy Vidual]

I'd rather vote for Scary Johnson, than Flippy-flopper.

 

[american.swan]

Hey Breitbart writers....

I can't stop laughing at this response.

 

[acptulsa]

I hear a number of people say that Romney and Obama are the same but that is impossible as different people will always pursue different agendas. I for one think that any judges nominated by Romney will show more respect to the Constitution that any Obama nominees who have proven themselves to believe in a government with almost no limits on power. Nope, there are differences and I will end up voting with my nose plugged for the person most likely to get rid of Obama. I can't stand to see four more years of trillion dollar annual deficits with the only plan Obama proposes is to spend more and tax more. If you can't see differences you have blinders on. Just my thoughts.

Democrats told us four years ago that if we couldn't see the difference between Dubya and Obama we had blinders on. They just knew their messiah was a man of peace; he saw Dubya's two wars and raised him three police actions. He has added to Dubya's judges who ignore half the Bill of Rights a judge who ignores the other half of the Bill of Rights. He responded to the fact that Dubya's defecits helped shake confidence in the U.S. to the core by continuting to drive the debt up.

Now we say to you what we said to them four years ago: If you can't see the similarities, you're the one with blinders on. And no amount of short term thinking will get us out of this mess, any more than four decades of short term thinking has headed off this mess. Your thought process has led the Titanic right to the iceberg; when will it become obvious to you that this thought process won't slow the sinking either?

 

[tremendoustie]

I hear a number of people say that Romney and Obama are the same but that is impossible as different people will always pursue different agendas. I for one think that any judges nominated by Romney will show more respect to the Constitution that any Obama nominees who have proven themselves to believe in a government with almost no limits on power.

Ha! Romney himself doesn't respect the constitution.

Nope, there are differences

What differences? Your blind hope that Romney judges will be better, despite all evidence to the contrary?

and I will end up voting with my nose plugged for the person most likely to get rid of Obama. I can't stand to see four more years of trillion dollar annual deficits with the only plan Obama proposes is to spend more and tax more.

Which is exactly what Bush did, and exactly what Romney will do.

Maybe they'll just spend and borrow/inflate, because that's so much better.

If you can't see differences you have blinders on. Just my thoughts.

If you see differences you're listening to too much Sean Hannity.

They're both:
- Pro war/military interventionism
- Pro bailout
- Pro stimulus
- Pro foreign "aid"
- Pro DHS/TSA
- Pro warrantless wiretaps/PATRIOT act
- Pro extrajudicial detentions/killings/NDAA
- Pro federal control of education and healthcare
- Anti gun (supported brady bill, "assault" weapons ban, Romney got D- from GOA)
- Pro federal reserve control of monetary policy
- Pro drug war, even against sick people with a perscription
- Anti significant spending cuts (Romney said cuts would "remove" money from the economy).


The only difference is the letter next to their names, plus bluster and marketing.

But, here are a few things to consider:

- Unless the Ds nominate a pro-liberty presidential candidate in 2016, which I'm not holding my breath for, a Romney win means no pro liberty option for 8 years.
- When the crash/default comes, which it will, "free markets" will be blamed with Romney as president, despite the fact that he has nothing to do with "free markets", because that's the rhetoric/sales pitch he uses.
- A romney win strongly pushes the R party in the big government direction, and makes efforts at reform yet more difficult.

 

[Czolgosz]

Hey Breitbart writers....

Succinct.

 

[rich34]

I hear a number of people say that Romney and Obama are the same but that is impossible as different people will always pursue different agendas. I for one think that any judges nominated by Romney will show more respect to the Constitution that any Obama nominees who have proven themselves to believe in a government with almost no limits on power. Nope, there are differences and I will end up voting with my nose plugged for the person most likely to get rid of Obama. I can't stand to see four more years of trillion dollar annual deficits with the only plan Obama proposes is to spend more and tax more. If you can't see differences you have blinders on. Just my thoughts.

No blinders here at all, but to act as if we're still not going to get trillion dollar deficits, ignoring of the constitution, etc... under Romney tells me someone is wearing blinders and it's not.the majority here..

 

[qh4dotcom]

After all the lying, cheating, vote fraud, rule changes and debate marginalization the Romney campaign made Ron Paul go through......I pledge to never vote for Mitt Romney.

 

[Czolgosz]

I stopped believing the Republican Party (a non-profit organization) would actually produce limited government candidates, after a couple election cycles.


Only a *fool* would continue giving money, time, and support to that non-profit organization...except in the instance whereby a real candidate is associated with this particular non-profit. Had to provide the caveat.

 

[sailingaway]

NOBP for me....

 

[supermario21]

- A romney win strongly pushes the R party in the big government direction, and makes efforts at reform yet more difficult.

I don't know if I agree about that in terms of the direction of the party. I see Romney as more of a place holder who will listen to whoever wins the internal struggles within the party. Even though we have a long way to go, the party is trending in our direction and away from the neocons like Graham and McCain.

 

[sailingaway]

I don't know if I agree about that in terms of the direction of the party. I see Romney as more of a place holder who will listen to whoever wins the internal struggles within the party. Even though we have a long way to go, the party is trending in our direction and away from the neocons like Graham and McCain.

Romney 'listens' and 'says' whenever popular, but he 'acts' for the banks. At least, looking at his donations, that seems to be who is funding him.

 

[RonPaulFanInGA]

Mediate: Breitbart Writer Begs Libertarians To Vote Romney

Romney will lose with or without the Libertarian Party's 0.5% national base of support.

 

[acptulsa]

Romney will lose with or without the Libertarian Party's 0.5% national base of support.

lol

Apples and oranges. You know they're talking about libertarians, not just Libertarian Party members. And you also know that 'writer', 'begs', 'vote' and 'to' are not capitalized except when used in a headline, either.

 

[RonPaulFanInGA]

And you also know that 'writer', 'begs', 'vote' and 'to' are not capitalized except when used in a headline, either.

Which is great, because I was quoting the 'headline' of this thread, as it was written.

 

[tremendoustie]

I don't know if I agree about that in terms of the direction of the party. I see Romney as more of a place holder who will listen to whoever wins the internal struggles within the party. Even though we have a long way to go, the party is trending in our direction and away from the neocons like Graham and McCain.

and Romney. Oh wait, they nominated him for president. And they nominated McCain last time. And Graham is still in office. As is McCain.

I agree with you about the direction of the party -- currently.

If Romney loses, that will continue and strengthen. If he wins, the republican party will be the party of Romney -- just as Obama policy has drastically changed the D party platform.

They need to fail every time they try to run big government corpratist/militarists. This is the way to push the neocons out of the party.

 

[acptulsa]

Which is great, because I was quoting the 'headline' of this thread, as it was written.

You seem very proud of yourself. But control C/control V just isn't all that hard to master.

I suppose a small town newspaper with a headline that reads, 'Bush Chopped Down' should change it to 'bush Chopped Down' for fear you confuse the event with an assassination?

 

[Czolgosz]

bush was assassinated?!?!?

 

[jbauer]

I hear a number of people say that Romney and Obama are the same but that is impossible as different people will always pursue different agendas. I for one think that any judges nominated by Romney will show more respect to the Constitution that any Obama nominees who have proven themselves to believe in a government with almost no limits on power. Nope, there are differences and I will end up voting with my nose plugged for the person most likely to get rid of Obama. I can't stand to see four more years of trillion dollar annual deficits with the only plan Obama proposes is to spend more and tax more. If you can't see differences you have blinders on. Just my thoughts.

I'm sure you've gotten picked apart on this already over the next 3 pages but what evidence do you have to suggest that Rmoney would pick better justices?

 

[jbauer]

Democrats told us four years ago that if we couldn't see the difference between Dubya and Obama we had blinders on. They just knew their messiah was a man of peace; he saw Dubya's two wars and raised him three police actions. He has added to Dubya's judges who ignore half the Bill of Rights a judge who ignores the other half of the Bill of Rights. He responded to the fact that Dubya's defecits helped shake confidence in the U.S. to the core by continuting to drive the debt up.

Now we say to you what we said to them four years ago: If you can't see the similarities, you're the one with blinders on. And no amount of short term thinking will get us out of this mess, any more than four decades of short term thinking has headed off this mess. Your thought process has led the Titanic right to the iceberg; when will it become obvious to you that this thought process won't slow the sinking either?

Bravo!!

 

[sailingaway]

Romney will lose with or without the Libertarian Party's 0.5% national base of support.

No one is talking about the Libertarian PARTY, but the libertarian leaning voters in all parties, who vote independent of party and are fed up.