constituent
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
- Messages
- 13,724
don't know if it's been said, but i have video/no audio.
MEDIA ADVISORY:Request For Coverage - Debra Medina holds press conference in Houston
- Thread starter TXcarlosTX
- Start date
don't know if it's been said, but i have video/no audio.
Eric21ND
Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2007
- Messages
- 5,954
I wrote Ron Paul in the snow with pee!
Oh yah, i remember you... They ran that on fox news over and over again as proof that ron paul supporters were degenerate cannibals! Way to Co-intelpro our asses bro!
Number19
Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,334
Thanks, I know enough to know how much I don't know. It's frustrating at times.
qh4dotcom
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2008
- Messages
- 5,931
Shhhhh! Don't out me man.. ;-) how ya been?
It's probably been said already and I just missed it.
During one of Beck's tirades in response to a call from one of his viewers, he implied that Debra's response to his question on 9/11 (the answer to which he distorted into another meaning) meant she wasn't trustworthy of holding power as governor. Now, from that statement, the viewer can clearly see the establishment is scared silly of our movement which intends to put a constitutional candidate like Medina or McBerry into power. We're definitely on the right track. Beck's calculated use of the 9/11 issue indicates to me that the establishment has basically decided to use 9/11 as a litmus test for constitutional candidates whether the question is appropriate or not. The establishment is simply that terrified of us. They revealed their vulnerability in spades with Beck's shenanigans. Now, as constitutionalists, we need to capitalize on their vulnerability especially for governorships. Will mistakes be made? Yes. Was the Medina interview with Beck a mistake? The latter issue remains an open question as the electorate in Texas must make that determination, and Medina's actions must reassure the electorate. Medina future actions, e.g. today's press conference, will weigh heavily in the decisions of the electorate. She must tread carefully and astutely.
Although I'm indifferent to Debra answering the 9/11 question posed by Beck, the question is now thankfully in the view of the public again. When a candidate can finally express doubts about the official version of events before the public without recrimination, our movement will finally succeed in restoring constitutional liberty. The decision isn't ours to make independent of the indoctrinated masses unfortunately, but the masses must move in our direction of truth or we'll have gained nothing, but the status quo. The ball is in the court of public opinion. Have the masses moved to more critical, independent thought? We'll find out how long the masses want to watch the ball being batted across the table from Perry to Hutchison before they tire of the game, reach out, and grab the ball.
During one of Beck's tirades in response to a call from one of his viewers, he implied that Debra's response to his question on 9/11 (the answer to which he distorted into another meaning) meant she wasn't trustworthy of holding power as governor. Now, from that statement, the viewer can clearly see the establishment is scared silly of our movement which intends to put a constitutional candidate like Medina or McBerry into power. We're definitely on the right track. Beck's calculated use of the 9/11 issue indicates to me that the establishment has basically decided to use 9/11 as a litmus test for constitutional candidates whether the question is appropriate or not. The establishment is simply that terrified of us. They revealed their vulnerability in spades with Beck's shenanigans. Now, as constitutionalists, we need to capitalize on their vulnerability especially for governorships. Will mistakes be made? Yes. Was the Medina interview with Beck a mistake? The latter issue remains an open question as the electorate in Texas must make that determination, and Medina's actions must reassure the electorate. Medina future actions, e.g. today's press conference, will weigh heavily in the decisions of the electorate. She must tread carefully and astutely.
Although I'm indifferent to Debra answering the 9/11 question posed by Beck, the question is now thankfully in the view of the public again. When a candidate can finally express doubts about the official version of events before the public without recrimination, our movement will finally succeed in restoring constitutional liberty. The decision isn't ours to make independent of the indoctrinated masses unfortunately, but the masses must move in our direction of truth or we'll have gained nothing, but the status quo. The ball is in the court of public opinion. Have the masses moved to more critical, independent thought? We'll find out how long the masses want to watch the ball being batted across the table from Perry to Hutchison before they tire of the game, reach out, and grab the ball.
Last edited:
Badger Paul
Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
- Messages
- 3,718
The difference is Debra is serious, Beck is a self-professed "rodeo clown"
He's knows his job is to be the establishment's comic relief and he also knows its his job to keep the Freedom movement down.
He's knows his job is to be the establishment's comic relief and he also knows its his job to keep the Freedom movement down.
The Eradicator
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 38
Here's some video from it. http://www.bigjolly.com/sections/texas/271-psst-lets-talk-about-debra-medina.html
Terrific response by Debra. However, any interview with Beck wouldn't have been much better.
Similar threads
