McMahon Spends $2 million in 2 Weeks

Source, please.

Are you ignoring every fact I write that is contrary to your ridiculous claims? Or are you ignoring what I'm writing because I didn't originate the ideas in question? I'm defending another member rational enough to find your posts stupid and humiliatingly crude. Do you really need a fact check from me?

G-Wohl said:
Vince McMahon entered the industry, following in his father's footsteps (source), and Linda McMahon (his wife for only a few years by this point - source) followed along. Linda McMahon only got involved with the business in 1993 when she was made president during the steroids scandal the company faced that year, which lasted until 2000 (source).

cheapseats said:
FACTS are incontrovertible, YOU INSOLENT AND OPPORTUNISTIC FUCK.

And facts are separate from reality how, exactly? :rolleyes:

By the way, what's wrong being opportunistic? That's the strangest (most complimentary) insult I've ever heard of.

cheapseats said:
Do you suppose the Brains Of The Outfit wasn't available for the interview, and that Forbes was being pissy about rescheduling?

What exactly are you trying to say here? Are you attempting to show that Linda McMahon was indeed the CEO of WWE? And - if that is what you're attempting to show - could you not find a better demonstration of this than some arbitrary interview video from over a year ago? Even forgoing the obvious fact that NOBODY here denies that she used to be the CEO of WWE, this whole post seems useless and unimportant.
 
Picking up the dry cleaning, making sure there is toilet paper and toothpaste, that kind of stuff?

LOL! I don't think she bothers with that stuff. They're way too rich. They probably have a bunch of illegal immigrant servants in the house that handle the daily chores. Who knows what she does. Probably shops and gets her nails done. The occasional trip to the country club to socialize and play tennis. ;)
 
Cheapseats, what is your goal with this thread? Are you trying to convince people on this forum that McMahon would be a better senator than Schiff? If so, I'd say you're failing miserably. John McCain has an amazing biography - does anyone here care more about that than what he stands for? No.
 
Cheapset. This is a section of the forum dedicated to promoting Peter Schiff. If you want to criticize him and prop up his apponent; I'm sure you can find another forum on the internet where your view is encouraged.

I think I talk for most people when I say your anti-schiff views aren't welcome here.
 
Is it arrogance or collectivist thinking that presumes to speak for "most people"?

I am not "Anti Schiff." Peter Schiff is a zero in my world. But I DO object to how he rolls. Everyone satisfied with the efforts and expenditures he's making with their million bucks? Anyone still thinking that he can be United States Senator AND Investment Guru?

Is there really NO ONE but me who looks askance at someone who recommends that his "IN" crowd invests in China while he jockeys to steward the rest of us on pobrecito American economics?

I am not PRO anyone.

I am ANTI subscribing wholesale to GROUPTHINK via association.

This is a super interesting Board. For every loud-mouthed, ill-mannered, disrespectful, mercenary and superficial-thinking Whipper Snapper I have endured, I have also crossed paths with the most incredibly principled, honorable AND RESTRAINED men whose acquaintance it has EVER been my privilege to make. Men of few words and less bullshit.

Look at the number of members, and compare that with the number of active posters.

My words, my Truth, DOES resonate with some people. This is not one-size-fits-all. As well, I'da thought we'da learned our lesson about Messiah Complexes. I'da been wrong, of course.

Unlike you, I do NOT think I'm right about everything. But I DO know WHAT I think, and I don't have to produce a list of links to express it.

WHY is the Peter Schiff forum on the CAMPAIGN FOR LIBERTY/RON PAUL FORUMS sacrosanct? Why IS there a Peter Schiff forum on the CAMPAIGN FOR LIBERTY/RON PAUL FORUMS?

We need fresh blood in all 50 states. Some Political Hopefuls are more equal than others?

It is NOT a crime to think outside the box. Unless yer with Bush, Obama or -- you would suggest -- Ron Paul Extremists.

Ultimately, is the objective to WIN SEATS FOR OUR GUYS or REFORM AMERICA? They are NOT one and the same. If You/generic think so, you are not thinking.

That said, if this interloper DOES speak for the majority, pipe up. But, no, on the command of a few ZEALOTS, I'll not be run off an ostensibly Libertarian board.

There is more at stake than a few mortal men's egos, y'know.

Dude, I'm not telling you to go away; I'm saying this is the "Peter Schiff 2010" part of the board and it's kinda counter-productive to promote his apponent in this part of the board. I have absolutely no problem with you criticizing him in general politics. I'm just trying to say this is the area of the board where the grassroots are suppose to be able to plan grassroots things....
 
Dude, I'm not telling you to go away; I'm saying this is the "Peter Schiff 2010" part of the board and it's kinda counter-productive to promote his apponent in this part of the board. I have absolutely no problem with you criticizing him in general politics. I'm just trying to say this is the area of the board where the grassroots are suppose to be able to plan grassroots things....

Exactly! Peter Schiff 2010!

Cheapseats is probably Linda McLoser OR Loser McSimmons.
 
Cheapseats, Why have you responded to everything on this thread but this:

Where can I find out where Linda McMahon stands on bailouts, stimulus, nationalized healthcare, free trade, and cap & trade?

Shouldn't you know where the candidate you're shilling for stands?
 
Oh please, I don't like G-Wohl's attitude but cheapseats is nothing more than a shill for McMahon. Linda McMahon, the woman who TWICE donated to Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanual.

Ah, okay. Well reasonable criticism should be fine, but if cheapseats' criticism is not reasonable, then so be it. I choose not to wade through this mess of a thread, after seeing a preview of it.
 
These sub-forums are created for SUPPORTERS - Those who want to debate the merits of running any particular candidate NEEDS to do it outside of the SUPPORTER sub-forum. I will run out of patience REAL QUICK with people trolling candidate sub-furums. If people cannot control themselves they will be taking days off.

If you are a supporter and see obvious disrupters disrespecting the intent of the candidate SUPPORTER sub-forum, please just flag the posts, ignore the troll , and let us deal with them.

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Cheapseats, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and will take a look at Linda Mcmahon. I've been following Schiff for over a year now watching his youtube videos and sometimes listening to his weekly radio show. I am familiar with his stance on issues important to me. Where can I find out where Linda McMahon stands on bailouts, stimulus, nationalized healthcare, free trade, and cap & trade?

Am I actually reading this on a Peter Schiff discussion forum? If you aren't 100% committed to Peter Schiff and his campaign then please leave, you only weaken the resolve of the group as a whole. Some of us aren't afraid of Linda McMahon and still plan on donating our time and money to Peter. He is a smart man and knows what he is up against
 
Am I actually reading this on a Peter Schiff discussion forum? If you aren't 100% committed to Peter Schiff and his campaign then please leave, you only weaken the resolve of the group as a whole. Some of us aren't afraid of Linda McMahon and still plan on donating our time and money to Peter. He is a smart man and knows what he is up against

Tlbodine, did you read any of my subsequent posts in this thread? I donated before Schiff was even a candidate on the schiff2010 site. I have donated several more times since then, including today, when I just put up another $100. I have also advocated for Schiff on other forums - LINK.

My curiosity about Schiff's opponents comes from me wanting to know what Peter is up against. Notice that cheapseats replied and indeed fed off many responses - except mine. The fact that a McMahon supporter doesn't have an answer to simple issue questions displays what a weak candidate she really is.

How much have you donated? Do you still want me to leave the forum?
 
Back
Top