McDonalds Incident Proof Positive That We Need Our Full Gun Rights Restored

So you support every police killing then against citizens who may have 'provoked' them? I thought this forum was against unnecessary violence, but from what I'm getting you want a monopoly on it for yourselves.

They didn't "provoke" the guy, they physically attacked him. They started the event with their violence. Once it goes physical then...

And to the question re: police. Police INSTIGATED violence is way over the top and out of control, but if you strike a cop first, that has not physically harmed you, then expect to get beat.

There is violence in the world that is very necessary, or you die.
 
Have you seen the x-rays and verified they were of her after the incident in which she attacked this man?
have you seen the footage on them on the floor 'still attacking him' as was claimed when he kept hitting them after they were down? I do know a metal rod can crack a skull, and also I know that a slap to the face is hardly a serious attack designed to hurt anyone.

He was controlling himself fine until he was attacked.

I hope you are never violently attacked because you will be dead before you figure out "just how serious" your attacker is.
Those are women who are unhappy customers, not some thieves trying to rob you. And getting 'slapped' is not attacked. A slap has 0 long term consequences, probably wont even show up in the mirror. Mothers slap their children FFS. This guy bashed in their skulls and you guys think its appropriate retaliation.

+ rep

and yes, never take someone's word that they won't hit you if you let them up.
He could have simply taken 2 steps back after they were both on the floor and be safe. He didn't need to beat them until they were unconscious to be safe.
 
From my understanding, McDonalds asks of the employees who work their registers to verify if the dollars bills they are being given to be authentic. That's how this entire fracas started. This guy was just doing his job until these two harpies took offense to the policy and proceeded to escalate this into a full-blown bunkhouse brawl.
 
Not that this isn't awful, but to me it is a problem with our current system. A person's past crimes should not be brought up when considering his guilt on the current charge. Or during sentencing (California's draconian 3 strikes law).

The only thing draconian about the 3 strikes law is that they apply it to victimless offenses.

A violent criminal who repeatedly shows no sign of changing their behavior should be eliminated from society. Preferably by a bullet from one of their victims, but the purpose of a justice system is to serve justice. If you commit violent felonies three times, you should thank god you are still alive and that the victim or one of their family members didn't kill you already.
 
They didn't "provoke" the guy, they physically attacked him. They started the event with their violence. Once it goes physical then...

And to the question re: police. Police INSTIGATED violence is way over the top and out of control, but if you strike a cop first, that has not physically harmed you, then expect to get beat.

There is violence in the world that is very necessary, or you die.

So this was deserved and totally appropriate, right?
Police bodyslam 80-year-old woman in Columbus, OH

and this one too
84-year-old vet suffers broken neck after police takedown


so if you even brush a cop the wrong way, or are appeared as'aggressive' expect a lunch full of lead or tazers.
even if you are a women or child
 
Last edited:
have you seen the footage on them on the floor 'still attacking him' as was claimed when he kept hitting them after they were down? I do know a metal rod can crack a skull, and also I know that a slap to the face is hardly a serious attack designed to hurt anyone.


Those are women who are unhappy customers, not some thieves trying to rob you. And getting 'slapped' is not attacked. A slap has 0 long term consequences, probably wont even show up in the mirror. Mothers slap their children FFS. This guy bashed in their skulls and you guys think its appropriate retaliation.


He could have simply taken 2 steps back after they were both on the floor and be safe. He didn't need to beat them until they were unconscious to be safe.

Were you there? How can you pretend to know he would have been safe?
 
I found the soundtrack for this episode.

 
When the wheels truly do fall off this mess, those of you in large cities will have 48 hours or less to GTFO.

These people will go feral inside of three days, and bugshit insane after a week of no food, fuel, water or heat.
 
Last edited:
The only thing draconian about the 3 strikes law is that they apply it to victimless offenses.

A violent criminal who repeatedly shows no sign of changing their behavior should be eliminated from society. Preferably by a bullet from one of their victims, but the purpose of a justice system is to serve justice. If you commit violent felonies three times, you should thank god you are still alive and that the victim or one of their family members didn't kill you already.

Using a non violent crime as one of the strikes is the most draconian part of it. But you have already served your time for a past crime, the 3 strikes law sentences you for that crime all over again.
 
he crushed a girls skull while they were on the ground. You guys are supporting this?




her head was caved in for goodnes sakes.

Yes.
If you attack me I will be doing my very best to incapacitate you.
Permanently if possible, so you never ever do that shit again.

The attackers are responsibly for any injuries they incur.
 
Were you there? How can you pretend to know he would have been safe?

I guess you and a lot of people have trouble analyzing situations (note: please never become a cop or soldier!). What you are saying is any aggression or contact allows for an unlimited amount of retaliation. These are out of shape women, he could have literally ran circles around them.
 
you can't fake a "crushed skull," its not like a car accident where your 'back hurts' and you get a settlement. There are xrays.

Well, I didn't know you had personally seen the X-rays, Dr. Squarepusher. My mistake for not completely believing a quote from a father in a story on Glenn Beck's website.
 
Yes.
If you attack me I will be doing my very best to incapacitate you.
Permanently if possible, so you never ever do that shit again.

The attackers are responsibly for any injuries they incur.

a slap to the face by a women, you sir are a coward.
 
When the wheels truly do fall off this mess, those of you large cities will have 48 hours or less to GTFO.

These people will go feral inside of three days, and bugshit insane after a week of no food, fuel, water or heat.

The epicenter for all domestic unrest will be fast-food restaurants. LOL
 
Well, I didn't know you had personally seen the X-rays, Dr. Squarepusher. My mistake for not completely believing a quote from a father in a story on Glenn Beck's website.
Here's what I saw. A slap to the face, and a attack with a metal rod that wouldn't let up.
 
a slap to the face by a women, you sir are a coward.

But it wasn't even that. They escalated it even further by chasing him into the food prep area. That's like smacking a grizzly in the face, who initially retreats and then you follow him back into it's cave. You're going to provoke a fight or flight response.
 
When the wheels truly do fall off this mess, those of you large cities will have 48 hours or less to GTFO.

These people will go feral inside of three days, and bugshit insane after a week of no food, fuel, water or heat.

That's a fact, Jack.
 
Those are women who are unhappy customers, not some thieves trying to rob you. And getting 'slapped' is not attacked. A slap has 0 long term consequences, probably wont even show up in the mirror. Mothers slap their children FFS. This guy bashed in their skulls and you guys think its appropriate retaliation.

Uh yes, getting slapped is getting attacked. Don't downplay it because it is two black chicks doing it. If a white man had slapped a black woman McDonalds employee what would it be called, a "Violent racist hate crime."

Two of them coming over the counter and continuing the attack is an escalation of the attack.

Street violence happens so fast, suddenly a knife is out and your guts are on the floor.
 
I guess you and a lot of people have trouble analyzing situations (note: please never become a cop or soldier!). What you are saying is any aggression or contact allows for an unlimited amount of retaliation. These are out of shape women, he could have literally ran circles around them.

What I am saying is that they deserve whatever happened to them after they attacked him. No matter what it was he did in retaliation or what the end result was. They deserved it.
 
He had every right to defend himself, he felt threatened and felt he had to use some kind of weapon to defend himself, after all the two idiots did jump the counter just to attack him.
 
Back
Top