M mmazin Member Joined Jan 4, 2008 Messages 12 Jan 8, 2008 #1 If it comes down to them for 1st, which is better for Ron paul??
Dorfsmith Member Joined May 22, 2007 Messages 2,475 Jan 8, 2008 #2 mmazin said: If it comes down to them for 1st, which is better for Ron paul?? Click to expand... McCain will help split up the 1st place wins. Romney has Wyoming.
mmazin said: If it comes down to them for 1st, which is better for Ron paul?? Click to expand... McCain will help split up the 1st place wins. Romney has Wyoming.
ValidusCustodiae Member Joined Oct 4, 2007 Messages 1,258 Jan 8, 2008 #3 Romney because it keeps everybody else in and splits the neo con vote. We don't want to see huckabee or giuilani do well. Ideally, either Ron or Romney wins NH.
Romney because it keeps everybody else in and splits the neo con vote. We don't want to see huckabee or giuilani do well. Ideally, either Ron or Romney wins NH.
Drknows Member Joined Sep 28, 2007 Messages 1,977 Jan 8, 2008 #4 mmazin said: If it comes down to them for 1st, which is better for Ron paul?? Click to expand... Why are you the guy counting the final tally?
mmazin said: If it comes down to them for 1st, which is better for Ron paul?? Click to expand... Why are you the guy counting the final tally?
T tfelice Banned Joined Oct 1, 2007 Messages 638 Jan 8, 2008 #5 If Romney doesn't win NH and MI he's out of it.
M mmazin Member Joined Jan 4, 2008 Messages 12 Jan 8, 2008 #6 Drknows said: Why are you the guy counting the final tally? Click to expand... I have been reading alot of posts about shooting for 3rd, so I was just wondering which would be better for paul. Seems there is no clear consensus.
Drknows said: Why are you the guy counting the final tally? Click to expand... I have been reading alot of posts about shooting for 3rd, so I was just wondering which would be better for paul. Seems there is no clear consensus.