how does this in any way change anything??
This is nothing compared to the next McCain scandal that's coming soon....that he's not a war hero and deceived the Americans into thinking that he was one...see
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=112513
and http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1964129/posts
They also correctly predicted back in January that this female lobbyist scandal would happen
am I the only one that finds it absolutely gross beyond comprehension that anyone would consider sleeping with McCain? I have never seen him look anything less than disgusting physically. Quite a few people might not believe this story no matter who reports it based on his looks alone. ugh [shivers].
what the heck does this change though?? If RP isn't even running to win in TX?? There are ZERO ads challenging the voters there "to change the GOP race by voting for the only true conservative still standing"... Zero ads proclaiming that "every vote counts, and that they, as a state, have the opportunity to send the rest of the nation a message that conservatives will not support McCain, that conservatives will no longer support reckless spending etc."
Where did our 30million go? This "scandal" will do nothing save give Hucks another couple of points...
lol at NY Times endorsing McCain, knowing that they had an article ready to rip him to shreds less than a month later.
EVERYONE READ: Interesting Tidbit on this New York Times story that I think should get out
Drudge had headlined that they had obtained exclusive info from a source that said the New York Times had this story about McCain and a female lobbyist and it was going to be big and was probably gonna run in the next couple days. This was in January just a couple days before the New Hampshire Primary.
I specifically remembered this because it was so close to the NH primary and I was think how this could really benefit Ron Paul if some big negative story on McCain was to break. Well I waited lookin for it but the story never ran and I thought the NYT had killed it or Drudge's source was bogus and there was no story.....Until now
THIS MEANS THAT THE NEW YORK TIMES HAS BEEN PURPOSELY SITTING ON THIS STORY AND IS ONLY NOW RELEASING IT BECAUSE MCCAIN HAS EMERGED AS THE PROBABLE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE.
Can you imagine how different all of the primary elections might have turned out if this story had run when Drudge first got wind of it???
This is just another blatant example of the MSM, in this case the NYT, manipulating the whole political process to favor their chosen candidates. People need to start waking up to this!