Maxine Waters Calls For Attacks On White House Employees

Seems like this whole thing is building up to someone taking a shot at Trump. Then the next phase of the police state gets rolling.

If predictive programming is an actual thing… then there was a lot of that going on, in regard to what you just said. Kind of scary.
 
Last edited:
Crowder and I do not agree across the board, but watch how these DemocRATS act here. This was just yesterday and in Texas... fucking animals.

https://youtu.be/Of1Od0n_y34

They rely upon their pack to defend them. Too fat and weak to handle themselves otherwise. Regardless, he could have, with the help of his bodyguard, kicked the mob's collective pansy ass.
 
Last edited:
Its not cognitive dissonance. Is Sarah Sanders suing the restaurant owner??? No she isn't, and if she did I would side with the owner. You are commenting like things are the same when they are very different.

Wait, so your opinion of a person's action changes depending on whether there's a lawsuit about it or not?
 
One day we are going to regret the lowering of the discourse to this level. Once you get to a certain point, there's only going the mob. The pleasing mask that obscures the true nature of demotism is cracking.
 
Did Maxine also announce the time and place for the next Congressional baseball game?
 
Wait, so your opinion of a person's action changes depending on whether there's a lawsuit about it or not?
Yup, it goes from being a matter of opinion to being a question of government force, I hold the opinion that the restaurant shouldn't have done what they did and if I was a customer I would go elsewhere because of it but I believe government shouldn't force them to do the right thing.
 
Yup, it goes from being a matter of opinion to being a question of government force, I hold the opinion that the restaurant shouldn't have done what they did and if I was a customer I would go elsewhere because of it but I believe government shouldn't force them to do the right thing.

This.
 
Didnt Anwar Awlaki do this? Incite violence against Americans? They droned him and his kid - later killing his daughter too.

Context is everything. I never watched Anwar's youtubes, but if he was advocating that people resist american aggression than it's not incitement to violence, it's raising the Hue and Cry against a criminal.
 
Context is everything. I never watched Anwar's youtubes, but if he was advocating that people resist american aggression than it's not incitement to violence, it's raising the Hue and Cry against a criminal.

Obummer and associates claimed Anwar was inciting violence, and organizing/conspiring terrorism and killing of Americans. No evidence was provided, and nobody was held accountable for his son and daughter's deaths (innocent children, one being born in Colorado and a US citizen). To be fair, Trump had ordered the attack where Anwar's daughter was killed.

To be clear, I personally don't believe hate speech or inciting violence justifies a drone attack or assassination, but the obummer administration did.

To support the tangent of this discussion, "Dirty Wars" [Jeremy Scahill] was an excellent documentary, and goes into a fair amount of detail regarding the Awlaki assassination. If you haven't seen it, its definitely worth watching.
 
Yup, it goes from being a matter of opinion to being a question of government force, I hold the opinion that the restaurant shouldn't have done what they did and if I was a customer I would go elsewhere because of it but I believe government shouldn't force them to do the right thing.

That's not what I gathered from the post I replied to, though. I asked simply whether one's opinion of a situation changes depending on whether a lawsuit is filed over the situation. That is how I read the post I quoted. Madison320's point about considering monetary motivation is noted as a valid point.

Either way, I see a lot of easily emotionally manipulated people being dragged into a conflict against each other yet again. Welcome back to 1860.

Here's the thing. One little secret of governance that is often used but rarely disclosed is to create situations that turn into lawsuits so that judges can effectively change standing legislation/law without legislators having to do it and risk the publicity of votes. Just blame it on the judges instead.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top