- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 64,254
"Only Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), a fervent Trump loyalist, voted against it."
Massie, Khanna demand full release of Epstein files, will try to force House vote Tuesday
- Thread starter Occam's Banana
- Start date
Slave Mentality
Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 2,072
Reports of maybe 1,000 documented victims. All lies according to pedo protectors. Don’t bring Christ into your nonsense. Normal people are repulsed by this shit. Release the fucking files.
Voluntarist
Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2011
- Messages
- 4,006
Senate approves Epstein files bill, sending it to Trump’s desk
... or at least all they want to turn over
... or at least all they want to turn over
Ya but Id guess they dont get the good stuff from fbi
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,894
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,894
“National Security” Blocks the Jeffrey Epstein Files — Here’s What It Really Means
https://theallenanalysis.substack.com/p/national-security-blocks-the-jeffrey
{Brian Allen | 17 November 2025}
For years, survivors of one of the largest child-sex trafficking rings in U.S. history have demanded the full truth. The names. The flight logs. The client lists. The cover-ups.
Now, as a critical vote in the House approaches, one word may derail the transparency they have been fighting for: national security.
What the Stakes Are
In July 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) issued a memorandum that shocked many: they stated they had no credible evidence to support new charges against un-indicted co-conspirators in the Epstein network and that no “client list” existed.
At the same time, survivors claim they provided detailed information to the FBI and SDNY: nearly fifty abuse survivors identified at least 20 alleged co-conspirators to law enforcement, according to a letter from Jamie Raskin to Attorney General Pam Bondi.
In short: an investigation was ongoing, victims cooperated, but then the department declined to pursue it further and withheld the records.
What’s New — The “National Security” Shield
As the House prepares to take a vote on a bill demanding the release of all Epstein-related federal documents, the question is: what will be released? Because one major piece has already emerged: the public will not see everything.
As investigative reporter Ken Klippenstein wrote:
In other words: the door remains open for the same institutions to claim that large swaths of the files cannot be made public because they are part of an “ongoing investigation,” concern national security, or involve sensitive intelligence.
Why This Strategy Matters
Here are the mechanics:
Simply put: the system is primed to say “We have nothing to hide,” while deploying legal and procedural barriers to ensure much remains hidden.
- If a case is declared “active investigation,” the DOJ can refuse FOIA requests, deny full disclosure, and claim executive privilege or national-security guardrails.
- Survivors, legal advocates, and Congressional overseers fear this is being used as a stalling tactic to prevent full disclosure of Epstein’s network, including political, financial, and intelligence angles that may implicate powerful people.
- Legislative and prosecutorial efforts appear to have shifted: the investigation into co-conspirators was reportedly halted in January 2025, files were moved from the Southern District of New York to DOJ headquarters in D.C., and career prosecutors were sidelined.
- Meanwhile, public messaging shifted: the files were once promised, then their existence was denied or minimized, and the presidency of Donald Trump reversed its own public line on release.
What We Know Is Still Hidden
Key items still withheld from public or un-redacted view:
These gaps are not small. They go to the heart of what survivors, congressional investigators, and the public demand: Who enabled Epstein? Who benefited? Who was covered up?
- Hard drives and digital evidence were seized in the 2019 Manhattan raid (Epstein’s mansion).
- Flight logs, internal notes, email threads, and connections to uncharged individuals.
- Grand-jury transcripts and sealed court materials.
- Transparent justification for why the earlier investigation into co-conspirators was terminated.
Bottom Line: Here’s What to Watch
Why This Still Matters
- The upcoming House vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) or related discharge petition efforts may force a vote but will not guarantee full disclosure due to the “national security” carve-out.
- Attorney General Bondi’s next public comments (or lack thereof) will signal whether DOJ intends to comply or resist federal oversight.
- Survivors are preparing to amplify pressure: more letters, more testimony, possibly more lawsuits.
- If large sections of the files remain redacted or withheld, the public may face a truncated version of “transparency,” one that protects many of the powerful rather than exposes them.
This is not just a story about Epstein. It is a stress test of our system of accountability.
When an investigation touches the rich and powerful, when victims testify, when files are seized, then swept into secrecy, the question becomes: who covers for whom?
When the government promises release and later cites “national security” to block disclosure, the question becomes: who controls what we can see?
And when a president says “we have nothing to hide,” while his Justice Department claims otherwise behind closed doors, the question becomes: who still holds the truth?
Survivors kept their end of the bargain: they gave testimony, they hung on hope, and they pressed for justice.
Now, the rest of us must watch: will the institutions that failed those survivors now protect the system further, or will they let the sunlight in?
References & Source Documents
1. ABC News: Timeline of Trump Administration responses to Epstein files release
ABC News. “Timeline of the Trump administration’s responses to the Epstein files release saga.”
Timeline: Trump administration responses in Epstein files release saga
The Trump Administration has come under fire for months over its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.abcnews.go.com
2. U.S. House Judiciary: Jamie Raskin letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi
U.S. House Judiciary Committee (Democratic Members).
“Ranking Member Raskin Releases New Information on Trump DOJ’s Decision to Kill Investigation Into Epstein’s Co-Conspirators.”
Ranking Member Raskin Releases New Information on Trump DOJ’s Decision to Kill Investigation Into Epstein’s Co-Conspirators and Demands Answers from AG Bondi
Washington, D.C. (November 4, 2025)—Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi demanding to know why the Trump Administration abruptly terminated a criminal investigation into the co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein and...democrats-judiciary.house.gov
3. CBS News: Investigation into Epstein co-conspirators halted
CBS News.
“House Democrats say Trump DOJ ended investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators.”
House Democrats press DOJ for details on Epstein co-conspirators probe that was "inexplicably killed"
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein provided the Justice Department with "precise and detailed" information about 20 alleged co-conspirators, House Democrats say.www.cbsnews.com
4. Ken Klippenstein: National Security Loophole & Epstein Files
Klippenstein, Ken.
“‘National Security’ Blocks Epstein Files Release.”
“National Security” Blocks Epstein Files Release
The one word preventing transparencywww.kenklippenstein.com
5. Business Insider: DOJ secrecy around seized Epstein hard drives & records
Business Insider.
“Trump’s DOJ kept Epstein records secret — what may be released now.”
These are the real 'Epstein files' the government has yet to release
The Trump administration says it won't release the "Epstein files" anymore. The still-secret docs could help answer mysteries about the financier.www.businessinsider.com
6. The Atlantic: How Trump’s allies moved to suppress Epstein files
The Atlantic.
“Trump and His Allies Are Desperate to Stop the Epstein Files.”
Trump’s Epstein-Files Punt
The president’s about-face shows how he’s a terrible ally—but he may be hurting himself too.www.theatlantic.com
7. The Washington Post: Court ruling blocking grand jury transcript release
The Washington Post.
“New York judge denies release of Epstein-related grand jury transcript.”
8. Proposed Legislation: Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405)
Wikipedia summary (commonly cited reference point).
Epstein Files Transparency Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
9. Supplemental Context, DOJ memo claiming no ‘credible evidence’ to pursue co-conspirators
(Referenced in multiple press briefings and congressional summaries; primary memo not released publicly.)
See ABC News reporting:
Timeline: Trump administration responses in Epstein files release saga
The Trump Administration has come under fire for months over its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1990810473835442409
Speaker Mike Johnson claims the Epstein files can’t be released unredacted because they contain intelligence-agency material that falls under national security.
He says it’s dangerous to force the DOJ to declassify documents they didn’t create, especially when they involve other agencies like the CIA or NSA.
Johnson warns that releasing the Epstein files unredacted would put national security at risk.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,894
https://x.com/allenanalysis/status/1990868789823512696
Massie just dropped the hammer on Mike Johnson:
“He’s trying to say the rich, powerful men who flew to Epstein Island are the victims now. The only way a ‘Christian man’ can stand up there and sell a lie like that is if he’s already decided in his head that protecting them is somehow okay.”
Massie isn’t speaking in code anymore, he’s calling out a moral cover-up in real time.
Massie just dropped the hammer on Mike Johnson:
“He’s trying to say the rich, powerful men who flew to Epstein Island are the victims now. The only way a ‘Christian man’ can stand up there and sell a lie like that is if he’s already decided in his head that protecting them is somehow okay.”
Massie isn’t speaking in code anymore, he’s calling out a moral cover-up in real time.
TheTexan
Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 28,158
unknown
Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 13,653
Unfortunately, we'll get the pre-approved files.
The real incriminating evidence is in Izrael.
Danke
Top Rated Influencer
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 44,637
It’s Time to Name the “Wall Street Financiers” in the Epstein Files
An Open Letter to Congressman James Comer, Chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee ~ September 2, 2025 ~ Dear Chairman Comer: On
wallstreetonparade.com
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,894
Similar threads
