Mark Larsen Chooses Ron Paul On Air

[UK4Paul]

The other digg thread had over 700 diggs, now the new one that is not going to be censored because Ron Paul's name is not in the title, has over 730 diggs! Keep it up guys and gals.

Precisely. The lesson is... never use the name Ron Paul directly in the Digg title or main description.

I watched the other thread, which was on the front page, suddenly disappear from the listings.

 

[NoPants]

Precisely. The lesson is... never use the name Ron Paul directly in the Digg title or main description.

I watched the other thread, which was on the front page, suddenly disappear from the listings.

Same here. I watched the first one go up... and go away.

 

[JeffersonThomas]

Blimp...I just listened to this & I hope there were a bunch of people in florida who heard it!

 

[Patrick Henry]

Mark Larsen interviews Mitt Romney and then declares support for Ron Paul. Very entertaining. Check it out here -- http://youtube.com/watch?v=6lAFfLy05_Y

Digg it -- http://anonym.to/?http://digg.com/politics/Interview_with_Romney_reporter_decides_who_to_vote_for

Then send Mark Larsen some love from the Revolution here -- http://www.themorningmagazine.com/contact.html


Bump it if you like it. -- www.WeLoveFreedom.com

Placemark

 

[Thumper]

Wow...he really went off. That was SOOOO cool. He called him an "A-hole" and an "elitist screwball". It was great!!

 

[Knightskye]

"Anyone who wants to get rid of the CIA and the FBI deserves to be laughed at."

Laugh it up, granola boy.

 

[NoPants]

He laughed himself out of at least one vote.

 

[jaumen]

loved that.

As for digg, I do not believe that the guys running digg are censoring anything, the problem is that there is a segment of users who are burying Ron Paul related stories... Ron Paul's name being in the title makes it considerably easier for them to find and bury them.

 

[NoPants]

loved that.

As for digg, I do not believe that the guys running digg are censoring anything, the problem is that there is a segment of users who are burying Ron Paul related stories... Ron Paul's name being in the title makes it considerably easier for them to find and bury them.

Might be right, keep digging anyway.

 

[Anna Karenina]

This Digg problem started the day that Digg "partnered" with cbs.com.

I say we invent a code name for RP to put in Digg articles so it can get past the filters but we can still do a search to check out and Digg RP stories.

 

[btwilli1]

The bury's wouldn't keep it off the front page. Especially with 100 diggs in an hour.

 

[Rhys]

"Texas Congressman"?

 

[Nyte]

Glorious!

 

[cyrax]

w00t
Loved it.

 

[damoncrowe]

Wow!

 

[CaptBookbag]

doogan!

 

[FreedomPlz]

This is an ABSOLUTELY excellent piece of media for us!

 

[dannno]

Has anybody tried creating an article with the name Paul Ron in it instead?

 

[aperetti]

Digg's voting algorithm gives users more pull if they have a broader base of votes. Other words, if you keep only digging Ron Paul articles it continues to mean less.

Lesson Learned?

DON'T JUST DIG RON PAUL ARTICLES, K? STOP BLAMING THE "ESTABLISHMENT". WHATEVER THE FUCK THAT MEANS.

 

[emeriste]

This Digg problem started the day that Digg "partnered" with cbs.com.

I say we invent a code name for RP to put in Digg articles so it can get past the filters but we can still do a search to check out and Digg RP stories.

Maybe we should start referring to Ron Paul as "Kevin Rose"....