ClaytonB Member Joined Oct 30, 2011 Messages 10,246 Apr 29, 2022 #21 I hope Washington State sent a copy of the memo to Cheech & Chong...
cjm Member Joined Jan 29, 2010 Messages 2,956 Apr 29, 2022 #22 Anti Federalist said: Lawmakers strike the word ‘marijuana’ from all state laws, calling term racist Click to expand... As long as they keep using "person" instead of "man" or "woman," I'm ok with these types of edits. They can have their woke acts.
Anti Federalist said: Lawmakers strike the word ‘marijuana’ from all state laws, calling term racist Click to expand... As long as they keep using "person" instead of "man" or "woman," I'm ok with these types of edits. They can have their woke acts.
Occam's Banana Moderator Staff member Joined Nov 5, 2010 Messages 39,968 Apr 29, 2022 #23 Ender said: I'm not arguing any of that [...] Click to expand... I didn't think you were. I was just using your post as a springboard for mine. (I should have made clear that the "general" you was implied by the question in my first paragraph, not you in particular.)
Ender said: I'm not arguing any of that [...] Click to expand... I didn't think you were. I was just using your post as a springboard for mine. (I should have made clear that the "general" you was implied by the question in my first paragraph, not you in particular.)
Brian4Liberty Moderator Staff member Joined Jul 13, 2007 Messages 63,479 Apr 29, 2022 #24 cjm said: As long as they keep using "person" instead of "man" or "woman," I'm ok with these types of edits. They can have their woke acts. Click to expand... Good point. Using the term "Mary Jane" is sexist and misogynistic.
cjm said: As long as they keep using "person" instead of "man" or "woman," I'm ok with these types of edits. They can have their woke acts. Click to expand... Good point. Using the term "Mary Jane" is sexist and misogynistic.
Ender Member Joined Dec 3, 2007 Messages 12,527 May 3, 2022 #25 Occam's Banana said: I didn't think you were. I was just using your post as a springboard for mine. (I should have made clear that the "general" you was implied by the question in my first paragraph, not you in particular.) Click to expand...
Occam's Banana said: I didn't think you were. I was just using your post as a springboard for mine. (I should have made clear that the "general" you was implied by the question in my first paragraph, not you in particular.) Click to expand...