Man Rousted at Gunpoint After License Plate Scanner Misreads Plate

Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
10,554
Widespread use of automatic license plate scanner is legal in 49 states and I don't know of any legislative efforts to stop them in those states. The federal government was going to connect all of the local and state networks together with it's own network. However, there was some push back from that idea and the feds claim that will no go through with it...

2 paragraphs were removed from the story.

Man Rousted at Gunpoint After License Plate Scanner Misreads Plate
J.D. Tuccille|Apr. 28, 2014 10:03 am
http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/28/man-rousted-at-gunpoint-after-license-pl

One of the downsides of all of the new gee-whiz identification technology law enforcement is adopting (usually with hefty federal subsidies) is that it never works quite as well as advertised. The FBI touts facial recognition software as the bad guy-tagging tool of the future, but you have to dig through documents to discover that the feds consider a false positive rate of 20 percent to be perfectly acceptable.

We don't really know what the false positive rate for license plate scanners is, but we do know it has one. At least, Mark Molner, a Prairie Village, Kansas, attorney knows it, because a scanner misread his BMW's license plate for that of a stolen Oldsmobile plate, and the next thing he knew, cops with guns in hand had him surrounded and wanted to know his business.

Writes Jay Senter at the Prairie Village Post:

Mark Molner, whose law office is just north of the intersection of 75th Street and State Line Road, was driving back from a sonographer’s appointment with his wife around 5:15 p.m. Monday when a Prairie Village police car pulled up behind him.

"As there were tons of cars around me, I was not certain who they were pulling over, but as I had been at the light some time, I did not think that I had had the opportunity to do anything to interest the officers, so when traffic permitted, I pulled forward with it, slowly," Molner said. "At that time, the cruiser darted in front of me and attempted to pin me by parking diagonally across both lanes of traffic, and the motorcycle took up a place directly behind me."

As one of the officers approached Molner's car, Molner noticed that he had his gun out.

"He did not point it at me, but it was definitely out of the holster," he said. "I am guessing that he saw the shock and horror on my face, and realized that I was unlikely to make (more of) a scene."

After a few moments of conferring with the other officer on the scene, the policeman returned to Molner's window and told him that a license plate scanner mounted on his police unit had thrown off an alert that Molner was in a stolen vehicle. As it turned out, though, the license scanner mounted on the car had misread a "7" on Molner's license plate as a "2." The alert the officer received was related to a stolen Oldsmobile. Molner was driving a black BMW. Molner's wife, who is four months pregnant, watched the incident unfolding from her car in the parking lot of Molner's office.


Which is another downside of all of the new gee-whiz identification technology law enforcement is adopting. It inevitably means more encounters between police and the public. Given law enforcement's increasingly militarized approach to the world, that usually involves an inclination to poke a boot or a bullet into somebody and then ask questions later.
 
Here is the original story. I noticed that at least 1 of the Reason.com commentors actually supported the US of this evil tech against the people of the US. I didn't notice any comments like that on the small town newspaper.

Error from license plate scanner leads to police stop that startles PV-based attorney
Posted by Jay Senter · April 16, 2014 8:06 am
http://pvpost.com/2014/04/16/error-...ce-stop-that-startles-pv-based-attorney-26688

Police_Patrol_Unit.jpg

The Prairie Village police department’s Directed Patrol Unit, which has license plate scanners mounted on it, has been in service for more than a year now.
 
One of the downsides of all of the new gee-whiz identification technology law enforcement is adopting (usually with hefty federal subsidies) is that it never works quite as well as advertised. The FBI touts facial recognition software as the bad guy-tagging tool of the future, but you have to dig through documents to discover that the feds consider a false positive rate of 20 percent to be perfectly acceptable.

Which is another downside of all of the new gee-whiz identification technology law enforcement is adopting. It inevitably means more encounters between police and the public. Given law enforcement's increasingly militarized approach to the world, that usually involves an inclination to poke a boot or a bullet into somebody and then ask questions later.


I'm sure the Feds would consider the boots and bullets to be just as "perfectly acceptable" as the 20% false positive rate.

After all, the terror helps keep the Mundanes in line. And after all, it's really for their own good anyway.


:(
 
I'm sure the Feds would consider the boots and bullets to be just as "perfectly acceptable" as the 20% false positive rate.

After all, the terror helps keep the Mundanes in line. And after all, it's really for their own good anyway.


:(

"If it saves just ONE life, it's ALL worth it."
 
I bet these things could be foiled pretty easy....

I noticed on my own plates, that there is a subtle ribbon, it is in the middle of the plate and runs in a twist like a double helix.
you have to look at the plate on an angle to see it.

I bet if we got really creative, we could figure out how to make it read.

dick Tracy, gotham city. batmobile.

I am SURE that officer friendly would see the humor in this.
 
"If it saves just ONE life, it's ALL worth it."


More like, "if we have to kill 5,000 to to get the one we want, it's all worth it."

The notion of "acceptable losses" as judged by one at the expense of others is one of the most profoundly criminal concepts to have ever issued from the devil's butt.
 
Back
Top