Man Plows Vehicle Into Holiday Parade - 11 Adults, 12 Children Hospitalized, 1 Dead

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1463299028448329742


1sux6qA.jpg


PakKHCU.jpg
 
The unhinged loonies are coming out to play:

ta1Iweu.png


And a few brief things while I'm at it:

(1) I'm no fan of dealing with criminals (even violent ones) by tossing them into state-run rape-cages, but it's pretty goddam obvious that if Brooks had been in jail he wouldn't have been able to injure and kill all those people, you utter fucking waste of brain matter.

(2) To hell with "fix[ing] this person" (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean) ...

"There is a point in the history of society when it becomes so pathologically soft and tender that among other things it sides even with those who harm it, criminals, and does this quite seriously and honestly." -- Friedrich Nietzsche (Beyond Good and Evil, Section V Aphorism 201)​

(3) I will leave it as an exercise for the reader to contemplate the degree of spiteful, life-hating, bat-shit insanity required in order to blame this incident on "societal reliance on climate destroying death machines" rather than on the murderously vicious asshole who plowed the car he was driving through a crowd of people.
 
Last edited:
And here we have a statement from 2007 by the D.A. that let out Brooks on a $1000 bail after he beat and ran over his baby-momma.

“Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into [a] treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody?” he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in 2007. “You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”
Click to expand...

https://www.floppingaces.net/2021/1...on-well-worth-the-lives-of-6-innocent-people/

How about 6 "someones" Mr. DA?
 
phill4paul said:
How long before GoFundMe allows Marxists to set up a page for him? Will Kamala donate?
Click to expand...

There actually was a GoFundMe started for him, but they took it down.

I guess there is a limit to their hypocrisy, after all - at least in particular highly-publicized cases like this one.

(They had just issued a statement after the Rittenhouse verdict justifying their refusal to allow any projects in support of him, on the basis that he had been charged with a violent crime - which doesn't explain why they previously allowed projects to raise bail on behalf of rioters charged with violent crimes.)
 
Occam's Banana said:
There actually was a GoFundMe started for him, but they took it down.

I guess there is a limit to their hypocrisy, after all - at least in particular highly-publicized cases like this one.

(They had just issued a statement after the Rittenhouse verdict justifying their refusal to allow any projects in support of him, on the basis that he had been charged with a violent crime - which doesn't explain why they previously allowed projects to raise bail for rioters charged with violent crimes.)
Click to expand...

"Destruction of private property is not violence. It does not cause physical harm to a person. Private property is a concept steeped in white supremacy."

I have seen that explaination used far too often.
 
RJB said:
"Destruction of private property is not violence. It does not cause physical harm to a person. Private property is a concept steeped in white supremacy."

I have seen that explaination used far too often.
Click to expand...

College professors are quite fond of that argument. A good reminder that dialogue with these people is often pointless. One cannot form a healthy civilization alongside them.
 
RJB said:
"Destruction of private property is not violence. It does not cause physical harm to a person. Private property is a concept steeped in white supremacy."

I have seen that explaination used far too often.
Click to expand...

BSWPaulsen said:
College professors are quite fond of that argument. A good reminder that dialogue with these people is often pointless. One cannot form a healthy civilization alongside them.
Click to expand...

Just ask them if they support slavery.

They will say "no"

Then you say, ok, what do slaveowners do? Don't they steal the labor from their slaves? So what's the difference between a thief and a slave owner, anyway?
 
dannno said:
Just ask them if they support slavery.

They will say "no"

Then you say, ok, what do slaveowners do? Don't they steal the labor from their slaves? So what's the difference between a thief and a slave owner, anyway?
Click to expand...

I have argued with Marxist professors. Hell, I have one this semester that I have gone up against repeatedly due to every class being about how amazing Critical Race Theory is in his eyes. I keep writing papers that systematically drag his nonsense through the mud on philosophical, logical, and historical grounds. Does it matter? No. Logical consistency has nothing to do with their worldview. It is all about power, and they will use any logical fallacy they can get their hands on to promote their ideology's social dominance.

When you are having a discussion with a Marxist, it is not an honest debate. In fact, it is not even a debate. You cannot "win", because you are the only one that cares about the truth. People need to get used to the fact that what they are dealing with are individuals promulgating their beliefs for perceived personal gain regardless of the details. They are completely devoid of honor or integrity and wholly embody Nietzsche's archetypal "letzter mensch".
 
RJB said:
"Destruction of private property is not violence. It does not cause physical harm to a person. Private property is a concept steeped in white supremacy."

I have seen that explaination used far too often.
Click to expand...

And you disagree comrade? Do you side with white supremacist capitalist pigs? Seems that re-education camp and some struggle sessions will be in your future. Your confession will be awaiting your signature at the camp.
 
Brian4Liberty said:
And you disagree comrade? Do you side with white supremacist capitalist pigs? Seems that re-education camp and some struggle sessions will be in your future. Your confession will be awaiting your signature at the camp.
Click to expand...

I know a lot of people who aren't white who have a desire to protect what they have earned. All this boils down to is Marxism. Race is just one of the many underhanded paths they use.
 
RJB said:
"Destruction of private property is not violence. It does not cause physical harm to a person. Private property is a concept steeped in white supremacy."

I have seen that explaination used far too often.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't know. I would imagine a person in their own home breaking shit and screaming and throwing things would be considered violent by many. Does assault need to be involved for something to be violent?
 
RJB said:
I know a lot of people who aren't white who have a desire to protect what they have earned. All this boils down to is Marxism. Race is just one of the many underhanded paths they use.
Click to expand...

The non-white capitalists will have to sign a confession stating that they are really white supremacists on the inside, and therefore are thought criminals.

White capitalists will have to sign a white guilt confession, along with a myriad of other confessions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Anti Federalist
FL - 2 arrested after suspects drove car into crowd at Christmas parade
Replies
4
Views
559
jfa264
J
John F Kennedy III
12 Factors That Are Turning The Streets Of America Into A Living Hell
Replies
1
Views
540
DamianTV
DamianTV
Back
Top