Making Palestine Go Away

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,570
Featured Articles
by Philip Giraldi
May 24, 2025


It has been another exciting week in a world at war where the word “diplomacy” has no meaning and would probably be defined by America’s head of Homeland Security Kristi Noem as a doctrine in which you shoot someone first before he or she can shoot you. In my article last week I discussed the reports that there has been a serious rift between President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, exemplified by Trump’s unwillingness to talk to the Israeli leader followed by his failure to visit Israel on his recent Middle East trip. Sources attributed the break to Trump’s perception that he was being “manipulated” by the Israeli, which was completely plausible though something that should have been recognized and warned against by Trump’s foreign policy advisers when he first ascended to the presidency in 2017. Israel always manipulates opinion on the United States through its lobby’s control of the media and corruption of the politicians.

I opined that the reports of the disenchantment with “America’s best friend” were credible possibly linked to spying involving National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, though I also observed that many of my contacts were skeptical, warning that the whole thing might be a set-up possibly engineered by Trump’s Zionist roving negotiator Steve Witkoff and specifically designed to benefit Israel. That means that the US was feigning a “breakup” with Netanyahu to enable it to reach an agreement with all the leading Arab countries of the Middle East in order to confirm Israel’s security while Netanyahu is completely wiping the Palestinians off the face of the earth. Trump has in fact said that his policies and the Mideast trip were “very good for Israel.”

In a follow up to my article I advised during an interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano that it pays to be skeptical as Trump has done absolutely nothing to change Israel’s behavior, quite the contrary, even though he had an opportunity to support Palestinian statehood in the context of UN membership and also to demand an end to the genocide taking place in Gaza. The truth behind whether there was in fact a serious rupture in the personal relationship of the two leaders should be measured in light of the presence or absence of consequences when Israel pursues policies damaging to US interests.

Indeed, Netanyahu has personally confirmed that all is well with the United States. He said at a press conference last Wednesday that President Trump had assured him that the US and his administration were completely committed to Israel despite the series of media reports that have said there’s a problem between the two leaders. “Let me give you some details that perhaps haven’t been made public. A few days ago — I think around 10 days ago, maybe a little more — I spoke on the phone with President Trump. And he said to me, literally: ‘Bibi, I want you to know — I have absolute commitment to you. I have absolute commitment to the State of Israel.’”

Netanyahu also spoke with Vice President JD Vance, who, along with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, had also avoided a visit to Israel. “[Vance] said to me… ‘Listen, don’t pay attention to all these fake news spins about this rupture between us… He said: It’s all spin. This isn’t the truth, you know it’s not true, and I’m telling you, from our side, it’s not true.” Netanyahu also said that Israel wants to carry out “Trump’s plan” for Gaza to include the permanent removal of the Palestinian population to create a US managed seafront resort over the ruins of the strip. Per Netanyahu, the Israelis have now included the creation of “Trump Gaza” as one of the redline conditions to permit an end of the war against Hamas.

The Israeli and Middle Eastern media have been reporting extensively and critically on the genocide and the various players involved in dealing with the Netanyahu agenda. A recent piece discussed the 29 mostly European Union (EU) countries led by the UK, France and Canada that have now called on Israel to moderate its behavior or face both sanctions and a suspension of the EU Israel trade arrangements, which greatly benefit the Jewish state. The EU declared that Israel’s announcement of letting some aid in was “wholly inadequate. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response” the leaders’ statement said. Netanyahu responded to the threat by declaring absurdly that “You’re on the wrong side of humanity and you’re on the wrong side of history.” But as the saying goes, unfortunately, talk is cheap, either from Netanyahu or from Israel’s newly minted critics. Diplomatic announcements and threatened sanctions mean always dancing around the awful truth. Israel is committing some of the worst war crimes humanity has ever witnessed and the Europeans and the Americans give every impression that they will certainly back off, deferring to Israel and persisting in doing absolutely nothing that will bring the suffering to an end.

The European gesture in particular is an attempt to make up somewhat for its support for 19 months of genocide. The completely contemptible Prime Minister of the UK Keir Starmer, confronted by a British public that has swung strongly anti-Israeli, has made a big show about taking action against Israel and the Israelis cooperated with him by playing their part, expressing outrage over the temerity of anyone telling them how to deal with their neighbors. Indeed, there was some corroboration from informed Israeli sources that the threats and responses from the two sides were little more than a bit of Kabuki. A senior Israeli official even explained to the media why European leaders have bothered to shift positions after 19 months of silence about the murderous Gaza genocide, to instead feign instant outrage. It was all coordinated with Israel in advance. He said that “The past 24 hours were all part of a planned ambush we knew about. This was a coordinated sequence of moves ahead of the EU meeting in Brussels – and thanks to joint efforts by our ambassadors and the foreign minister, we managed to moderate the outcome.”

The current outrage is as orchestrated as was the earlier silence. Israel’s extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich explained why Israel would be maintaining a balancing act between outright killing all the Palestinian and keeping western support by allowing absolutely minimum food to enter Gaza: “We need our friends in the world to continue to provide us with an international umbrella of protection against the Security Council and the Hague Tribunal, and for us to continue to fight, God willing, until victory.” He also has said that his plan for the West Bank and Gaza includes giving the Palestinians the choice between subjugation, emigration, and death. Smotrich has repeatedly advocated for lethal force to be used against Palestinian children lest they grow up to be terrorists. On Wednesday the Israeli army doubled down on that message and to show how little it cares to coddle meddling foreigners when it fired on 31 European diplomats representing 29 countries who were visiting the Palestinian settlement Jenin on the West Bank in what was presumed to be in 100% Palestinian administered territory.

The fact is that no one in the European and American governments really cares about the Palestinians or their extermination. The only concern by the rulers is how their posturing looks to the rest of the world and to the voters in their own countries. Israel lies so enthusiastically in making its case and providing false evidence to back up its behavior that there is a tendency to be suspicious of anything it does. Last week’s assassination of two Israeli embassy staff members in Washington DC by a man who just happened to yell “Free Palestine!” was good news for the Jewish state in that it creates sympathy for a country that has featured as bad news for well over a year. It is already being whispered in intelligence circles that it was a “false flag” attack contrived by Mossad to create a favorable news cycle as Israel secretly cranks up for an imminent attack on Iran. Iran phobia features regularly in the Israeli media to include a recent Israeli claim that Iran is hiding its nuclear enrichment facilities, which is true but designed the keep the Israelis from blowing them up. The “favorable news cycle” has included Jewish Congressman Randy Fine of Florida calling for the use of nuclear weapons to destroy Gaza and kill its remaining inhabitants just like “Japan at the end of World War 2.”

And to make sure Iran gets to feel the sharp point of the sword, presidential emissary Witkoff has now declared that the nuclear monitoring arrangement being negotiated with Iran must include zero enrichment of uranium, something that was not on the table when the talks started, so they will go nowhere guaranteed. Per Witkoff “We cannot allow even one percent of an enrichment capability. Enrichment enables weaponization.” Where did that demand come from? From a secretly nuclear armed Israel by way of treasonous Israel Firster Senators Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton, no doubt. And if one follows that line of thinking, one can assume that Donald Trump is also on board, standing in line to pull out Netanyahu’s chair and bowing to him and then raising his mighty clenched fist before sending in the Yanks to finish the destruction of Persia. And if Iran responds effectively with force, Israel also has around 200 nukes that it will no doubt not hesitate to use as part of its “Samson Option” war plan. And Trump will undoubtedly say something like “Hey, what a big beautiful explosion! Nothing wrong with that! We used similar weapons to end the First World War!”




Reprinted with permission from Unz Review.
 
Oh no not Palestine the random territory invented by the British whatever will we do without Palestine it has such a rich cultural history omg

Good riddance I say bye!
 
Oh no not Palestine the random territory invented by the British whatever will we do without Palestine it has such a rich cultural history omg

Good riddance I say bye!

I think it's less about the nation State and more about the fact that the Semitic Palestinians have a genetic lineage to the region which can be traced back thousands of years.

Whereas the foreign occupiers have an Eastern European ancestry.

That aside, the outcry is regarding the genocide and ethnic cleaning, ironically by a group of people who claim to have been victims of the same a few decades earlier.


 
Last edited:
I think it's less about the nation State and more about the fact that the Semitic Palestinians have a genetic lineage to the region which can be traced back thousands of years.

Nah they're just Syrian and Lebanese mutts.

If they had a distinct identity they wouldn't have needed the British to give them one.

They are Syrian much more than they are "Palestinian".
That aside, the outcry is regarding the genocide and ethnic cleaning, ironically by a group of people who claim to have been victims of the same a few decades earlier.

They pretty much did it to themselves by constantly attacking Israel. It doesn't make Israel right but it sure as shit doesn't make the "Palestinians" right either.

Israelis and "Palestinians" are both garbage people. The only difference is that Israel is stronger than they are.

I don't see how anybody could take the side of the "Palestinians" or the Israelis. They both suck.
 
Nah they're just Syrian and Lebanese mutts.

If they had a distinct identity they wouldn't have needed the British to give them one.

They are Syrian much more than they are "Palestinian".


They pretty much did it to themselves by constantly attacking Israel. It doesn't make Israel right but it sure as shit doesn't make the "Palestinians" right either.

Israelis and "Palestinians" are both garbage people. The only difference is that Israel is stronger than they are.

I don't see how anybody could take the side of the "Palestinians" or the Israelis. They both suck.

You should be putting "Israel" in quotation marks, and Palestine without.

Palestine has been a placename since the 5th century B.C. It was used with regularity all throughout history

On the other hand, the Kingdom of Israel ended 3,000 years ago, and except for a brief time according to the Bible
where the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea were united, the Israelites were distinct from the Judeans (Jews). They warred against one another.
By the time the Romans got to the scene, the split had already been centuries old. Judea from which we get the term Jews was ruled by Edomites, also called Idumeans, and the Romans allowed that group to have some local control, but they ruined it, as you should be aware.
They were heavily influenced by the Babylonians after they were removed from Jerusalem also, and this Babylonian influence stuck with them.

The term Israel was for a man, Jacob, and the Bible says his descendants would form many nations, certainly not just the Judeans.
The Israelites spread all over the known world, into Asia and Europe and Africa. This is why they were called the Lost 10 Tribes.
Virtually all of them were pagans, then Christians, and some Muslims, not "Jews" by religion. Jacob/Israel had 13 children, with 4 different wives. The promises of God were not only to the descendants of Judah, who was only 1 of his children. Judah married a Caananite (Gen 28:2).which further makes that contention of modern Zionism ludicrous.

History is interesting but it needs to be provided by real sources, not politically-motivated spinners. Anyway, you may call them what you wish, but in fact, there are many Europeans which have ancient Israelite blood in them, perhaps even you. So, it's not right to call them all "garbage", but rather, we should seek not to be swain by falsehoods, like the pretensions of the modern Zionist ideology. When "Israel" was granted its place, it was hoped that the so-called Jews would live better with their neighbors, but it didn't happen. The Palestine that peacefully existed for centuries was destroyed by them. Every f'n day...because it was inhabited by Christians and Muslims, and the Zionist Jews are an incestual group of supremacist megalomaniacs who never wanted to fit in anywhere, always wanted to destroy anything that wasn't of their own cult.
 
Last edited:
You should be putting "Israel" in quotation marks, and Palestine without.

Palestine has been a placename since the 5th century B.C. It was used with regularity all throughout history

On the other hand, the Kingdom of Israel ended 3,000 years ago, and except for a brief time according to the Bible
where the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea were united, the Israelites were distinct from the Judeans (Jews). They warred against one another.
By the time the Romans got to the scene, the split had already been centuries old. Judea from which we get the term Jews was ruled by Edomites, also called Idumeans, and the Romans allowed that group to have some local control, but they ruined it, as you should be aware.
They were heavily influenced by the Babylonians after they were removed from Jerusalem also, and this Babylonian influence stuck with them.

The term Israel was for a man, Jacob, and the Bible says his descendants would form many nations, certainly not just the Judeans.
The Israelites spread all over the known world, into Asia and Europe and Africa. This is why they were called the Lost 10 Tribes.
Virtually all of them were pagans, then Christians, and some Muslims, not "Jews" by religion. Jacob/Israel had 13 children, with 4 different wives. The promises of God were not only to the descendants of Judah, who was only 1 of his children. Judah married a Caananite (Gen 28:2).which further makes that contention of modern Zionism ludicrous.

History is interesting but it needs to be provided by real sources, not politically-motivated spinners. Anyway, you may call them what you wish, but in fact, there are many Europeans which have ancient Israelite blood in them, perhaps even you. So, it's not right to call them all "garbage", but rather, we should seek not to be swain by falsehoods, like the pretensions of the modern Zionist ideology. When "Israel" was granted its place, it was hoped that the so-called Jews would live better with their neighbors, but it didn't happen. The Palestine that peacefully existed for centuries was destroyed by them. Every f'n day...because it was inhabited by Christians and Muslims

Palestine is a place but it's never been a people. It's changed hands far too many times for any kind of identity to form.

It's most recent identity is Syrian. The sole purpose of the "Palestinian" label is to gather sympathy.

Say what you want about Israel, but you cannot deny they have an identity that is distinct from others in the region.

And yes they are both garbage people in the aggregate. Are there good Syrians? Probably. Are there good Israelis? Doubtful but possible sure.

Mostly just garbage people though on both sides.

, and the Zionist Jews are an incestual group of supremacist megalomaniacs who never wanted to fit in anywhere, always wanted to destroy anything that wasn't of their own cult.

Probably can remove the Zionist qualifier and this would still be accurate.
 
Last edited:
Oh no not Palestine the random territory invented by the British whatever will we do without Palestine it has such a rich cultural history omg

Good riddance I say bye!
One could say the same thing about Israel.

Jews and Muslims have been fighting over this patch of dirt for thousands of years and likely will continue to. My concern is that the Israeli response to the terror attack is so far out of proportion that it amounts to genocide.
 
One could say the same thing about Israel.

Jews and Muslims have been fighting over this patch of dirt for thousands of years and likely will continue to. My concern is that the Israeli response to the terror attack is so far out of proportion that it amounts to genocide.

Its not a genocide it's a duel between people. One in which a ceasefire will not occur. When diplomacy is not a real alternative war is righteous by definition. You either fight on your feet or you die like a dog.

Israel is doing a fine job of it to. They are outnumbered by Hamas and their allies more than 10 to 1. They are only winning by fighting smarter.

This is what has been well understood since Sun Tzu wrote the art of war thousands of years ago.

Israel therefore has the natural right to defend themselves and their futures by any means necessary.
 
Last edited:
One could say the same thing about Israel.

Yea I wouldn't really care if the situation was reversed and the Syrians were winning.

Jews and Muslims have been fighting over this patch of dirt for thousands of years and likely will continue to. My concern is that the Israeli response to the terror attack is so far out of proportion that it amounts to genocide.

They're both wanting to genocide each other. I say let them do it, shrug.
 
One could say the same thing about Israel.

Jews and Muslims have been fighting over this patch of dirt for thousands of years and likely will continue to. My concern is that the Israeli response to the terror attack is so far out of proportion that it amounts to genocide.

What you're saying isn't even true. Jews, Muslims and Christians lived peaceably in the Holy Land since the times of the Crusades ended.
The biggest problem was probably the Damascus Affair in the mid-1800's, where Christians and Muslims together were convinced the Jews were carrying out blood libel against them.
And the October 7th "terror" attack was preknown by Israel, they had all the warnings, and it was really called Operation Al-Aqsa Flood,
and Israel killed more of their own than Hamas did on that day, and Israel has been in a state of permanent terror against Palestinians, and others,
including the British early on, since it began.
I do agree with your final sentence, though. The blinders are OFF for a lot of people, finally.
 
Last edited:
Israel has nukes, Airforce with F35's, Ballistic missiles, tanks, etc etc

Palestine has none of that.

It's a genocide.
 
Israel has nukes, Airforce with F35's, Ballistic missiles, tanks, etc etc

Palestine has none of that.

It's a genocide.
Just having military superiority doesn't make it a genocide.

They could have easily lost the war if they weren't smart at it.

They still could lose if Hamas gains a strategic victory from the war.

That would be like if they can win the hearts the minds of the world and make people think they are the victims even though they fucking caused the ceasefire to end and the war to continue to its logical conclusion.
 
Israel obviously has lost the hearts & mind argument.
Well hearts and minds aren't priceless. Some things are priceless and that is the state of Israel and the lives of their people.

Angered man may again be happy, and a resentful man again
be pleased, a state that has perished cannot be restored, nor
can the dead be brought back to life.
 
I think it's reasonable to deduce that the ancestors of the Palestinians were dwelling in the land even before Abraham arrived with his tribe.

The two verses below from Genesis are when Abram is first approaching the land of the Canaanites from his homeland (present-day Iraq).

The Deuteronomy verse is Yahweh's instructions to the Israelites as they make their way to the Promised Land from the desert.

Genesis 12:16
And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Sichem, unto the plain of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land.

Genesis 13:7
And there was a strife between the herdmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdmen of Lot’s cattle: and the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelled then in the land.

Deuteronomy 7:1-2
When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou. And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them.

commands013.png
 
Last edited:
  • Abraham begat Ishmael and Isaac. It was the custom of the day for the blessing and the birthright of the covenant to pass to the firstborn, Ishmael.
  • Isaac begat Jacob and Esau. They were twins, but Esau was firstborn, so the birthright as well as the blessing of the firstborn rightfully belong to him.
  • Jacob, with his brother Esau, made what some might consider "a contract entered under duress" whereby Jacob acquired the birthright. Then, at his mother's insistence and with his mother's assistance Jacob lied to his Father's face to get the blessing of the firstborn (the largest chunk of the inheritance).
  • When he learned of the deception, Esau was HOT HOT HOT and swore a blood-oath to kill his brother.
  • Jacob did something all night long that resembled wrestling with what was probably an angel of Yahweh, a brutal war god. In the morning as they were smoking a cigarette Jacob playfully asked for something to remember him by, and the angel gave Jacob a new name, Israel, which in Hebrew means something along the lines of "He who was busy all night with a messenger of a god doing something that is kind of like wrestling."
  • Jacob was noticeably limping after this encounter lol
  • Israel (the scammer formally known as Jacob) begat 12 sons which are the 12 tribes of Israel.
According to the Old Testament, Abram asked God "Hey, what about Ishmael?" and God replied "Don't worry about Ishmael. He too, will begat nations."

Muhammad is a descendant of Ishmael.

So technically, all ethnic Jews are descendants of Jacob, and all non-Jewish Semitic peeps are descendants of Ishmael and Esau.

Thus, as Billy Graham said..... "To understand the Middle East conflict one must first understand that it is a blood-feud between two brothers that goes back 5000 years."

commands013.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top