Majority of Americans now believe Obama is "dishonest and untrustworthy"

That sounds right, unlikely that SWC and by extensions Dems standing with him will be able to rebound from this stunning loss of trust in foreseeable future.

Rather ironic, don'tcha think?

If O's popularity in the press keeps sinking, it's because he won't go to war. Then the Republic-cons will try to elect a warmonger to put us in WWIII.

If O does go to war, all will be well.
 
Last edited:
Just in time to punt the ball to team red. Ugh! Wash, rinse, repeat...

Thread winner!

"The definition of insanity is repeating the same mistakes over and over again and expecting different results."
 
If O's popularity in the press keeps sinking, it's because he won't go to war. Then the Republic-cons will try to elect a warmonger to put us in WWIII.

Which is why it is extremely important for liberty activists to run for and win seats in their local GOP committee. The direction the party takes in 2016, is heavily influenced by those holding committee positions.
 
Rather ironic, don'tcha think?

If O's popularity in the press keeps sinking, it's because he won't go to war. Then the Republic-cons will try to elect a warmonger to put us in WWIII.

If O does go to war, all will be well.

There is certainly irony there,like much of 2-party drama. But there is difference between GOP and Dems when it comes to Iran war drama. GOP is Iraq-war burnt party and Bush after realizing his blunder not only rejected calls of neocons/Israel lobby agents in US to attack Iran but actually started prosecuting top Israel lobby executives for Espionage after they tried to acquire/pass US intel on Iran to Isreal.

Democratic Party is known as Party of Israel, neocons/wall streeters carefully cultivated a political orphan nPlant who quietly dropped AIPAC Espionage prosecution after getting in White House and became their helpless puppet. He has been timidly trying to walk a fine line between AIPAC/lobby's demands/threats/money baggers masters pressures and do gooders in his party by covertly sponsoring civil wars in mideast/destabilization of Israel's adversaries to distract attention from Israel's expansion of Palestinian occupation. Bush in contrast had forced jewish settlers out of Gaza, his pressure was such that their PM Sharon went in coma soon afterwards and remains there today.

FBI steps up AIPAC espionage probe
Dec 16, 2004 - The FBI raided AIPAC's offices in early December. ... investigations began when the FBI discovered “new, 'massive' Israeli spying operations in ... affair” revealed the “escalating fight over Iran policy” in the Bush administration.

AIPAC/Likudnik Larry Franklin Arrested for Espionage on Behalf of ...
Nor does it explain the FBI raids on AIPAC's Capitol Hill headquarters, from which ... If President Bush really wants to resolve the Arab-Israeli problem, he cannot ...

Hurricane Katrina as divine retribution
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Katrina_as_divine_retribution‎
Failure to support Israel - Ovadia Yosef, a prominent ultra-Orthodox Israeli rabbi, declared that Hurricane Katrina to be "God's punishment for President Bush's support of ... 2005 withdrawal of Jewish settlers from the Gaza strip".
 
Blame it all on Obama, while Congress has seen as low as 4% approval ratings in some non scientific polls.
 
Blame it all on Obama, while Congress has seen as low as 4% approval ratings in some non scientific polls.

So far, Obama has been the Teflon Don when it has come to scandals. Being that the Obamacare website glitch is the only one that has truly stuck, you can't blame the GOP for being gleeful. As long as no one signs up for Obamacare, the Dems are going to continue to take a beating. However, Romneycare also experienced low numbers when it was first released, then when the deadline approached, the masses signed up quickly. Assuming they fix the website and the masses sign up, I doubt this will hurt Obama much in the long run, other than probably being a permanent footnote in his presidential bio. I guess it beats Dubya Bush's "Great Recession" footnote.
 
THIS is the reason the MSM is smacking Obama:

As Iran and the six world powers resume the next round of nuclear talks in Geneva on Wednesday, US President Barack Obama pleads with American senators to ignore the aggressive lobbying campaign by Israel and hold off on new sanctions against Tehran.


During a two-hour White House meeting on Tuesday, Obama called on senators to give more time for diplomacy with the Islamic Republic, The Hill reports.

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee told reporters after the meeting that the Obama administration believes a preliminary deal with Iran may be at hand.

“They are very explicit about what they think they may be able to achieve,” Corker said.

Members of Congress in both parties have been somewhat skeptical toward the nuclear talks.

On Tuesday, lawmakers in both the House and Senate sent the administration bipartisan letters urging President Obama to adopt a tougher stance with Iran when negotiators meet again on Wednesday.

“We feel strongly that any easing of sanctions along the lines that [the international community] is reportedly considering should require Iran to roll back its nuclear program more significantly than now envisioned,” six senators wrote in a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry.

The letter, signed by Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), John McCain (R-Ariz.), Bob Casey (D-Penn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), urges US negotiators to demand that Iran suspend all uranium enrichment and reprocessing activities.

White House press secretary Jay Carney acknowledged Tuesday that there was “obvious diversity of opinion in the room” about the necessity of holding off on new sanctions.

Obama assured the senators that “the relief that we are considering as part of a first rep is limited, temporary, and reversible,” Carney said.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been struggling in recent weeks to persuade US senators to buck Obama and consider new sanctions against Iran at a time when negotiators from both sides are saying a deal is “quite possible” over Tehran’s nuclear energy program.

“I think you should not only keep up the pressure; I think you should increase the pressure,” Netanyahu said in an interview with CNN on Sunday.

Netanyahu’s economy and trade minister, Naftali Bennett, visited Washington last week, actively lobbying US lawmakers to act against Tehran. Israeli ambassador to the US Ron Dermer will also meet with congressional Republicans and Democrats this week over Iran.

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed an anti-Iran sanctions bill in July by a 400-20 vote seeking to cut Iran’s oil exports by one million barrels a day for the next year. The Senate Banking Committee is currently looking at a similar version of the bill.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/11/19/335562/obama-asks-senators-to-ignore-israel/
 


It is getting bit out of hand as suspected drone king is being depicted as a political thug:


  1. Marc Thiessen: Obama's dishonest presidency - The Washington Post
    www.washingtonpost.com/...obamas-dishonest.../841947c6-4561-11e3-b6f...
    Nov 4, 2013 - The Wall Street Journal broke the news this weekend that, even as President Obama was telling the American people they could keep their ...
  2. Romney says Obama was 'dishonest' in his healthcare promises ...
    nypost.com/.../romney-says-obama-was-dishonest-in-his-healthcare-pro...‎
    4 days ago - Former presidential nominee Mitt Romney says President Obama was knowingly “dishonest” when he repeatedly promised Americans could ...
  3. Is Barack Obama America's Most Dishonest Politician? | Power Line
    A lot of politicians are dishonest, but Barack Obama may be in a league by himself. He appeared on the David Letterman show last night, and ...
  4. Is Obama The Most Dishonest President In History?
 
Last edited:
44% still seem him as honest and trustworthy?

If even 1% remains, we still have work to do. And even then, someone will try to take his place.

Obama is not trustworthy because the Puppetters that pull his strings are not trustworthy. Changing the Puppet changes nothing.
 
Majority of Americans now believe Obama is "dishonest and untrustworthy"

... and that's precisely the reason they elected him in the first place.

Then, four years later, like Moostraks said,

...punt the ball to team red. Ugh! Wash, rinse, repeat...

Oh wait, the blue team still has the ball...
 
Looking at some apologotic views here and online, if drone king is really being pressured/harrased/threatened or abused by his puppet masters into doing what he has been doing and his policies are not his true self, why doesn't he take US public & Congress into confidence if he is really being abused (not physically) behind the scenes by his pupms?

In the meantime, people are 100% right to judge Goldman Sachs plant based on his policies.

Pew: Obama less 'honest,' more 'incompetent' than Bush ...

Jul 1, 2013 - The word incompetent is a popular word for both, though Obama just edged Bush in those references, 27-26. Another shared word is honest.
 
Assuming their accuracy, the only thing these polls illustrate is the nearly bottomless stoopidity of the meaner. What else can one take away from this once he realizes it took more than five years for a blindingly apparent truth to be seen by these willful idiots.

I would consider an otherwise organically intact man, lips to lips with a crocodile and refusing to recognize the creature as such, to be marginally less stoopid than the mean American voter.

The brand of willful idiocy demonstrated in this country tempts me to pray for a meteor strike.
 
Back
Top