MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT: Lawyers for Ron Paul Lawsuit NOTE: Having the lawsuit not up 4 debate

[rb3b3]

Guess We won't be seeing Steve around anymore! What's amazing to me is him trying to deny it lol, now I know what they mean by every inmate in jail are all innocent hahahahahaha.

 

[BSU kid]

The fact that steve was on here trying to derail us, only means that the establishment is scared of this legal action. I say Keep at it!

 

[SilenceDewgooder]

When Reagan was considering running for Prez in '76, his focus was on a delegate strategy.

 

[sailingaway]

When Reagan was considering running for Prez in '76, his focus was on a delegate strategy.

Yeah, and Ron Paul led the Texas delegation for Reagan in 1976. Mind you, the same people backing Romney now fought Reagan then, so they don't see it as a plus, in fact I'm sure that is why they never allowed another candidate's name in contention again after that.

Now, back to the lawsuit.

 

[TheKnowBuddies]

No offense, but it is the exact same name and this is from before you even joined RPFs. You could have at least picked a new name if you were going to try to infiltrate this discussion that SailingAway and others have been working very hard on now for weeks. It's pretty shameful, mate.

How about Steve Dickson ...and the case AGAINST L4RP http://www.dailypaul.com/243838/steps-you-can-takeand-the-case-against-l4rp ??

( I did not get into name calling, Notice S___ addressed very little toward me, He knows who I am from DP. )

 

[TheKnowBuddies]

So many thought that RG would NOT get this far. The JUDGE got the admission that they BREAK their own rules. No wonder detractors are working overtime.
RG is filing in the Federal Appellate Court early next week as a backup to expedite. Transcript is planned to be posted on Monday. Full Steam Ahead.

 

[rb3b3]

So many thought that RG would NOT get this far. The JUDGE got the admission that they BREAK their own rules. No wonder detractors are working overtime.
RG is filing in the Federal Appellate Court early next week as a backup to expedite. Transcript is planned to be posted on Monday. Full Steam Ahead.

What about the people in this thread who have been members of rpf since 2007 saying Gilbert is being incompetent on purpose?? Why are the saying that? I would think if u have been. Member here for that long you re a true supporter? Or am I wring about tht too??

 

[sailingaway]

What about the people in this thread who have been members of rpf since 2007 saying Gilbert is being incompetent on purpose?? Why are the saying that? I would think if u have been. Member here for that long you re a true supporter? Or am I wring about tht too??

Let's not derail the thread, you can start a different one about trolls if you like.

 

[robertwerden]

All I have to say is this: If you talk bad about the law suit in any way shape or form you go on my ignore list. Simple as that.

 

[TheKnowBuddies]

What about the people in this thread who have been members of rpf since 2007 saying Gilbert is being incompetent on purpose?? Why are the saying that? I would think if u have been. Member here for that long you re a true supporter? Or am I wring about tht too??

It's not about how long you've been in town, IMHO, It's about your choices of who and what to believe and trust. 1776 against all odds, Keep the Faith, make the best of what you can and stay focused on your goals. Changing the world is hard work.

 

[rb3b3]

Yeah I'm not interested in the trolls trying to derail us, just want to win this lawsuit and see Ron nominated from the floor and eventually win the GOP nomination and then beat Obama to become potus! BOOOOOOOOOO YA!!

 

[TheKnowBuddies]

Yeah I'm not interested in the trolls trying to derail us, just want to win this lawsuit and see Ron nominated from the floor and eventually win the GOP nomination and then beat Obama to become potus! BOOOOOOOOOO YA!!

I am working on establishing a respectful line of communication with Gilbert. He may know more about me than I am aware of. I made no excuses for any of human shortcomings, rather opposed undue personal attacks. He has very little respect for DP.
Source example from DP:
Submitted by Patriot Press_U... on Thu, 06/07/2012 - 10:12. Permalink

"No worries. I will not be posting any new articles on this site.
I was new here and I did not know this bumping Rule.
Now, I know the Rule serves the interests of those who seek to defame and curse. (not you)
I have learned enough about this site to know it is beneath my dignity to post articles here.
Thank you for your advice.
Can you assist me in getting the remainder of my articles deleted?
Richard"

If he comes around here, I hope we we show respect?
With the prospect to UNBIND ALL DELEGATES - ALL POLITICAL PARTIES, he is the only Quarterback that we have in the game.
Let us become constructive. Landmark HISTORICAL event -

 

[sailingaway]

How about Steve Dickson ...and the case AGAINST L4RP http://www.dailypaul.com/243838/steps-you-can-takeand-the-case-against-l4rp ??

( I did not get into name calling, Notice S___ addressed very little toward me, He knows who I am from DP. )

I just brought this up with the mods at daily paul and it does not seem to be the same Steve, so while the one in our thread seems to be from Mitt Romney Central, the one on that DP post seems to be different, at least from the information we have now. There could easily be more than one steve who don't like the suit.

 

[sailingaway]

I am working on establishing a respectful line of communication with Gilbert. He may know more about me than I am aware of. I made no excuses for any of human shortcomings, rather opposed undue personal attacks. He has very little respect for DP.
Source example from DP:
Submitted by Patriot Press_U... on Thu, 06/07/2012 - 10:12. Permalink

"No worries. I will not be posting any new articles on this site.
I was new here and I did not know this bumping Rule.
Now, I know the Rule serves the interests of those who seek to defame and curse. (not you)
I have learned enough about this site to know it is beneath my dignity to post articles here.
Thank you for your advice.
Can you assist me in getting the remainder of my articles deleted?
Richard"

If he comes around here, I hope we we show respect?
With the prospect to UNBIND ALL DELEGATES - ALL POLITICAL PARTIES, he is the only Quarterback that we have in the game.
Let us become constructive. Landmark HISTORICAL event -

Once we get something to give him that might be a good idea but right now, I'm concerned that someone here who doesn't like the suit would get him mad and close the door more firmly between us. If we do end up wanting to give him any sort of statement of facts or mock up complaint, I don't want someone here attacking him to make that connection impossible.

 

[TheKnowBuddies]

Once we get something to give him that might be a good idea but right now, I'm concerned that someone here who doesn't like the suit would get him mad and close the door more firmly between us. If we do end up wanting to give him any sort of statement of facts or mock up complaint, I don't want someone here attacking him to make that connection impossible.

Well, remember, there is that tag team connection, if you read the threads on DP.
None the less, No One knows more about the 9th circuit action than RG and the Judge. We may gain a lot more confidence once we get the transcript. RG says that the Judge is watching the evidence/DVD's. Although not used at this time, they paint a clear picture. We should not assume that Judge does not have the BIG picture.
In the next oral arguments, the Judge may again get more admissions out of the Defense. This is not a usual case, this is a landmark case, historical case, and so far RG has men on base and likely scoring position. I fully support RG not only here but on twitter.
Examples:
Paul Napolitano ‏@TheKnowBuddies
@USA_Free_Press Thanks for answering my questions on @RonPaulGirl radio. Looking forward to transcript.
Retweeted by USA_Patriot_Press

Paul Napolitano ‏@TheKnowBuddies
@USA_Free_Press Cheers 2 RG! - The fight is on - All they can do now is to detract & attempt to delay - The Judge has the big picture
Retweeted by USA_Patriot_Press

Paul Napolitano ‏@TheKnowBuddies
Catch the Replay @RonPaulGirl Interviews Richard Gilbert Lawsuit Lead Attorney http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ronpaulgirl/2012/08/10/live-interview-with-attorney-richard-gilbert … @USA_Free_Press
Retweeted by USA_Patriot_Press

 

[sailingaway]

Well, remember, there is that tag team connection, if you read the threads on DP.
None the less, No One knows more about the 9th circuit action than RG and the Judge. We may gain a lot more confidence once we get the transcript. RG says that the Judge is watching the evidence/DVD's. Although not used at this time, they paint a clear picture. We should not assume that Judge does not have the BIG picture.
In the next oral arguments, the Judge may again get more admissions out of the Defense. This is not a usual case, this is a landmark case, historical case, and so far RG has men on base and likely scoring position. I fully support RG not only here but on twitter.
Examples:
Paul Napolitano ‏@TheKnowBuddies
@USA_Free_Press Thanks for answering my questions on @RonPaulGirl radio. Looking forward to transcript.
Retweeted by USA_Patriot_Press

Paul Napolitano ‏@TheKnowBuddies
@USA_Free_Press Cheers 2 RG! - The fight is on - All they can do now is to detract & attempt to delay - The Judge has the big picture
Retweeted by USA_Patriot_Press

Paul Napolitano ‏@TheKnowBuddies
Catch the Replay @RonPaulGirl Interviews Richard Gilbert Lawsuit Lead Attorney http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ronpaulgirl/2012/08/10/live-interview-with-attorney-richard-gilbert … @USA_Free_Press
Retweeted by USA_Patriot_Press

I don't honestly know the history at DP but it is clearly a sensitive subject. I got dumped on the second I asked about this and I'm not really interested in getting into it more on the web page, even in the mod comment forum. If the mods want to email me, they have my email address.

 

[Barrex]

LOL....I had so many things to say but I will restrain my self and just say: Lol.

Going forward:
-Unless something extraordinary happens our effort to collect information will not be used before Tampa. We simply are not that organized and fast to make it in such a short time.
-"Public Information Act"(or is it called "Freedom of Inforamtion Act??? sorry translating stuff is not my forte) includes access to reported crimes.(go there and file a simple request) Find out how many people reported crimes at conventions and elections.Get all informations available. This is already codified information that we can use!
-Contacting http://www.toolsforjustice.com wouldnt be bad idea because they are already collecting same information.-If we are taking this project seriously people will have to contact other people via e-mails, phones etc. Contact delegates, voters, convention goers etc. Taking videos and pictures from internet will not get us far.
-This project needs to be separated from LFRP, Richard Gilbert and lawsuit because it creates bad feeling with some people. Collected information can be used later in lawsuit or some other action.
- If someone (look sailingaway) writes article about "Collecting information about illegal activities during this elections" (or something like that) I am willing to spread it on all other Ron Paul friendly websites. I contacted them all and got accounts on all of them. (I would just add that moderator on RPF would be handling all personal info /emails, etc./)
-SMART plan
Specific= What are we going for here?
Measurable/Manageable= How many...
Attainable=?
Realistic=?
Timely=? This is not going to happen before Tampa.

I was ranting about this for a long time in most of the threads (ok rants) that I started and I pissed some people off but without PLAN and ORGANIZATION sucess chances sink faster than SteveT1736 credibility.

-I am willing to send that guy with nickname " NoFreeBeer" free beer if he changes his nickname.....it really is depressing and bugging the hell out of me (or is it in me...).

 

[sailingaway]

LOL....I had so many things to say but I will restrain my self and just say: Lol.

Going forward:
-Unless something extraordinary happens our effort to collect information will not be used before Tampa. We simply are not that organized and fast to make it in such a short time.
-"Public Information Act"(or is it called "Freedom of Inforamtion Act??? sorry translating stuff is not my forte) includes access to reported crimes.(go there and file a simple request) Find out how many people reported crimes at conventions and elections.Get all informations available. This is already codified information that we can use!
-Contacting http://www.toolsforjustice.com wouldnt be bad idea because they are already collecting same information.-If we are taking this project seriously people will have to contact other people via e-mails, phones etc. Contact delegates, voters, convention goers etc. Taking videos and pictures from internet will not get us far.
-This project needs to be separated from LFRP, Richard Gilbert and lawsuit because it creates bad feeling with some people. Collected information can be used later in lawsuit or some other action.
- If someone (look sailingaway) writes article about "Collecting information about illegal activities during this elections" (or something like that) I am willing to spread it on all other Ron Paul friendly websites. I contacted them all and got accounts on all of them. (I would just add that moderator on RPF would be handling all personal info /emails, etc./)
-SMART plan
Specific= What are we going for here?
Measurable/Manageable= How many...
Attainable=?
Realistic=?
Timely=? This is not going to happen before Tampa.

I was ranting about this for a long time in most of the threads (ok rants) that I started and I pissed some people off but without PLAN and ORGANIZATION sucess chances sink faster than SteveT1736 credibility.

-I am willing to send that guy with nickname " NoFreeBeer" free beer if he changes his nickname.....it really is depressing and bugging the hell out of me (or is it in me...).

foia usually takes 30 days, some states less (CA is 10) but the fastest would be for Brent Stafford to just get us a certified copy of his judgment by walking in and picking it up.

as for your timely stuff it remains to be seen how many jump on this. when we get going we can be mighty

But if only a couple of us are digging it all up it will be harder. Why don't you write the article though, because I'm right now more focused on a shorter window if there is an opportunity to use this before Tampa (there are delegate credentials battles right now for one thing). If we aren't going to make that window I'd be happy to write something up later.

 

[Barrex]

foia usually takes 30 days, some states less (CA is 10) but the fastest would be for Brent Stafford to just get us a certified copy of his judgment by walking in and picking it up.

as for your timely stuff it remains to be seen how many jump on this. when we get going we can be mighty

But if only a couple of us are digging it all up it will be harder. Why don't you write the article though, because I'm right now more focused on a shorter window if there is an opportunity to use this before Tampa (there are delegate credentials battles right now for one thing). If we aren't going to make that window I'd be happy to write something up later.

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best. We can try to collect and use data before Tampa but be prepared for possibility of not making it by that date.

My english is not perfect and (grammar nazis are after me) I dont want people reject this project because article is written poorly. Whenever you write it I will spread the word.

30 days is acceptable since this will be long endeavor. Like I said: "Unless something extraordinary happens our effort to collect information will not be used before Tampa". This should be prepared for things to come after Tampa, after LFRP lawsuit and injunctive relief. Attainable, realistic.

 

[sailingaway]

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best. We can try to collect and use data before Tampa but be prepared for possibility of not making it by that date.

My english is not perfect and (grammar nazis are after me) I dont want people reject this project because article is written poorly. Whenever you write it I will spread the word.

30 days is acceptable since this will be long endeavor. Like I said: "Unless something extraordinary happens our effort to collect information will not be used before Tampa". This should be prepared for things to come after Tampa, after LFRP lawsuit and injunctive relief. Attainable, realistic.

but the litigation schedule is what it is, and if we don't do something about that that is one thing, but I don't want the reason to be because we weren't prepared, So I'd rather scramble now but in not too long the window will be over one way or another and I don't have a problem writing something up for that. People get away with this crap BECAUSE everyone drops it when the election is over.