Mace & Bright are very similar. Cash, as I see it, is more of a "Club for Growth" type fiscal conservative, with a mix of socialcon and a Jacksonian FP. To compare them to current and past SC Senators, Mace & Bright would be more DeMint-like and Cash would be more like Scott. Any of them are an improvement. Personally, I am supporting Mace, but would have no problem giving my time and money to Bright.
I really like both Mace and Bright but atm it seems that Mace needs some touch-up work on her interview skillz. She definitely seems green but very genuine. Not a big fan of Bright's southern drawl but I can handle it I guess.
I'm sure they are but I'm one of those righteous northerners and it's not something that I'm use to to put it nicely.Southern drawls are popular in South Carolina. I like it personally, makes him seem more authentic.
Cash is criminally underrated, for some reason people dismiss him which I don't understand. Best way to describe him is as an old right paleo-con. On the issues, any of the three of them will be an all star in the Senate.
Do you mean most of the SC GOP? Because Mace and Bright have attacked Graham right out of the gate. I think Bright said Lindsey is acting as a "community organizer for the Muslim Brotherhood."It seems that SC politics are such that all of the politicians fear attacking Lindsey.
I read Mace's website when she decided to run...to much of a neo con on military for me.
"I believe in the Constitution and that only Congress has the ability to declare war. I also believe before making such a declaration, we ensure we have looked at all possible options. Radical Islam continues to be a threat. I do not support continuing to send US aid and weapons to countries that burn our flag, train terrorists or that threaten American interests at home or abroad." - from Mace's website.
An almost identical position to Rand's. Do you even know what a neo-con is?
This race is unique in that Bright is both more mainstream/electable and more libertarian than Mace.