Sigh...here we go again. I must again object to my fellow liberty fighter's support for taking Connie Mack's name off for a number of reasons. I will list a few below:
1) He has been endorsed by Senator Rand Paul (if you're a perfectionist or purist...you don't like him. if you're a reasonable person who is willing to accept that a liberty fighter isn't going to agree with you 100%, then Rand Paul is a great senator):
http://atr.rollcall.com/florida-connie-mack-gets-rand-paul-endorsement/
2) He voted against final passage of the Patriot Act's reauthorization:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll066.xml
3) Connie Mack voted against final passage of CISPA:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll192.xml
4) Connie Mack has led the fight for fiscal responsibility:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...more-momentum-in-the-us-senate-126027713.html or
http://mack.house.gov/index.cfm?p=penny-plan
5) He voted to end foreign aid for Pakistan:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll263.xml
6) He has a 98% from the Club for Growth during the 112th Congress 1st Session and a 90% lifetime rating (one of the best in congress).
There are several more reasons to continue to keep Rep. Mack on the list. If you are a purist or perfectionist, you don't like Rep. Mack because he isn't perfect. But if you want to improve, Rep. Mack is the guy to support. He has shown through his support for cutting spending, voting to end foreign aid, and his vote against CISPA, that he should be elected over Senator Bill Nelson (a liberal Democrat). I urge support for keeping Connie Mack on the list. He isn't perfect, but he is one of the good guys in congress! Thank you.