Inkblots
Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2010
- Messages
- 2,229
KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN! >(
I literally haven't been rickrolled in years. Sigh.
Last edited:
How? Wasn't it 25 at-large at stake here ?
Look folks, let's make one thing clear.
It only requires a majority to adjourn. (unless there is some rule in the OK State GOP rules book---which I highly doubt).
Anyone who claims it requires 2/3rds really undermines their credibility.
That said, I still think they improperly adjourned b/c the vote was close and it was not counted, so it is really debatable as to whether the majority actually voted to adjourn.
1.Home
2. They are not since you can not change locations without a certain amount of days leway to inform people of the location
3. Everyting from full video recording to TV crews being there reporting. If they still try ot invalidate they will have to breakk all THERE rules which would invalidate the entire state at the RNC........In Short: they won't
1) Most of them left after they unsuccessfully attempted to adjourn the convention. They failed to achieve the 2/3 supermajority necessary for adjournment, so the convention was able to continue as a quorum of delegates stayed behind.
2) There is no other convention. The so-called "rump" convention is the valid convention, conducted under the rules of the Call to Convention and with a valid quorum.
3) All this was taped, so there is indisputable evidence on this point. RNC won't be able to invalidate it.
This is the key point. An alternate convention CANNOT be held anywhere else. The convention we are watching is the one and only valid convention.
These people know what they are doing. Everything is proceeding in an orderly manner. They have a parliamentarian and they are consulting him.
About the location, you guys say that the convention cannot be held in an alternate location without prior notice to the delegates. Isn't the parking lot an alternate location? How is it not? Couldn't RNC claim that this was an "alternate location"?
Is "rump" convention a legit term?
I am playing the Devil's Advocate here, because I want our case to be solid in this, seeing as how fubar this whole thing got. I expect this to be hotly contested by the Romney camp, RNC and OK GOP.
KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNN! >(
I literally haven't been rickrolled in years. Sigh.
1) Most of them left after they unsuccessfully attempted to adjourn the convention. They failed to demonstrate the [EDIT: majority] necessary for adjournment, so the convention was able to continue as a quorum of delegates stayed behind.
2) There is no other convention. The so-called "rump" convention is the valid convention, conducted under the rules of the Call to Convention and with a valid quorum.
3) All this was taped, so there is indisputable evidence on this point. RNC won't be able to invalidate it.
About the location, you guys say that the convention cannot be held in an alternate location without prior notice to the delegates. Isn't the parking lot an alternate location? How is it not? Couldn't RNC claim that this was an "alternate location"?
Is "rump" convention a legit term?
I am playing the Devil's Advocate here, because I want our case to be solid in this, seeing as how fubar this whole thing got. I expect this to be hotly contested by the Romney camp, RNC and OK GOP.
Point of information: Do page refreshes count as a new views?we have jumped to 22K from 17.7K in past 30 minutes or so. I've never seen a thread with so many views in one day. I think we are being CISPA'ed and NSA'ed HARD!!!!
Point of information: Do page refreshes count as a new views?
Point of information: Do page refreshes count as a new views?