Limbaugh transcript

Perception is in the eye of the beholder

I think a lot of what Rush says here is really true, and shows us what we need to keep working on. He's right. It doesn't matter that Ron Paul was right. Perception is everything.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/dai...110.guest.html


I don't want to disagree that we need to keep working but please also understand that all of America isn't as easily fooled as most pundits, advertisers, and others might think. I didn't even see the debates when they aired, I saw a clip of them when I was bored and looking at a top twenty list of various viral video's. As someone who had become depressed about our countries political system due to a lack of politicians with principles I haven't paid attention to elections other than when they provided interesting sound bites.

As I watched the clip of some guy I had never heard of (Ron Paul) make a reasonable statement and then the attack from Giuliani and then the din as every other candidate also tried to jump on this guy I was flabbergasted. For the first time I had to ask myself are our politicians really this clueless. I mean I had become disenchanted with our government due to what I perceive to be a pandering to special interests and a lack of genuine care about the people of America but I didn't think that they were stupid. To be honest I don't think they are stupid which in my mind made this even worse because they found themselves in an indefensible position and instead of just saying "Oh, I misunderstood" they actually stuck to their incorrect argument.

This was so amazing to me and the fact that Ron Paul actually stood up for his position once attacked only impressed me more (I mean how many people in front of a National audience being attacked by virtually everyone on stage would have caved). I immediately became a Ron Paul supporter even without knowing all of his views because I saw something I haven't seen before, a politician that comes across as intelligent, sincere, and has a backbone. Those facts alone make up for any difference I have with his views.

So while perception may be everything, not everyone perceives things the same way. That is also why when I tell my friends and family about Ron Paul I do so very simply He's a Republican who has stuck with his views for 30 years, is intelligent, has integrity, is for an end to war, and for smaller government.

You may have noticed I left out any mention of libertarianism and various other key words often used with Ron Paul because a lot of those key words have been implanted with one very negative connotation which is a waste of a vote. Society, right or wrong, have been conditioned to the idea that you must be a Democrat or Republican to be worth voting for.

So for the first time I have done things I have never done before. I signed up on a campaign website, I have and am actively telling people I know to check out Ron Paul, I have donated to a political campaign, posting on a political forum, and come primary time it will be the first time I vote in a primary election and it only took 13 years of being eligible to vote to find a candidate worth doing these things for.

I apologize for the long post but sometimes you just can't stop writing when your excited about something and I wanted to get my point across that while Dr. Paul's statement might have been perceived one way by some, to others of us it was perceived much differently and is the reason we are here.

Thank you,
Brent

P.S. I was actually surprised by Rush's comments. He didn't seem to be against Dr. Paul other than for his name awareness.
 

Attachments

  • Chinese gold reserves July 2015.jpg
    Chinese gold reserves July 2015.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 0
Welcome abaord Brent!

I can't listen to Rush, because I think he's an ass. LIke you, I was just happy to see that he's not entirely gainst Paul from the get go.

I'm like you in the respect that I've never bothered to vote in a primary before, but I've been eligible for 25 years.

I've been a fan of Ron Paul for quite a few years, and I'm just estatic that he's running. I wish F-red T hompson wasn't going to jump in. He's going to be the spoiler, I'm afraid.
 
Sounds like someone can't resist dipping their toes into the pond of Ron Paul. I'll take his comments as an endorsement.

I don't get the whole "spamming polls" comment. In almost every poll out there you can only vote once. I think neocons are confusing spam with getting their ass handed to them on a plate. A big plate.
 
Sounds like someone can't resist dipping their toes into the pond of Ron Paul. I'll take his comments as an endorsement.

I don't get the whole "spamming polls" comment. In almost every poll out there you can only vote once. I think neocons are confusing spam with getting their ass handed to them on a plate. A big plate.

I think what they mean is that its not an accurate cross-section. This isn't a site we individually happen across. Its not an accurate representation of the normal visitors of Little Green Footballs.
 
But why aren't the other candidates also doing it? And if the LGF crowd only wanted to know what their visitors thought, then why not email them or something less public?
 
I think Fred can be defeated. He'll still be like Bush, i bet. My gut tells me he's a hold your nose and vote for him kinda guy. I don't trust him. If he's so great, how come I've never heard of him before now. I have followed politicians quite a bit and this guy I don't remember making much conservative noise.
 
HIs resume is pretty impressive. He's got enough experience to make him viable, but not so much that he comes across as a career politician. I think he's a pro-war kind of guy.

He lost me with the Cuban cigars. We already have enough legislators who don't have any respect for the laws. I'm not voting for another one.
 
HIs resume is pretty impressive. He's got enough experience to make him viable, but not so much that he comes across as a career politician. I think he's a pro-war kind of guy.

He lost me with the Cuban cigars. We already have enough legislators who don't have any respect for the laws. I'm not voting for another one.
 
I think Fred can be defeated. He'll still be like Bush, i bet. My gut tells me he's a hold your nose and vote for him kinda guy. I don't trust him. If he's so great, how come I've never heard of him before now. I have followed politicians quite a bit and this guy I don't remember making much conservative noise.

He's well-known.
 
Perception is the immediate reaction to information. If it's manipulative, some fall for it and talk about them to everyone, others get annoyed that they aren't being dealt with honestly, and turn off to them. If one from the first group tries talking to them not much will happen.

On the other hand, if the information is factual and leads to reasonable positions, some people who have already been manipulated into a neo-con perspective will completely disagree and reject them, but fall for others like Giuliani. Others, though, consider the information and see that the position is reasonable and when the likes of a Giuliani supporter tries promoting their candidate, the more rational one will have a solid response and can engage in a real discussion about the realities of what's happening in this country.
 
If F. Thompson enters the race it will hurt Rudy McRomney much more than Dr. Paul.
He will siphon of votes for the "top tier" whose supporters aren't dedicated to their candidate like Dr. Paul's.
 
If F. Thompson enters the race it will hurt Rudy McRomney much more than Dr. Paul.
He will siphon of votes for the "top tier" whose supporters aren't dedicated to their candidate like Dr. Paul's.
I think your right. Most people who are anxiously awaiting Thompson to throw his hat in the ring don`t like RP. They want a pro war candidate, but the "top three" although war mongers are not conservative enough. When Thompson announces they will blindly follow him over the abyss.
 
I know that he's well known. I just don't remember his name being among the great conservatives that I knew of.
 
Fred Thompson simply has star power, and that's the thing that the pro-war people are imagining will save them. Notice all the allusions to Reagan. What they think is needed is someone who can articulate their message, a "great communicator" if you will, and Mr. Thompson currently fits the bill.

Quite honestly he's got nothing in political reputation over a guy like Duncan Hunter, but he does have a profile on IMDb.
 
Back
Top