It is human nature to think. You can continue to think of people as being a group and I will see them as individuals. Groups do not think, people do. Peoples can agree and often do. That does not unite them.
Serving your government/society in ways other than military. ie peace corps or working in a free clinic, etc
So how are you going to get everyone to think the way you want them to? I just don't see everyone deciding that we are all individuals therefore a government is not necessary. I'd probably be okay with no government but I don't think most people would go for it. In fact many people would probably take advantage of it in a negative way. I'd like to know about a successful prosperous society that exists or existed in the past that did not have any sort of government. I've never heard of one so I have no example to look at to judge the feasibility of it.
This test is total bullshit. It is an anarchist purity test. Anarchism is not the same thing as libertarianism,
It depends on what kind of anarchism it is. Many socialists are anarchists (more specifically, anarcho-syndicalists), but libertarian anarchists like Murray Rothbard and David Friedman are anarcho-capitalists.Actually, anarchism is libertarianism taken to it's logical conclusion.